DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Finite element analysis of maxillary incisor displacement during en-masse retraction according to orthodontic mini-implant position

  • Song, Jae-Won (Department of Orthodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dental Science, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Lim, Joong-Ki (Private Practice) ;
  • Lee, Kee-Joon (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Sung, Sang-Jin (Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Chun, Youn-Sic (Department of Orthodontics, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital) ;
  • Mo, Sung-Seo (Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, St. Paul's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • Received : 2015.06.16
  • Accepted : 2016.01.08
  • Published : 2016.07.25

Abstract

Objective: Orthodontic mini-implants (OMI) generate various horizontal and vertical force vectors and moments according to their insertion positions. This study aimed to help select ideal biomechanics during maxillary incisor retraction by varying the length in the anterior retraction hook (ARH) and OMI position. Methods: Two extraction models were constructed to analyze the three-dimentional finite element: a first premolar extraction model (Model 1, M1) and a residual 1-mm space post-extraction model (Model 2, M2). The OMI position was set at a height of 8 mm from the arch wire between the second maxillary premolar and the first molar (low OMI traction) or at a 12-mm height in the mesial second maxillary premolar (high OMI traction). Retraction force vectors of 200 g from the ARH (-1, +1, +3, and +6 mm) at low or high OMI traction were resolved into X-, Y-, and Z-axis components. Results: In M1 (low and high OMI traction) and M2 (low OMI traction), the maxillary incisor tip was extruded, but the apex was intruded, and the occlusal plane was rotated clockwise. Significant intrusion and counter-clockwise rotation in the occlusal plane were observed under high OMI traction and -1 mm ARH in M2. Conclusions: This study observed orthodontic tooth movement according to the OMI position and ARH height, and M2 under high OMI traction with short ARH showed retraction with maxillary incisor intrusion.

