DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Investigation of Road Crossing Behaviour of Older Pedestrians at Unsignalized Crosswalk

무신호 단일로 횡단보도에서 고령 보행자의 횡단행태조사 및 분석

  • JANG, Jeong Ah (TOD based Sustainable City Transportation Research Center, Ajou University) ;
  • KIM, Junghwa (TOD based Sustainable City Transportation Research Center, Ajou University) ;
  • CHOI, Keechoo (Department of Transportation System Engineering, Ajou University)
  • 장정아 (아주대학교 TOD기반 지속가능 도시교통연구센터) ;
  • 김정화 (아주대학교 TOD기반 지속가능 도시교통연구센터) ;
  • 최기주 (아주대학교 교통시스템공학과)
  • Received : 2015.11.20
  • Accepted : 2016.03.10
  • Published : 2016.06.30

Abstract

In Korea, older pedestrian accounted for 57% of all pedestrian deaths although a ratio of older pedestrian accidents to total pedestrian accidents was only 25.9%. Though ageing population problem becomes more challenging for road safety, little is know about the behaviour of older pedestrian's behaviour. This study aimed to identify road crossing behaviour of older pedestrian at three-lane unsignalized crosswalks using video image analysis and to compare the behaviour of older pedestrian to younger one by indicators including approaching speed, the number of walking steps and other factors. The results showed that there was a difference of approaching time at kerb, waiting time at kerb, the number of glances at kerb, and the number of glances at crossing between two groups under the situation of car approaching to crosswalks. It also showed that older pedestrian usually spent 1.16 times more than younger pedestrian to walk across the crosswalk with only 84.4% of walking speed of younger pedestrian. The number of steps of older pedestrian for road crossing was 1.12 times higher with 90% shorter steps than younger pedestrian. It was concluded that older pedestrian usually decided to walk across in case of 1.67 times longer headway than younger pedestrian's decision. These results could be applied in road and facility design for better safety of older pedestrians.

현재 우리나라 고령자의 보행사고건수는 전체 보행자 사고건수의 25.9%를 차지하고 있고 이중 고령자 사망사고는 57%에 달한다. 향후 다가올 고령사회를 대비하여 이러한 고령자 사고를 줄이기 위한 다양한 노력이 필요하다. 본 연구는 3차로 무신호 일반로 구간내 횡단보도지역에서 고령자와 비고령자의 횡단단계에 대한 이동행태지표를 정의, 조사 및 분석한 연구이다. 유의성 분석 결과, 고령자와 비고령자의 이동 행태상 몇 가지의 결과를 얻을 수 있었다. 첫째, 접근차량의 존재유무에 따라 고령자와 비고령자 간에 횡단보도 접근시간, 횡단보도 대기시간, 횡단보도 연석에서의 시선수, 횡단하면서의 시선수애 대한 통계적 차이가 존재하였다. 둘째, 횡단 보도 횡단시간의 경우 고령자는 비고령자의 1.16배가 더 소요되고, 고령자의 보행속도는 비고령자의 84.4%의 수준이다. 셋째, 보행수는 고령자가 비고령자에 비하여 약 1.12배가 많았고, 보폭의 크기는 고령자가 비고령자에 비하여 90%의 수준을 갖는 것으로 확인되었다. 넷째, 고령자는 횡단을 위해 대기하는 동안 연속된 차량의 차두간격이 비고령자 대비 1.67배 이상 크게 요구하고 있었다. 이러한 주요 분석 결과는 고령자 횡단 시설 및 도로설계 등에 기초적인 자료로서 활용이 가능할 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Burg A. (1968), Vision Test Score and Driving Record: Additional Findings, Dep. of Eng., UCLA report., 18.
  2. Cho Y. H. (2014), A Case Study on the Traffic Safety Measures for the Elderly Walkers: the Case of Namgu, Gwangju Univ. Degree of Master.
  3. Choi S. T., Lee H. S., Choo S. H., Kim S. J. (2015), Development of Severity Model for Elderly Pedestrian Accidents Considering Urban Facility Factor, J. Korean Soc. Saf., 30(1), Korean Society of Safety, 94-103. https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2015.30.1.094
  4. Ding T., Wang S., Xi J., Zheng L., Wang Q. (2015), Psychology-Based Research on Unsafe Behavior by Pedestrians When Crossing the Street, Advances in Mechanical Engineering 7(1), 203867.
  5. Guangxin L., Keping L. (2009), Pedestrian's Psychology on Gap Selecting When Crossing Street, In International Conference on Transportation Engineering 2009, ASCE, 2138-2144.
  6. Jeong J. H., Seol J. H., Choi S. T., Rho J. H., Lee J. S. (2014), Severity Analysis for Vulnerable Pedestrian Accident Utilizing Vehicle Recorder Database of Taxi, J. Korean Soc. Saf., 29(3), Korean Society of Safety, 98-106. https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2014.29.3.098
  7. Jeong W. D. (2011), The Severity of Traffic Accidents Model's Comparative Analysis of Elderly and Non-Elderly, Ph.D Dissertation, Kyungil University., 30-33.
  8. Lim K. W., Jang T. Y., Jang H., Ji H. J. (2006), Developing the Predicting Model of Older Drivers' Accidents, The 53th Conference of KST, Korean Society of Transportation, 193-202.
  9. Oh J. S. (2015), Elderly Pedestrian Walking Behavior and Analysis, Conference of Society of Transportation.
  10. Oxley J. A., Charlton J., Flides B. (2006), The Effect of Cognitive Impairment on Older Pedestrian Behaviour and Crash Risk, Monash University Accident research centre., 50.
  11. Oxley J. A., Ihsen E., Fildes B. N., Charlton J. L., Day R. H. (2005), Crossing Roads Safely: An Experimental Study of Age Differences in Gap Selection by Pedestrians, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37(5), Elsevier, 962-971 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2005.04.017
  12. Park J. T., Choi B. B., Lee S. B. (2010), A Study on the Characteristics of Traffic Accidents for the Elderly Pedestrians on Rural Highways, J. Korean Soc. Transp., 28(2), Korean Society of Transportation, 155-162.
  13. Police Agency (2014), The 2014 Edition Car Accident Statistics (2014년 교통사고통계).
  14. UN (2005), Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat, World Population Prospects: The 2006 Revision and World Urbanization Prospects, the 2005 Revision, https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/, 2016.06.17.
  15. Yang J. S. (2005), Prevention of Road Traffic Accident Driving Behavior Intervention Technical Analysis, Human Ergonomics, 11(3), Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 38-40.

Cited by

  1. 고령자 보행행태를 고려한 상충위험정보 제공방법 설계 vol.12, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.13067/jkiecs.2017.12.1.9
  2. 고령/비고령 보행자와 차량간의 상충위험도 측정연구 vol.35, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7470/jkst.2017.35.6.499
  3. 다인 가구와의 비교를 통한 1인 가구의 통근수단 선택 결정요인의 차별적 특성의 파악 vol.11, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5804/lhij.2020.11.2.1