DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Growth Comparison of Israeli Carp (Cyprinus carpio) to Different Breeding Combination

  • Hwang, Ju-ae (Inland Aquaculture Research Center, National Institute of Fisheries Science (NIFS)) ;
  • Goo, In Bon (Inland Aquaculture Research Center, National Institute of Fisheries Science (NIFS)) ;
  • Kim, Jung Eun (Inland Aquaculture Research Center, National Institute of Fisheries Science (NIFS)) ;
  • Kim, Myung Hun (Inland Aquaculture Research Center, National Institute of Fisheries Science (NIFS)) ;
  • Kim, Do Hee (Inland Aquaculture Research Center, National Institute of Fisheries Science (NIFS)) ;
  • Im, Jae Hyun (Inland Aquaculture Research Center, National Institute of Fisheries Science (NIFS)) ;
  • Choi, Hye-Sung (Inland Aquaculture Research Center, National Institute of Fisheries Science (NIFS)) ;
  • Lee, Jeong-Ho (Inland Aquaculture Research Center, National Institute of Fisheries Science (NIFS))
  • Received : 2016.10.15
  • Accepted : 2016.12.05
  • Published : 2016.12.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the improvement of growth in Israeli carp (Cyprinus carpio), and the cross experiment was carried out with two strains of Israeli carp. Four combinations of Israeli carp from Jeonbuk fisheries farm and Songpu mirror carp from Heilong Jiang, China (KK; Jeonbuk ♀ ${\times}$ Jeonbuk ♂, KC; Jeonbuk ♀ ${\times}$ China ♂, CC; China ♀ ${\times}$ China ♂ and CK; China ♀ ${\times}$ Jeonbuk ♂) were developed and reared. Body length, body weight and condition factor were determined at 20, 40, 60 and 170 days post-hatch (DPH). The results showed that there were differences in growth rate of the four groups. Body length of four groups were CK > CC > KC > KK and body weight were CC > CK > KC > KK at 170 DPH. The growth perfomance of four groups were statistically significant difference (P<0.05). During the rearing, CC group had longer length and higher weight at 170 DPH compared to other three groups and also condition factor was highest in the CC group, but there was no significant difference in a survival rate. These results indicated that the growth performance mainly depended upon brooder combination but survival rate could not significantly affect brooder.

Keywords

References

  1. Bakos J (1995) Genetic improvement of common carp strains using intraspecific hybridization. Aquaculture 129:183-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(94)00245-J
  2. Chatterji A, Siddiqui AQ, Khan AA (1977) Length-weight relationship of a carp, Labeo bata (Ham). Indian Acad Sci 86:189-194.
  3. Dong Z, Nguyen H, Zhu W (2015) Genetic evaluation of a selective breeding program for common carp Cyprinus carpio conducted from 2004 to 2014. BMC Genetics 16:1-9.
  4. Duncan DB (1995) Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11:1-42.
  5. FAO Fisheries Department (2007) Fisheries Statistics. FAO-Rome. http://www.fao. org/ figis/servlet.
  6. Hamzah A, Ponzoni RW, Nguyen NH, Khaw HL, Yee HY, Nor SAM (2014) Genetic evaluation of the Genetically Improved Farmed Tilapia (GIFT) strain over ten generations of selection in Malaysia. Pertanika J Trop Agric Sci 37(4):411-29.
  7. Heath DD, Fox CW, Heath JW (1999) Maternal effects on offspring size: Variation through early development of Chinook salmon. Evolution 53:1605-1611. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05424.x
  8. Jo JY, Hue CH, Park JH, Yoon GH, Kim YH, Oh SY, Bai SC (1998) Effects of fish meal analogue on the growth of Israeli strain of Common carp, Cyprinus carpio. J Aquacult 11: 487-493.
  9. Jhingran VG (1952) General length-width relationship of three major carps of India. Proc Nat Inst Sci 18:449-460.
  10. Jhingran VG, Pullin RSV (1985) A hatchery manual for the common, Chinese and Indian major carps. ICLARM stud Rev 11:191.
  11. Khater AM (2002) Effect of sex ratio on reproductive performance of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and blue tilapia (Oreochromis aureus). Egypt J Agric Res 80:377-386.
  12. Li CZ, Y JZ, Hu X, Shi L (2009) Comparative studies on measurable characters and the number of scales in Sonpu mirror carp and German mirror carp selection strain. Chi J Fish 22:53-61.
  13. Naeem MA, Khan MN (1992) Morphometric studies of an exotic fish Orechromis nilotica in relation to body size. Proc Pak Cong Zool 12:599-605.
  14. Naeem MA, Bhatti MN (2000) Morphometric studies of cold water fish rainbow trout and Oncorhynchus mykiss in relation to body size. Pak J Zool 1: 55-62.
  15. Naeem M, Salam A (2004) Morphometric studies of Orechromis nilotica (male) in relation to body size from Islamabad. Pak J Zool 19:73-81.
  16. Salam AM, Naeem ZB (1993) Length-weight and condition factor relationship of fresh water Chinese carp, from fish hatchery Islamabad. Pak J Res 5:45-48.
  17. Wohlfarth GW, Moav R, Hulata G (1983) A genotype-environment interation for growth rate in the commn carp, growing in intensively manured ponds. Aquaculture 33:187-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(83)90399-X
  18. Wohlfarth GW, Feneis B, Von LM, Hulata G (1984) Application of selective breeding of the common carp to European aquaculture. Eur Maricult Soc 8:177-193.
  19. Wang Y, Xu Z (2006) Effect probiotic for common carp (Cyprinus carpio) based on growth performance and digestive enzyme activities. Animal Feed Sci & Tch 127:283-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.09.003
  20. Wootton RJ (1990) Ecology of Teleost Fishes. Chapman and Hall, London.
  21. Weatherly AH (1972) Growth and Ecology of Fish Population. Academic Press, London.
  22. Wang CA, Xu QY, Zhao ZG, Li JN, Wang LS, Luo L (2014) Effects of dietary protein and temperature on growth and flesh quality of Songpu Mirror carp. Jounal of North 21:53-61.