References
- Alli PM, Ali SZ (2003). Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance-rule out high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: cytopathologic characteristics and clinical correlates. Diagn Cytopathol, 28, 308-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.10286
- Louro AP, Roberson J, Eltoum I, Chhieng DC (2003). Atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. A follow-up study of conventional and liquid-based preparations in a high-risk population. Am J Clin Pathol, 120, 392-7. https://doi.org/10.1309/NPU3WRQCTAB81XLW
- Louro AP, Roberson J, Eltoum I, Chhieng DC (2013). Atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Am J Clin Pathol, 120, 392-97.
- Okayama K, Okodo M, Kumagai T, et al (2010a). Improvement in situ PCR -Detection of single-copy HPV-DNA. J Jpn Soc Clin Cytol, 49, 393-9. https://doi.org/10.5795/jjscc.49.393
- Okayama K, Okodo M, Fujii M, et al (2010b). New cell findings on low-grade squamous intra epithelial lesions (LSIL)-minimizing the atypical squamous sells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) diagnosis rate. J Jpn Soc Clin Cytol, 49, 321-9. https://doi.org/10.5795/jjscc.49.321
- Okayama K, Okodo M, Kumagai T, et al (2012). Improved accuracy of cytodiagnosis using the Kato self-collection devise: the usefulness of smear preparation in liquid-based cytology methods. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 4521-24. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.9.4521
- Okayama K, Okodo M, Kumagai T, et al (2013). Re-examination of the cell findings of HPV infection-The presence or absence of HPV-DNA. J Jpn Soc Clin Cytol, 52, 224-30. https://doi.org/10.5795/jjscc.52.224
- Quddus MR, Sung CJ, Steinhoff MM, et al (2001). Atypical squamous metaplastic cells. Cancer Cytopathol, 93, 16-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(20010225)93:1<16::AID-CNCR9002>3.0.CO;2-A
- Schoolland M, Sterrett GF, Knowles SA, et al (1998). The "Inconclusive-possible high grade epithelial abnormality" category in Papanicolaou smear reporting. Cancer, 84, 208-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980825)84:4<208::AID-CNCR5>3.0.CO;2-I
- Selvaggi SM (2003). Reporting of atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H) on cervical samples: is it significant? Diagn Cytopathol, 29, 38-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.10303
- Sheils LA, Wilbur DC (1997). Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Stratification of the risk of association with, or progression to, squamous intraepithelial lesions based on morphologic subcategorization. Acta Cytol, 41, 1065-72. https://doi.org/10.1159/000332789
- Sherman ME, Solomon D, Schiffman M (2001). ASCUS LSIL triage study group. qualification of ASCUS. a comparison of equivocal LSIL and equivocal HSIL cervical cytology in the ASCUS LSIL Triage Study. Am J Clin Pathol, 116, 386-94. https://doi.org/10.1309/JM3V-U4HP-W8HJ-68XV
- Sherman ME, Castle PE, Solomon D (2006). Cervical cytology of atypical squamous cells-cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H). Cancer cytopathol, 108, 298-305. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21844
- Simsir A, Ioffe O, Sun P, et al (2006). Effect of Bethesda 2001 on reporting of atypical squamous cells (ASC) with special emphasis on atypical squamous cells-cannot rule out high grade (ASC-H). Diagn Cytopathol, 34, 62-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.20334
- Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, et al (2002). The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA, 287, 2114-9. ---- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.16.2114