DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Using Fuzzy Numbers in Quality Function Deployment Optimization

QFD 최적화에서 퍼지 넘버의 이용

  • Yoo, Jaewook (Department of Business Administration, Dong-A University)
  • 유재욱 (동아대학교 경영대학 경영학과)
  • Received : 2016.03.14
  • Accepted : 2016.06.17
  • Published : 2016.06.30

Abstract

Quality function deployment (QFD) is a widely adopted customer-oriented product development methodology by translating customer requirements (CRs) into technical attributes (TAs), and subsequently into parts characteristics, process plans, and manufacturing operations. A main activity in QFD planning process is the determination of the target levels of TAs of a product so as to achieve a high level of customer satisfaction using the data or information included in the houses of quality (HoQ). Gathering the information or data for a HoQ may involve various inputs in the form of linguistic data which are inherently vague, or human perception, judgement and evaluation for the information and data. This research focuses on how to deal with this kind of impreciseness in QFD optimization. In this paper, it is assumed as more realistic situation that the values of TAs are taken as discrete, which means each TA has a few alternatives, as well as the customer satisfaction level acquired by each alternative of TAs and related cost are determined based on subjective or imprecise information and/or data. To handle these imprecise information and/or data, an approach using some basic definitions of fuzzy sets and the signed distance method for ranking fuzzy numbers is proposed. An example of a washing machine under two-segment market is provided for illustrating the proposed approach, and in this example, the difference between the optimal solution from the fuzzy model and that from the crisp model is compared as well as the advantage of using the fuzzy model is drawn.

Keywords

References

  1. Akao, Y., Quality function deployment : integrating customer requirements into product design, Cambridge, MA, Productivity Press, 1990.
  2. Buyukozkan, G., Feyzioglu, O., and Ruan, D., Fuzzy group decision-making to multiple preference formats in quality function deployment, Computers in Industry, 2007, Vol. 58, No. 5, pp. 392-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2006.07.002
  3. Chen, L.H. and Ko, W.C., Fuzzy linear programming models for new product design using QFD with FMEA, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2009, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp.633-647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2007.11.029
  4. Chen, L.H. and Ko, W.C., Fuzzy linear programming models for NPD using a four-phase QFD activity process based on the means-end chain concept, European Journal of Operations Research, 2010, Vol. 201, No. 2, pp. 619-632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.03.010
  5. Chen, L.H. and Weng, M.C., A fuzzy model for exploiting quality function deployment, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2003, Vol. 38, No. 5-6, pp. 559-570. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7177(03)90027-6
  6. Chen, Y.J., Tang, J., and Fung, R.Y.K., Fuzzy regression- based mathematical programming model for quality function deployment, International Journal of Production Research, 2004, Vol. 42, pp. 1009-1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540310001619623
  7. Chen, Y., Fung, R.Y.K., and Tang, J., Fuzzy expected value modelling approach for determining target value of engineering characteristics in QFD, Int. J. Prod. Res., 2005, Vol. 43, No. 17, pp. 3583-3604. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540500032046
  8. Delice, E.K. and Gungor, Z., Determining design requirements in QFD using fuzzy mixed-integer goal programming : application of a decision support system, International Journal of Production Research, 2013, Vol. 51, No. 21, pp. 6378-6396. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.803625
  9. Erol, I. and Ferrel, W.G., A methodology for selection problems with multiple, conflicting objectives and both qualitative and quantitative criteria, International Journal of Production Economics, 2003, Vol. 86, No. 3, pp. 187-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00049-5
  10. Fung, R.Y.K., Tang, J., Tu, Y., and Wang, D., Product design resources optimization using a non-linear fuzzy quality function deployment model, Int. J. of Production Research, 2002, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 585-599. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540110061634
  11. Hauser, J.R. and Clausing, D., The house of quality, Harvard Business Review, 1988, Vol. 66, No. 3, pp. 63- 73.
  12. Kahraman, C., Ertay, T., and Buyukozkan, G., A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach, European Journal of Operations Research, 2006, Vol. 171, No. 2, pp. 390-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.09.016
  13. Karsak, E.E., Fuzzy multiple objective decision making approach to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment, International Journal of Production Research, 2004a, Vol. 42, No. 18, pp. 3957-3974. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540410001703998
  14. Karsak, E.E., Fuzzy multiple objective programming framework to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 2004b, Vol. 47, pp. 149-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2004.06.001
  15. Kaufmann, A. and Gupta, M.M., Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic theory and applications, van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1991.
  16. Kim, K.J., Moskowitz, H., Dhingra, A., and Evans, G., Fuzzy multicriteria models for quality function deployment, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2000, Vol. 121, No. 3, pp. 504- 518. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00048-X
  17. Lai, X., Xie, M., and Tan, K.C., Dynamic Programming for QFD Optimization, Quality and Reliability Engineering, 2005, Vol. 21, No. 8, pp. 769-780. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.685
  18. Lin, F.T. and Yao, J.S., Using fuzzy numbers in knapsack problems, European Journal of Operations Research, 2001, Vol. 135, pp. 158-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00310-6
  19. Liu, S.H., Rating Design Requirements in fuzzy quality function deployment via a mathematical programming approach, International Journal of Production Research, 2005, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 497-513. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020754042000270395
  20. Sener, Z. and E. E. Karsak, A decision model for setting target levels in quality function deployment using nonlinear programming-based fuzzy regression and optimization, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2010, Vol. 48, pp. 1173-1184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2330-2
  21. Sohn, S.Y. and Choi, I.S., Fuzzy QFD for supply chain management with reliability consideration, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2001, Vol. 72, No. 3, pp. 327-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00022-9
  22. Tang, J., Richard, Y.K., Baodong, X., and Wang, D., A new approach to quality function deployment planning with financial consideration, Computers and Operations Research, 2002, Vol. 29, pp. 1447-1463. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0548(01)00041-7
  23. Vanegas, L.V. and Labib, A.W., Fuzzy Quality function deployment Model for deriving optimum targets, International Journal of Production Research, 2001, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540010005079
  24. Yao, J.S. and Wu, K.M., Ranking fuzzy numbers based on decomposition principle and signed distance, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, Vol. 116, pp. 275-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00122-5
  25. Yoo, J., Dynamic programming approach for determining optimal levels of technical attributes in QFD under multi-segment market, Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2015, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 120-128. https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2015.38.2.120
  26. Yu, E.J. and Kwak, C., Service Development using Fuzzy QFD in the banking industry, Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management, 2015, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 103-124. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2015.43.1.103
  27. Zhou, M., Fuzzy logic and optimization models for implementing QFD, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 1998, Vol. 35, No. 1-2, pp. 237-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-8352(98)00073-4
  28. Zimmermann, H.-J., Fuzzy Set Theory and its Application, Fourth Edition, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, New York, 2001.