Food Industry And Nutrition (식품산업과 영양)

The Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition (한국식품영양과학회)
권호 표지

Measurement of Sensory Responses: Understanding Scaling and Data

감각 특성의 계량: 척도와 데이터의 이해

  • Hong, Jae-Hee (Department of Foods and Nutrition, Kookmin University)
  • Published : 2016.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Keywords

References

  1. Lim J. 2011. Hedonic scaling: A review of methods and theory. Food Qual Prefer 22: 733-747.
  2. Zar JH. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. 4th ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA. p 1-5.
  3. Valentin D, Chollet S, Lelievre M, Abdi H. 2012. Quick and dirty but still pretty good: a review of new descriptive methods in food science. Int J Food Sci Technol 47: 1563-1578. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.03022.x
  4. Jones LV, Peryam DR, Thurstone LL. 1955. Development of a scale for measuring soldiers' food preferences. J Food Sci 20: 512-520. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1955.tb16862.x
  5. Lawless HT, Heymann H. 2010. Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices. 2nd ed. Springer, New York, NY, USA.
  6. Bartoshuk LM, Fast K, Snyder DJ. 2005. Differences in our sensory worlds: invalid comparisons with labeled scales. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 14: 122-125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00346.x
  7. Borg G. 1982. A category scale with ratio properties for intermodal and interindividual comparisons. In Psychophysical Judgment and the Process of Perception. Geissler HG, Petzold P, eds. North-Holland Publishing Company, New York, NY, USA. p 25-34.
  8. Green BG, Shaffer GS, Gilmore MM. 1993. Derivation and evaluation of a semantic scale of oral sensation magnitude with apparent ratio properties. Chem Senses 18: 683-702. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/18.6.683
  9. Green BG, Dalton P, Cowart B, Shaffer G, Rankin K, Higgins J. 1996. Evaluating the 'Labeled Magnitude Scale' for measuring sensations of taste and smell. Chem Senses 21: 323-334. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/21.3.323
  10. Bartoshuk LM, Duffy VB, Green BG, Hoffman HJ, Ko CW, Lucchina LA, Marks LE, Snyder DJ, Weiffenbach JM. 2004. Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: The gLMS versus magnitude matching. Physiol Behav 82: 109-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.02.033
  11. Luce RD, Krumhansl CL. 1988. Measurement, scaling, and psychophysics. In Steven's Handbook of Experimental Psychology. Atkinson RC, Herrstein RJ, Lindgey G, Luce RD, eds. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA. p 3-73.
  12. Orne MT. 1962. On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. Am Psychol 17: 776-783. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043424
  13. Smith EE, Kosslyn SM. 2007. Cognitive Psychology: Mind and Brain. Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
  14. Lawless HT. 1983. Contextual effect in category ratings. J Test Eval 11: 346-349. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE10694J
  15. Furnham A. 1986. Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation. Pers Individ Dif 7: 385-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(86)90014-0
  16. Meilgaard MC, Civille GV, Carr BT. 2007. Sensory Evaluation Techniques. 4th ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
  17. Poulton EC. 1989. Bias in Quantifying Judgments. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hove and London, UK.
  18. Frank RA, van der Klaauw NJ, Schifferstein HN. 1993. Both perceptual and conceptual factors influence tasteodor and taste-taste interactions. Percept Psychophys 54: 343-354. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205269
  19. Diamond J, Lawless HT. 2001. Context effects and reference standards with magnitude estimation and the labeled magnitude scale. J Sens Stud 16: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2001.tb00286.x