한국의사학회지 (The Journal of Korean Medical History)

한국의사학회 (Korean Society of the Medical History)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한의약지식재산보호를 위한 국제협약 및 국내현황 조사와 그 대응방안에 대한 소고

The Research on the International Treaties and Domestic Situations to Protect the Intellectual Property of Korean Medicine and Our Countermeasures

  • 이주호 (특허법인강인) ;
  • 김남일 (경희대학교 한의과대학 의사학교실) ;
  • 김동율 (세명대학교 한의과대학 원전의사학교실) ;
  • 김민선 (경희대학교 한의과대학 의사학교실) ;
  • 김연희 (특허법인강인) ;
  • 차웅석 (경희대학교 청강한의학역사문화연구센터) ;
  • 안상우 (한국한의학연구원)
  • Lee, Ju-Ho (KangIn IP & Law) ;
  • Kim, Namil (Dept. of Medical History, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Ryul (Dept. of Korean Medical Classics & Medical History, College of Korean Medicine, Se-Myung University) ;
  • Kim, Min-Seon (Dept. of Medical History, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Youn-Hee (KangIn IP & Law) ;
  • Cha, Wung-Seok (CheongKang Center for History and Culture of Korean Medicine) ;
  • Ahn, Sang-Woo (Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2016.11.18
  • 심사 : 2016.11.30
  • 발행 : 2016.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Traditional medical knowledge and its biological resources, including Korean Medicine, has regarded as an important object of intellectual property rights. International organizations have been discussed and implemented various treaties on how to exercise and protect the property rights of traditional medicines. In Korea, the governmental policies and the academic societies have endeavored to establish the protection method and academic foundations of Korean Medicine's intellectual properties. This study will examine the current situation of discussions in major international organizations and Korean governmental policies related to the protection of traditional medical intellectual properties. Furthermore, this paper will contemplate the possible arguments and countermeasures to protect the traditional knowledge of Korean Medicine. We hope that this study will contribute to find the reasonable and effective ways of protection of Korean Medicine's intellectual property rights.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 이상정, 조상혁, 안효질. 전통의약 분야의 법적･제도적 보장방안 연구. 경희법학. 2001;36(2): 107-156.
  2. 장일무 외 6인. 전통의약관련 전통지식 현황조사 및 지재권 관련 연구조사. 서울대학교 천연물과학연구소. 2002: 12-13.
  3. 안상우, 최환수, 김홍준. 우리 전통의약학 자료의 보호 방안-WIPO의 전통지식에 관한 지적재산권 보호 논의의 대응방안 모색-. 한국한의학연구원 연구보고서. 2003: 41-54.
  4. 고광국. 전통지식의 지적재산권 보호-전통의약지식의 현황, 국제논의 및 보호방안을 중심으로-. 충남대학교 박사학위논문. 2006: 1-234.
  5. 김은진. 한약의 세계화를 위한 지식재산권의 활용방안 -전통지식의 세계적 논의와 특허를 중심으로-. 원광대학교 석사학위논문. 2011: 1-92.
  6. 고광국. 나고야의정서가 전통지식보호에 미치는 영향과 그 대응책 : 한의약에 관한 전통지식을 중심으로. 과학기술법연구. 2013;19(1): 305-352.
  7. 조재신, 김병남. 전통지식･유전자원에 대한 국제적 논의 동향 및 저작권과 특허권에 의한 보호 전략. 법학논총. 2015;35(3): 371-406.
  8. 특허청. 전통의약관련 전통지식현황조사 및 지재권 관련연구. 대전: 특허청. 2002: 1-482.
  9. 한국한의학연구원. 전통의약기술의 보호 및 육성을 위한 기반조성연구. 대전: 한국한의학연구원. 2002: 1-252.
  10. 한국한의학연구원. 전통지식 DB 구축사업 1차년도 산출물(전통지식 논문 국영문DB). 대전: 한국한의학연구원. 2005: 1-422.
  11. 특허청. 전통의약관련 전통지식현황조사 및 지재권 관련연구. 대전: 특허청. 2002: 1-482.
  12. 오윤석. 유전자원과 관련 전통지식의 보호에 관한 국제적 및 국내적 논의에 대한 고찰. 지식재산21. 2004;86: 3-28.
  13. 특허청 전자상거래심사담당관실. 컴퓨터발명 관련 발명 심사기준. 대전: 특허청 전자상거래심사담당관실. 2005: 1-102.
  14. 특허청. 화학분야 산업부문별 심사기준집. 대전: 특허청. 2000.
  15. 특허청. 생명공학분야 특허심사기준 개정 : 최근 심사 쟁점 사항 및 다양한 사례를 반영. 대전: 특허청. 2010.
