The Correlation between The Size and Location of Vocal Polyp and Voice Quality, Before and After Laryngeal Microsurgery

후두미세수술 전후 성대 용종의 크기 및 위치가 음성의 질의 변화에 미치는 영향

  • Han, Won Gue (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Min-Su (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Oh, Kyung Ho (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Woo, Jeung Soo (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jung, Kwang Yoon (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kwon, Soon Young (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine)
  • 한원규 (고려대학교 의과대학 안산병원 이비인후과학교실) ;
  • 김민수 (고려대학교 의과대학 안산병원 이비인후과학교실) ;
  • 오경호 (고려대학교 의과대학 안산병원 이비인후과학교실) ;
  • 우정수 (고려대학교 의과대학 구로병원 이비인후과학교실) ;
  • 정광윤 (고려대학교 의과대학 안암병원 이비인후과학교실) ;
  • 권순영 (고려대학교 의과대학 안산병원 이비인후과학교실)
  • Received : 2016.05.18
  • Accepted : 2016.06.15
  • Published : 2016.12.30

Abstract

Background and Objectives : Vocal polyps are caused by inflammation induced by stress or irritation. Many patients with vocal polyps complain voice discomfort. For vocal polyps, surgery such as laryngeal microsurgery has been the mainstay of management. We analyzed the clinical features of vocal polyps, and how the size and location of vocal polyps affect the outcomes of surgery. Methods : We retrospectively reviewed 42 patients from March 2014 to December 2015, who were diagnosed as unilateral single vocal polyp. When we operated on a vocal polyp with laryngeal microscopy, we measured their size and location. The quality of voice was evaluated by GRABS scale, jitter, shimmer, NHR (noise to harmonic ratio), MPT (maximum phonation time), and VHI (voice handicap index) before operation and 4 weeks after operation. Results : When we divided the patients into large-sized vocal polyp group (the longest length >3 mm) and small-sized vocal polyp group (the longest length ${\leq}3mm$), all parameter differences tend to be greater at large sized vocal polyp. However, these differences were not statistically significant (p>0.05). When we divided into two groups depending on the volume of vocal polyp, no distinct tendency was found. When we compared the location (anterior, mid and posterior) of vocal polyp with the improvement of voice quality, more change was found at mid portion vocal polyp, except the difference of VHI. However, these differences were also not statistically significant (p>0.05). Conclusion : All parameter differences tend to be greater at large vocal polyp and polyp of the mid location.

Keywords

References

  1. Hah JH, Sim S, An SY, Sung MW, Choi HG. Evaluation of the prevalence of and factors associated with laryngeal diseases among the general population. Laryngoscope 2015;125:2536-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25424
  2. Lee KW, Chiang FY. Current practice and feasibility in microlaryngeal surgery: microsurgical pressing excision technique. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;17:431-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0b013e3283317f50
  3. Sulica L, Behrman A. Management of benign vocal fold lesions: a survey of current opinion and practice. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2003;112:827-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940311201001
  4. Petrovic-Lazic M, Babac S, Vukovic M, Kosanovic R, Ivankovic Z. Acoustic voice analysis of patients with vocal fold polyp. J Voice 2011;25:94-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.04.002
  5. Toran KC, Vaidhya BK. Objective voice analysis for vocal polyps following microlaryngeal phonosurgery. Kathmandu Univ Med J 2010;8:185-9.
  6. Cho KJ, Nam IC, Hwang YS, Shim MR, Park JO, Cho JH, et al. Analysis of factors influencing voice quality and therapeutic approaches in vocal polyp patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011;268:1321-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1618-7
  7. Jeong WJ, Lee SJ, Lee WY, Chang H, Ahn SH. Conservative management for vocal fold polyps. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;140:448-52. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2014.243
  8. Nakagawa H, Miyamoto M, Kusuyama T, Mori Y, Fukuda H. Resolution of vocal fold polyps with conservative treatment. J Voice 2012;26:e107-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.07.005
  9. Jensen JB, Rasmussen N. Phonosurgery of vocal fold polyps, cysts and nodules is beneficial. Dan Med J 2013;60:A4577.
  10. Sanada T, Tanaka S, Hibi S, Terasawa R, Hirano M, Hirade Y. [Relationships between the degree of lesion and that of vocal dysfunction in vocal fold polyp]. Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho 1990;93:388-92. https://doi.org/10.3950/jibiinkoka.93.388
  11. Kunieda C, Kanazawa T, Komazawa D, Ree Y, Indo K, Akagi Y. et al. [The Correlation between the Size of Vocal Polyps, Vocal Nodules and Vocal Dysfunction, before and after Laryngeal Microsurgery]. Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho 2015;118(10):1212-9. https://doi.org/10.3950/jibiinkoka.118.1212
  12. Dursun G, Karatayli-Ozgursoy S, Ozgursoy OB, Tezcaner ZC, Coruh I, Kilic MA. Influence of the macroscopic features of vocal fold polyps on the quality of voice: a retrospective review of 101 cases. Ear Throat J 2010;89:E12-7.
  13. Uloza V, Kaseta M, Pribuisiene R, Saferis V, Jokuzis V, Gelzinis A, et al. Quantitative microlaryngoscopic measurements of vocal fold polyps, glottal gap and their relation to vocal function. Medicina 2008;44:266-72. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina44040034