Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

  • 제17권12호
  • /
  • Pages.5107-5111
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1513-7368(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2476-762X(eISSN)
아시아태평양암예방학회 (Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Estimated Risk of Radiation Induced Contra Lateral Breast Cancer Following Chest Wall Irradiation by Conformal Wedge Field and Forward Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Technique for Post-Mastectomy Breast Cancer Patients

  • Athiyaman, Hemalatha (Department of Radiological Physics, SP Medical College) ;
  • M, Athiyaman (Department of Radiological Physics, SP Medical College) ;
  • Chougule, Arun (Department of Radiological Physics, SMS Medical College) ;
  • Kumar, HS (Department of Radiological Physics, SP Medical College)
  • 발행 : 2016.12.01
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: Epidemiological studies have indicated an increasing incidence of radiation induced secondary cancer (SC) in breast cancer patients after radiotherapy (RT), most commonly in the contra-lateral breast (CLB). The present study was conducted to estimate the SC risk in the CLB following 3D conformal radiotherapy techniques (3DCRT) including wedge field and forward intensity modulated radiotherapy (fIMRT) based on the organ equivalent dose (OED). Material and Methods: RT plans treating the chest wall with conformal wedge field and fIMRT plans were created for 30 breast cancer patients. The risks of radiation induced cancer were estimated for the CLB using dose-response models: a linear model, a linear-plateau model and a bell-shaped model with full dose response accounting for fractionated RT on the basis of OED. Results: The plans were found to be ranked quite differently according to the choice of model; calculations based on a linear dose response model fIMRT predict statistically significant lower risk compared to the enhanced dynamic wedge (EDW) technique (p-0.0089) and a non-significant difference between fIMRT and physical wedge (PW) techniques (p-0.054). The widely used plateau dose response model based estimation showed significantly lower SC risk associated with fIMRT technique compared to both wedge field techniques (fIMRT vs EDW p-0.013, fIMRT vs PW p-0.04). The full dose response model showed a non-significant difference between all three techniques in the view of second CLB cancer. Finally the bell shaped model predicted interestingly that PW is associated with significantly higher risk compared to both fIMRT and EDW techniques (fIMRT vs PW p-0.0003, EDW vs PW p-0.0032). Conclusion: In conclusion, the SC risk estimations of the CLB revealed that there is a clear relation between risk associated with wedge field and fIMRT technique depending on the choice of model selected for risk comparison.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Agarwal G, Pradeep PV, Aggarwal V, Yip CH, Cheung PS(2007). Spectrum of breast cancer in Asian women. World J Surg 31, 1031-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0585-9
  2. Boice JD Jr, Preston D, Davis FG, Monson RR (1991). Frequent chest X-ray fluoroscopy and breast cancer incidence among tuberculosis. Radiat Res, 125, 214-22. https://doi.org/10.2307/3577890
  3. Boice JD Jr, Harvey EB, Blettner M, Stovall M, Flannery JT(1992). Cancer in the contralateral breast after radiotherapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med, 326, 781-85. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199203193261201
  4. Chougule A (1999). Measurement of contra lateral breast doses due to primary irradiation of malignant breast. Ind J of clinical Radio Oncol, 7, 17-20.
  5. Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Level of Ionizing Radiation (2006). Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII, Phase 2 .Washington, D.C: National Academies Press.
  6. Cavey ML, Bayouth JE, Endres EJ, et al (2005).Dosimetric comparison of conventional and forward-planned intensity-modulated techniques for comprehensive locoregional irradiation of post-mastectomy left breast cancers . Med Dosim, 30, 107-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2005.02.002
  7. Dinshaw KA, Sarin R, Budrukkar AN, et al (2006). Safety and feasibility of breast conserving therapy in Indian women: two decades of experience at Tata Memorial hospital. J Surg Oncol, 94, 105-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.20497
  8. Dasu A, Dasu IT, Olofsson J, Karlsson M (2005).The use of risk estimation models for the induction of second cancers following radiotherapy. Acta Oncol, 44, 339-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860510029833
  9. Dores GM, Metayer C, Curtis RE, et al (2002). Second malignant neoplasms among long-term survivors of Hodgkin's disease: a population-based evaluation over 25 years. J Clin Oncol, 20, 3484-94. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2002.09.038
  10. Gao X, Fisher SG, Emami B (2003). Risk of second primary cancer in the contralateral breast in women treated for earlystage breast cancer: A population-based study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 56, 1038-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00203-7
  11. Harvey EB, Brinton LA (1985). Second cancer following cancer of breast in Connecticut,1935-82. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, 68, 99-112.
  12. Haffty BG, Harrold E, Khan AJ(2002).Outcome of conservatively managed early-onset breast cancer by BRCA1/2 status. Lancet, 359, 1471-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08434-9
  13. Hancock SL, Hoppe RT (1996). Long-term complications of treatment and causes of mortality after hodgkin's disease. Semin Radiat Oncol, 6, 225-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4296(96)80018-X
  14. Johansen S, Danielsen T, Olsen DG (2008). Estimated risk for second cancer in the contra-lateral breast following radiation therapy of breast cancer. Acta Oncol, 47, 391-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860701846152
  15. Morganti AG, Cilla S, Gaetano A, et al (2011). Forward planned intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for whole breast postoperative radiotherapy. Is it useful? When?. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 12, 3451.
  16. Obedian E, Fischer DB, Haffty BG (2000). Second malignancies after treatment of early-stage breast cancer: Lumpectomy and radiation therapy versus mastectomy. J Clin Oncol, 18, 2406-12. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2000.18.12.2406
  17. Preston DL, Ron E, Tokuoka S, et al (2007).Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958-1998. Radiat Res, 168, 1-64. https://doi.org/10.1667/RR0763.1
  18. Paganetti H, Athar BS, Moteabbed M, et al (2012). Assessment of radiation-induced second cancer risks in proton therapy and IMRT for organs inside the primary radiation field . Phys Med Biol, 57, 6047-61. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/57/19/6047
  19. Statistic of breast cancer in India: Global Comparison [Internet]. Available from: http://www.breastcancerindia.net/statistics/stat_global.html, Last accessed on 2016 Feb 16.
  20. Stovall M, Smith SA, Langholz BM, et al (2008). Dose to the contralateral breast from RT and risk of second primary breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 72, 1021-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.02.040
  21. Schneider U, Sumila M, Robotka J, et al (2011). Dose-response relationship for breast cancer induction at radiotherapy dose. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol, 6.
  22. Schneider U, Zwahlen D, Ross D, Kaser-Hotz B (2005). Estimation of radiation induced cancer from three dimensional dose distributions :concept of organ equivalent dose. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 61, 1510-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.12.040
  23. Schneider U, Kaser-Hotz B (2005). Radiation risk estimates after radiotherapy: application of the organ equivalent dose concept to plateau dose-response relationships. Radiat Environ Biophys, 44, 235-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-005-0016-1
  24. Swerdlow AJ, Barber JA, Hudson GV, et al (2000). Risk of second malignancy after Hodgkin's disease in a collaborative British cohort: the relation to age at treatment. J Clin Oncol, 18, 498-509. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2000.18.3.498
  25. Walsh L, Ruhm W, Kellerer AM (2004). Cancer risk estimates for X-rays with regard to organ specific doses, part I: All solid cancers combined. Radiat Environ Biophys, 43, 145-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-004-0248-5
  26. Yoon M, Shin DH, Kim J, et al (2011).Craniospinal irradiation techniques: a dosimetric comparison of proton beams with standard and advanced photon radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 81, 637-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.06.039