  16. 특허청. 신지식재산의 동향분석 및 법적 보호방안 기초연구 - 전통지식 관련 국제적 분쟁양태 및 효과적 대응을 위한 연구. 대전: 특허청, 서울: 한국지식재산연구원. 2013: 12, 52.
  17. 특허청. 지식재산 가치평가 방법론 개발: 전통지식을 중심으로. 대전: 특허청, 서울: 한국지식재산연구원. 2012: 1-274.
  18. 홍형득, 임홍탁, 조은설. 우리나라 ABS(나고야의정서) 대응정책의 평가와 과제. 한국기술혁신학회지. 2013;16(2): 520.
  19. 윤선희. 특허법. 파주: 법문사. 2010: 540.
  20. 정상조, 박준석. 지적재산권법. 서울: 홍문사. 2011: 129.
  21. 특허청. WTO TRIPs협정 조문별 해설. 대전: 특허청 국제협력담당관실. 2004: 125, 229.
  22. 육소영. 전통지식의 보호: 정의와 보호의 근거를 중심으로: 한국발명진흥회 지식재산권 연구센터, 중국사회과학원 지재권센터. 유전자원과 전통지식의 법적보호: 2004년도 한.중 국제공동연구 보고서. 서울: 한국발명진흥회 지식재산권 연구센터. 2004: 71-75.
  23. Sean D. Murphy. Biotechnology and International Law. Harvard International Law Journal. 2001;42: 71-72.
  24. Graham Dutfield. Protecting Traditional Knowledge and Folklore. Geneva: ICTSD and UNCTAD. 2003: 34-40.
  25. Merle Alexander, K Chamundeeswari, Alphonse Kambu, Manuel Ruiz, Brendan Tobin. The Role of Registers & Database in the Protection of Traditional Knowledge. Tokyo: United Nations University Institute of Advanced Studies. 2004: 16-18.
  26. Chidi Oguamanam. Documentation and Digitation of Traditional Knowledge and Intangible Cultural Heritage: Challenges and Prospects Cambridge: Intersentia. 2009: 370.
  27. Anil K. Gupta. Conserving Biodiversity and Rewarding Associated Knowledge and Innovation System: Honey Bees Perspective. World Trade Forum, Bern. 1999: 14.
  28. WIPO. Intellectual Property and Traditional Knowledge. Geneva: WIPO. 2008: 29.
  29. J. Janewa OseiTutu. Traditional Knowledge: Is Perpetual Protection a Good Idea?. IDEA. 2010;50(4): 716.
  30. Jean R Homere. Intellectual Property, Trade and Development: A View from the United States: Daniel Gervais. Intellectual Property, Trade and Development: Strategies to Optimize Economic Development in a TRIPs-Plus Era. New York: Oxford University Press. 2007: 349.
  31. David R. Downes. How Intellectual Property could be a Tool to Protect Traditional Knowledge. Columbia J of Environmental L. 2000;25: 268, 273, 276.
  32. Nuno Pires de Carvalho. From the Shaman's Hut to the Patent Office: In Search of Effective Protection for Traditional Knowledge. Paper presented at the Conference Biodiversity and Biotechnology and the Protection of Traditional Knowledge, Washington University School of Law Center for Interdisciplinary Studies. 2003: 74-75.
  33. Graham Dutfield. TRIPs Related Aspects of Traditional Knowledge. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law. 2001;33(2): 245.
  34. WIPO. Intellectual property needs and expectations of traditional knowledge holders. WIPO report on fact-finding missions on intellectual property and traditional knowledge(1988-1999), Geneva. 2001: 201.
  35. "KTKP 소개" 한국전통지식포탈
  36. "List of Parties" Convention on Biological Diversity
  37. "오아시스 소개" 전통의학정보포털
  38. 中国知识产权网 .
  39. "Traditional Knowledge Information Portal" Convention on Biological Diversity
  40. "The PATENTSCOPE database" WIPO
  41. "Recognition of Traditional Knowledge within the Patent System" WIPO
  42. "Bio-piracy of Traditional Knowledge" Traditional Knowledge Digital Library
  43. "TKDL Outcomes against Bio-piracy" Traditional Knowledge Digital Library
  44. "Proposal for the terms of reference for the study by the WIPO secretariat on measures related to the avoidance of the erroneous grant of patents and compliance with existing access and benefit-sharing systems" WIPO
