DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Numerical Analysis on Removal Efficiency of Water Droplets in a Curved Vane Mist Eliminator with Consideration of Evaporation and Condensation at Surface of Droplets

액적 표면에서 증발 및 응축을 고려한 곡면 형상 액적 제거장치의 제거 효율에 대한 수치 해석

  • Song, Dong Keun (Department of Eco-Machinery Systems, Environmental and Energy Systems Research Division, Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials)
  • 송동근 (한국기계연구원 환경에너지기계연구본부 환경시스템연구실)
  • Received : 2016.11.11
  • Accepted : 2016.12.25
  • Published : 2016.12.31

Abstract

Removal of water contents in a gas is needed in industrial field of gas processing related on energy production/conversion, and environmental treatment. Inertial separators are economic devices for separating droplets from the gas stream. For accurate understanding of removal process in a curved vane mist eliminator, a numerical model including turbulent dispersion, evaporation and condensation of water vapor at surface of droplets is required. A two-stage curved vane mist eliminator has been modeled, and fluid flow of mixture of air and water vapor and droplet trajectories were solved simultaneously with taking into account two-way coupling. Removal efficiency of droplets with various inlet condition of relative humidities (RH, 40%, 90%, and 100%) were compared. As RH increased, the effect of evaporation decreased and inertial separation efficiencies of droplets obtained increased especially for droplets of diameter below 10 micrometers.

Keywords

References

  1. Burkholz, A. (1981). Mist Elimination, in Air Pollution Control (Part 4), Bragg, G.M. and Strauss, W. (eds.), Wiley Interscience, New York, USA.
  2. Estakhrsar, M.H.H., and Rafee, R. (2013). Effect of drainage channel dimensions on the performance of wave-plate mist eliminators. Korean J. Chem. Eng, 30(6). 1301-1311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-013-0032-9
  3. Galletti, C., Brunazzi, E., and Tognotti, L. (2008). A numerical model for gas flow and droplet motion in wave-plate mist eliminators with drainage channels. Chem. Eng. Sci., 63. 5639-5652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2008.08.013
  4. James, P.W., Azzopardi, B.J., Wang, Y., and Hughes, J.P. (2005). A model for liquid film flow and separation in a wave-plate mist eliminator. Chem. Eng. Research and Design, 83. 469-477. https://doi.org/10.1205/cherd.03363
  5. James, P.W., Wang, Y., Azzopardi, B.J., and Hughes, J.P. (2003). The role of drainage channels in the performance of wave-plate mist eliminators. IchemE, 81. 639-648. https://doi.org/10.1205/026387603322150499
  6. Lee, S.Y., Hong, W.S., Shin, W., Kim, G., and Song, D.K. (2013). Evaluation of Removal Efficiency of Water Contents using Inertial Impaction Separator. Par. Aerosol Res., 9(1). 23-29. https://doi.org/10.11629/jpaar.2013.9.1.023
  7. Morsi, S.A., and Alexander, A.J. (1972). An Investigation of Particle Trajectories in Two-Phase Flow Systems. J. Fluid Mech., 55(2). 193-208. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112072001806
  8. Song, D.K., Lee, S.Y., Hong, W.S., Shin, W., Kim, G., and Kim, H. (2013). Removal efficiency of water contents using inertial impaction separators with change in relative humidity. Par. Aerosol Res., 9(4). 247-252. https://doi.org/10.11629/jpaar.2013.9.4.247
  9. Venkatesan, G., Kulasekharan, N., and Iniyan, S. (2014). Numerical analysis of curved vane demisters in estimating water droplet separation efficiency. Desalination, 339, 40-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.02.013
  10. Zamora, B., and Kaiser, A.S. (2011). Comparative efficiency evaluations of four types of cooling drift eliminator, by numerical investigation. Chem. Eng. Sci., 66. 1232-1245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2010.12.023