The Journal of Fisheries Business Administration (수산경영론집)

The Korean Society of Fisheries Business Administration (한국수산경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analyzing Separation and Weight of Partial Equilibrium Welfare Effects and Spillover Effects of Restriction on the Fishery Market

수산물시장규제의 부분균형후생효과와 파급효과의 분리와 비중분석

  • Park, Hoan-Jae (Division of Economics and International Trade, Catholic University of Daegu)
  • 박환재 (대구가톨릭대학교 경제통상학부)
  • Received : 2016.02.24
  • Accepted : 2016.03.28
  • Published : 2016.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze theoretically and empirically spillover effects of fishery quota on related markets through their demand curves. Theoretically, the spillover effects of a change in quota can be captured through the directly distorted market alone by computing surpluses associated with the new and old equilibrium. This study estimates empirically demand functions in the context of both the partial equilibrium and general equilibrium. The spillover effect can be computed from the difference between these two estimates. The econometric methodology to estimate the demand curves in the context of general equilibrium is presented and illustrated. The empirical result of fishery markets shows that spillover effects transmitted across other markets are not small and approximately account for 43.3% of the partial equilibrium welfare effects.

Keywords

References

  1. Bank of Korea, Nation Income Account, 1970-2013.
  2. Canning, P. N. and Vroomen, H. (1996), "Measuring Welfare Impacts from Equilibrium Supply and Demand Curves: An Antidumping Case Study," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78, 1026-1033. https://doi.org/10.2307/1243858
  3. Granger, C. W. J. (1988), "Causality, Cointegration, and Control," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 551-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(88)90055-3
  4. Granger, C. W. J. (2009), "In Praise of Pragmatics in Econometrics," in J. Castle and N. Shephard (eds.), The Methodology and Practice of Econometrics: A Festschrift in Honour of David F. Hendry, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 59-87.
  5. Harberger, A. C. (1971), "Three Basic Postulates for Applied Welfare Economics: An Interpretive Essay," Journal of Economic Literature, 9, 785-797.
  6. Jang, C. B. and Jang, Y. S. (2011), "Study on Value and Market Segment of Aquatic Products," The Journal of Fisheries Business Administration, 42 (2), 100-125.
  7. Just, R. E. and Hueth, D. L. (1979), "Multimarket Welfare Measurement," American Economic Review, 69, 947-954.
  8. Just, R. E., Hueth, D. L. and Schumitz, A. (1982), Applied Welfare Economics and Public Policy, Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  9. Kim, D. H. (2013), "Analyzing Market Integration of wild Caught Fish species," The Journal of Fisheries Business Administration, 44 (1), 71-79. https://doi.org/10.12939/FBA.2013.44.1.071
  10. Kim, S. K. (2008), Desirable Direction of Reform of Korean Consumption Tax, KDI, 1-300.
  11. Korean Rural Economic Research Institute, Food Balance Sheet, 1970-2013.
  12. Korean Ocean Fishery development Institute, Annual Statistics on Cooperative Sales of Fishery Product, 1970-2013.
  13. Lee, Y. G. (1996), "Measurement of Welfare Effect of Government Intervention on Multi-Market," Economic Review, 44 (3), 17-33.
  14. Park, H. J. (2006), "General Equilibrium Welfare Effect of Taxation," Public Finance, 20 (2), 1-32.
  15. Thurman, W. N. and Easley, J. E. (1992), "Valuing Changes in Commercial Fishery Harvests: A General Equilibrium Derived Demand Analysis," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22, 226-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(92)90030-Z
  16. Yang, S. Y., Guak, C. G. and Mun, J. Y. (2000), "Analysis of Spillover Effect of Alchohol Tax Adjustment and Debate on Tax of SoJu-Whisky," Economic Review, 48 (1), 195-221.