DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Environmental Fatigue Evaluation of Top-Mounted In-Core Instrumentation Nozzle

상부 탑재형 노내계측기 노즐의 환경피로평가

  • Yoon, Hyo-Sub (KEPCO Engineering and Construction Company, Mechanical System Engineering Group) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Min (KEPCO Engineering and Construction Company, Mechanical System Engineering Group) ;
  • Maeng, Cheol-Soo (KEPCO Engineering and Construction Company, Mechanical System Engineering Group) ;
  • Kim, Gee-Seok (KEPCO Engineering and Construction Company, Mechanical System Engineering Group) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Min (KEPCO Engineering and Construction Company, Mechanical System Engineering Group)
  • 윤효섭 (한국전력기술(주) 기계설계그룹) ;
  • 김종민 (한국전력기술(주) 기계설계그룹) ;
  • 맹철수 (한국전력기술(주) 기계설계그룹) ;
  • 김기석 (한국전력기술(주) 기계설계그룹) ;
  • 김현민 (한국전력기술(주) 기계설계그룹)
  • Received : 2016.03.28
  • Accepted : 2016.05.18
  • Published : 2016.06.30

Abstract

The development of Top-Mounted In-Core Instrumentation(TM-ICI) is an ongoing project to reduce the risk due to severe accidents by inserting the instrumentation into a reactor closure head instead of a reactor bottom head. As part of this project, environmental fatigue analyses for TM-ICI nozzle have been performed using two methods of NUREG/CR-6909 and Code Case N-761. TM-ICI nozzle is subjected to transient loads for level A, level B and test conditions that should be evaluated for a fatigue analysis. It is found that a cumulative usage factor considering reactor coolant environment for TM-ICI nozzle is evaluated as less than 1, which is ASME Code allowable criteria of a fatigue analysis.

상부 탑재형 노내계측기(TM-ICI) 개발은 원자로하부헤드 대신 원자로상부헤드로 계측기를 삽입함으로써 중대사고 위험을 줄이기 위해 진행 중이다. 이 개발 과제의 일환으로, NUREG/CR-6909와 Code Case N-761의 두 방법에 따라 TM-ICI 노즐에 대한 환경피로평가가 수행되었다. TM-ICI 노즐은 level A, level B 및 시험 조건에서의 과도조건에 따른 하중을 받는데 이에 대해 피로평가를 해야 한다. 원자로냉각재환경이 고려된 TM-ICI 노즐의 누적사용계수는 1이하로 평가되었고, 이는 ASME Code 허용기준을 만족한다.

Keywords

References

  1. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2015 Edition) ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code-An International Code, Section II, Part D and Section III, Division 1-Subsection NB and Appendices.
  2. ANSYS Finite Element Program (2014) ANSYS Mechanical APDL, Version 15.0, ANSYS Inc..
  3. Armin, R., Matthias, H., Jurgen, R., Paul, W. (2014) Environmental Influences on the Fatigue Assessment of Austenitic and Ferritic Steel Components including Welds, Proc. ASME 2014 Press. Vessels & Pip. Div. Conf., PVP2014-28728, California.
  4. Case of ASME Bolier and Pressure Vessel Code (2010) Fatigue Design Curves for Light Water Reactor (LWR) Environments, Code Case N-761.
  5. Frank, K., Mark, S.B. (1993) Principles of Heat Transfer, West Publishing Company, Fifth edition, p.475.
  6. Lee, Y.J., Kim, J.M., Kim, H.M., Lee, D.H., Chung, C.K. (2014) Structural Integrity Evaluation of Reactor Pressure Vessel Bottom Head without Penetration Nozzles in Core Melting Accident, J. Comput. Struct. Eng. Inst. Korea, 27(3), pp.191-198. https://doi.org/10.7734/COSEIK.2014.27.3.191
  7. Mark, A.G., Matthew, C.S., David, H.R., E. Lyles, C. (2014) Strain Rate Calculation Approach in Environmental Fatigue Evaluations, J. Press. Vessel Tech., 136, pp.045001-1-5. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4026113
  8. Omesh, C., Gray, L.S. (2014) Effect of LWR Coolant Environments on the Fatigue Life of Reactor Materials, Argonne National Laboratory, NUREG/CR-6909, Rev. 1(Draft), App. A and C.
  9. Seiji, A., Kunimitsu, T., Masanori, T. (2014) Environmental Fatigue Evaluation for Class 1 Components of an Advanced PWR, Pro. ASME 2014 Press. Vessels & Pip. Div. Conf., PVP2014-28300, California.
  10. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (2014) Guidelines for Evaluating the Effects of Light-Water Reactor Coolant Environments in Fatigue Analyses of Metal Components, Regulatory Guide 1.207, Rev. 1(Draft DG-1309), Section C.