Keywords

References

  1. Cha BK, Lee JY, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Yoshida N. Analysis of tooth movement in extraction cases using three-dimensional reverse engineering technology. Eur J Orthod 2007;29:325-31. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjm019
  2. Cho MY, Choi JH, Lee SP, Baek SH. Three-dimensional analysis of the tooth movement and arch dimension changes in Class I malocclusions treated with first premolar extractions: a guideline for virtual treatment planning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:747-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.11.033
  3. Lai EH, Yao CC, Chang JZ, Chen I, Chen YJ. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:636-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.05.017
  4. Upadhyay M, Yadav S, Nagaraj K, Patil S. Treatment effects of mini-implants for en-masse retraction of anterior teeth in bialveolar dental protrusion patients: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:18-29.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.025
  5. Upadhyay M, Yadav S, Patil S. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:803-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.10.025
  6. Lim JK. Gummy smile correction using mini implant. Korean J Clin Orthod 2010;9:14-31.
  7. Lee KJ, Park YC, Hwang CJ, Kim YJ, Choi TH, Yoo HM, et al. Displacement pattern of the maxillary arch depending on miniscrew position in sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:224-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.05.020
  8. Kim SJ, Chun YS, Jung SH, Park SH. Three dimensional analysis of tooth movement using different types of maxillary molar distalization appliances. Korean J Orthod 2008;38:376-87. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2008.38.6.376
  9. Lee HA, Park YC. Treatment and posttreatment changes following intrusion of maxillary posterior teeth with miniscrew implants for open bite correction. Korean J Orthod 2008;38:31-40. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2008.38.1.31
  10. Mo SS, Kim SH, Sung SJ, Chung KR, Chun YS, Kook YA, et al. Factors controlling anterior torque with C-implants depend on en-masse retraction without posterior appliances: biocreative therapy type II technique. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:e183-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.09.023
  11. Tominaga JY, Tanaka M, Koga Y, Gonzales C, Kobayashi M, Yoshida N. Optimal loading conditions for controlled movement of anterior teeth in sliding mechanics. Angle Orthod 2009;79:1102-7. https://doi.org/10.2319/111608-587R.1
  12. Sia S, Shibazaki T, Koga Y, Yoshida N. Experimental determination of optimal force system required for control of anterior tooth movement in sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:36-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.01.034
  13. Kojima Y, Fukui H. A finite element simulation of initial movement, orthodontic movement, and the centre of resistance of the maxillary teeth connected with an archwire. Eur J Orthod 2014;36:255-61. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjr123
  14. Chong DR, Jang YJ, Chun YS, Jung SH, Lee SK. The evaluation of rotational movements of maxillary posterior teeth using three dimensional images in cases of extraction of maxillary first premolar. Korean J Orthod 2005;35:451-8.
  15. Jeong GM, Sung SJ, Lee KJ, Chun YS, Mo SS. Finite-element investigation of the center of resistance of the maxillary dentition. Korean J Orthod 2009;39:83-94. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2009.39.2.83
  16. Germane N, Bentley BE Jr, Isaacson RJ. Three biologic variables modifying faciolingual tooth angulation by straight-wire appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:312-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(89)90350-8
  17. Andrews LF. The straight-wire appliance. Explained and compared. J Clin Orthod 1976;10:174-95.
  18. Coolidge ED. The thickness of the human periodontal membrane. J Am Dent Assoc Dent Cosm 1937;24:1260-70. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1937.0229
  19. Tanne K, Sakuda M, Burstone CJ. Three-dimensional finite element analysis for stress in the periodontal tissue by orthodontic forces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;92:499-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(87)90232-0
  20. Sung EH, Kim SJ, Chun YS, Park YC, Yu HS, Lee KJ. Distalization pattern of whole maxillary dentition according to force application points. Korean J Orthod 2015;45:20-8. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2015.45.1.20
  21. Marcuschamer E, Tsukiyama T, Griffin TJ, Arguello E, Gallucci GO, Magne P. Anatomical crown width/length ratios of worn and unworn maxillary teeth in Asian subjects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2011;31:495-503.
  22. Brook AH, Holt RD. The relationship of crown length to root length in permanent maxillary central incisors. Proc Br Paedod Soc 1978;8:17-20.
  23. Sia S, Koga Y, Yoshida N. Determining the center of resistance of maxillary anterior teeth subjected to retraction forces in sliding mechanics. An in vivo study. Angle Orthod 2007;77:999-1003. https://doi.org/10.2319/112206-478
  24. Sung SJ, Jang GW, Chun YS, Moon YS. Effective en-masse retraction design with orthodontic mini-implant anchorage: a finite element analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:648-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.036
  25. van Steenbergen E, Burstone CJ, Prahl-Andersen B, Aartman IH. The relation between the point of force application and flaring of the anterior segment. Angle Orthod 2005;75:730-5.
  26. Choy K, Kim KH, Burstone CJ. Initial changes of centres of rotation of the anterior segment in response to horizontal forces. Eur J Orthod 2006;28:471-4. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjl023
  27. Park HS, Lee SK, Kwon OW. Group distal movement of teeth using microscrew implant anchorage. Angle Orthod 2005;75:602-9.
  28. Park HM, Kim BH, Yang IH, Baek SH. Preliminary three-dimensional analysis of tooth movement and arch dimension change of the maxillary dentition in Class II division 1 malocclusion treated with first premolar extraction: conventional anchorage vs. mini-implant anchorage. Korean J Orthod 2012;42:280-90. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2012.42.6.280

Cited by

  1. Maxillary anterior en masse retraction using different antero-posterior position of mini screw: a 3D finite element study vol.17, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-016-0143-z
  2. Maxillary Corticotomies With Bone-to-Bone Retraction and Mandibular Segmental Osteotomy for Correcting an Anterior Double Protrusion vol.28, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000003925
  3. Finite Element Analysis of Stress in Maxillary Dentition during En-masse Retraction with Implant Anchorage vol.60, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2209/tdcpublication.2017-0055
  4. Effect of archwire stiffness and friction on maxillary posterior segment displacement during anterior segment retraction: A three-dimensional finite element analysis vol.49, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2019.49.6.393
  5. Biomechanical effects of corticotomy facilitated orthodontic anterior retraction: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis vol.23, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2020.1719403
  6. Mechanical environment for lower canine T-loop retraction compared to en-masse space closure with a power-arm attached to either the canine bracket or the archwire vol.90, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2319/050120-377.1