  45. WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific. The Regional Strategy for Traditional Medicine in the Western Pacific(2011-2020). WHO Western Pacific Region PUBLICATION. 2012: 11-13.
  46. Ajazuddin, Shailendra Saraf. Legal regulations of complementary and alternative medicines in different countries. Pharmacognosy Reviews. 2012;6(12): 154. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-7847.99950
  47. Kanchana Kariyawasam, Scott Guy. Intellectual Property Protection of Indigenous Knowledge: Implementing Initiatives at National and Regional Levels. Deakin Law Review. 2007;12(2): 107.
  48. J. Janewa OseiTutu. Emerging Scholars Series: A Sui Generis Regime for Traditional Knowledge: The Cultural Divide in Intellectual Property Law. Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review. 2011;15(1): 173.
  49. Paul Kuruk. Goading a Reluctant Dinosaur: Mutual Recognition Agreements as a Policy Response to the Misappropriation of Foreign Traditional Knowledge in the United States. Pepperdine Law Review. 2007;34(3): 676.
  50. "List of Parties" Convention on Biological Diversity (2016년 11월 16일).
  51. "2016-2017 WIPO IGC mandate" WIPO (2016년 11월 16일).
  52. "INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEE ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND GENETIC RESOURCES, TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE AND FOLKLORE" WIPO
  53. Debora Plehn-Dujowich(May 24, 2016) "WIPO Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore(IGC)" PRISMATIC LAW GROUP
  54. "Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore" WIPO
  55. "WIPO Committee Advances Working Document on Genetic Resources, Though Divisions Remain" ICTSD
  56. "Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions" WIPD
  57. "As the Curtin Draws on TK: WIPO-IGC Session 31 Kicks the Can Further Down the Road" ABS Canada
  58. "Part I-General Provisions and Basic Principles" WTO
  59. "Part II-Standards concerning the availability, scope and use of Intellectual Property Rights" WTO
  60. "Background and the current situation" WTO
  61. "DRAFT MODALITIES FOR TRIPS-RELATED ISSUES" IATP
  62. "Draft decision to enhance mutual supportiveness between the TRIPS Agreement and the Convention on Biological Diversity" WTO
  63. "Clarification on MoE&F notification of October 26, 2009 on biological resources notified as normaly traded commodities" Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India
  64. "THE BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY ACT 2002 AND RULES 2004" Environmental Information System
  65. "Brazil's New Biodiversity Law" THE NATIONAL LAW REVIEW
  66. "Law No. 28216 on the Protection of Access to Peruvian Biological Diversity and Collective Knowledge of Indigenous Peoples" WIPO
  67. "Law Amending, Incorporating and Regulating Miscellaneous Provisions on the Implementation of the Trade Promotion Agreement signed between Peru and United states (Law No. 29316 of January 13, 2009)" WIPO
  68. "生物多様性基本法" Biodiversity Center of Japan

피인용 문헌

  1. Study for the methods of protection of Korean traditional knowledge vol.19, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.16960/jhlr.19.2.201806.33