Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Narrative Inquiry on Effects of Portfolio Application on Pre-service Science Teachers' Reflective Thinking

포트폴리오 활용이 예비 과학교사의 반성적 사고에 미치는 영향에 관한 내러티브 탐구

  • Received : 2016.01.25
  • Accepted : 2016.03.15
  • Published : 2016.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effects of portfolio application on pre-service science teachers' reflective thinking. For the purpose, we used narrative inquiry on pre-service science teachers' portfolios. We also analyzed the dimensions and levels of pre-service science teachers' reflective thinking. Analysis results showed that the pre-service science teachers' reflective thinking was mostly centered on focus at the beginning of semester. In addition, they exhibited routine and technical levels of reflective thinking. Analysis of pre-service science teachers' reflective thinking showed it as gradually extending to the dimension of inquiry and dimension of change by the end of semester. Here, the level of reflective thinking was higher at the dialogic level and transformative level. Pre-service science teachers showed that they had difficulties in making portfolios. However, they answered positively about application of portfolios. The results of this study suggest that there is a need to actively introduce portfolio assessment in teacher education courses in order to increase the reflective thinking of pre-service science teachers.

이 연구는 포트폴리오 평가가 예비 과학교사의 반성적 사고에 영향을 미치는지 알아보기 위한 것이다. 이를 위해 예비 과학교사들의 포트폴리오에 나타난 내러티브 탐구를 활용하였다. 또한 내러티브에 나타난 예비 과학교사들의 반성적 사고 차원과 수준을 분석하였다. 분석 결과 학기 초에 예비 과학교사들의 반성적 사고는 대부분 초점 차원인 것으로 나타났다. 또한 반성적 사고의 수준은 즉각적이고 기술적이었다. 학기 말에 실시된 분석 결과에서는 예비 과학교사들의 반성적 사고가 질문 차원과 변화 차원으로 점차 확대되었다. 대부분 대해 이 연구의 결과는 예비 과학교사들의 반성적 사고를 높이기 위해 교사교육과정에 포트폴리오 평가를 적극적으로 도입할 필요가 있음을 시사하고 있다. 반성적 사고의 수준은 대화적이고 변혁적인 수준으로 높아졌다. 예비 과학교사들은 포트폴리오를 작성하는 데 어려움을 겪은 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 그들은 포트폴리오 활용에 대해 긍정적으로 인식하는 것으로 응답하였다. 이 연구의 결과는 예비 과학교사들의 반성적 사고를 높이기 위해 교사교육과정에서 포트폴리오 평가를 적극적으로 도입하는 것이 필요하다는 점을 시사하고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, J. K. (2006). The effects of using portfolio assessment in preservice teacher education for early childhood mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs and perception of the portfolio assessment. Journal of Early Childhood Education, 26(5), 173-190.
  2. Carroll, J. A., Potthoff, D., & Huber, T. (1996). Learning from three years of portfolio use in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 47(4), 253-262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487196474003
  3. Carter, K. (1993). The place of story in the study of teaching and teacher education. Educational Researcher, 22(1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X022001005
  4. Cho, H. M. (2001). Portfolio assessment for performance evaluation. Seoul: Kyoyookbook.
  5. Chung, C. D., & Kang, K.H. (2012). A Narrative Inquiry into Pre-Service Science Teachers' Reflective Thinking as Presented in Microteaching Lessons. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 32(9), 1405-1416.
  6. Clandinin, D. J., & Murphy, M. S. (2009). Comments on Coulter and Smith: Relational Ontological Commitments in Narrative Research. Educational Researcher, 38(8), 598-602. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09353940
  7. Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (2006). Narrative inquiry. In Green, J., Camilli, G., & Elmore, P. (Eds.). Handbook of complementary methods in education research(pp. 375-385). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Irlbaum.
  8. Feiman, S. (1980). Growth and reflection as aims in teacher education. In G. Hall, S. Hord, & G. Brown (Eds.). Exploring issues in teacher education: Questions for future research. Austin, TX: The University of Texas Research and Development Center for Teacher Education.
  9. Hatton, N., & Smith, D.(1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(94)00012-U
  10. Hur, C. (2007). Practicum as a place for reconstracing pedagogical knowledge: Experiences of five students-teachers. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25(1), 95-127. https://doi.org/10.15708/kscs.25.1.200703.005
  11. Kim, C. J. (2000). The effects of a portfolio system on pre-service elementary school teachers' science teaching self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 20(1), 183-192.
  12. Kim, M., & Kim, B. (2002). Narrative thought and ITS implication on the science education. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 22(4), 851-861.
  13. Kim, H. P., Kim, Y. Y., & Kim, H. S. (2008). The effects of a program applied with learning portfolio style to enhance the capability of reflective thinking of pre-service teachers. Journal of Korean Association of Practical Arts Education, 21(3), 257-276.
  14. Kortahgen, F., & Vasalos, A. (2005). Levels in reflection: Core reflection as a means to enhance professional growth. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11(1), 47-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354060042000337093
  15. Krause, S. (1996). Portfolio in teacher education: Effects of instruction on preservice teachers' early comprehension of the portfolio process. Journal of Yeacher Education, 47(2), 130-138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487196047002006
  16. Lee, B. (2013). Using portfolio for professional development of pre-service mathematics teachers. Mathematical Education, 52(2), 175-190. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2013.52.2.175
  17. Loughran, J., & Corrigan, D. (1995). Teaching portfolios: A strategy for developing learning and teaching in preservice education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(6), 565-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(95)00012-9
  18. Oh, P. S., Lee, S. K., Lee, G., Kim, C. J., & Kim, H. B. (2008). Narrative inquiry on student-teachers' teaching experiences with extra curricular science classes of a high school: Types and characteristics of the knowledge constructed by the pre-service science teachers. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 28(6), 546-564.
  19. Park, S. H., & Bae, S. H. (2008). A case study about the learning competency for students through learning portfolio. Journal of Learning-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 8(2), 159-179.
  20. Richert, A. E. (1990). Teaching teachers to reflect: A consideration of programme structure. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(6), 509-527. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027900220601
  21. Schoyn, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
  22. Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  23. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Education Review, 57, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  24. Song, Y. S. (2004). A study on portfolio teaching application and recognition to preservice early chilehood teacher;s science teaching attitude promotion. The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 9(4), 155-174.
  25. Stone, B. A. (1998). Problems, pitfalls, and benefits of portfolios. Teacher Education Quarterly, 25(1), 105-114.
  26. Takona, J. P. & Wilburn, R. J. (2004). Primer to developing a successful pre-service teacher portfolio. New York: Oxford University Press.
  27. Valli, L. (1993). Reflective teacher education: cases and critiques. State University of New York Press.
  28. Ward, J. R., & McCotter. S. S. (2004). Reflection as a visible outcome for preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 243-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.02.004
  29. Yoo, S. Y. (2000). Using portfolios as toos to implement preservice teachers' professional development and reflective thinking in early science education. Journal of Early Childhood Education, 20(1), 163-184.
  30. Zeichner, K. M. (1983). Alternative Paradigms of Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 34(3), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718303400302
  31. Zeichner, K. M., & Liston, D. (1987). Teaching student teachers to reflect. Harvard educational Review, 5, 23-48.

Cited by

  1. 예비과학교사의 교육실습에 대한 내러티브 탐구를 통한 순환적 반성의 특징 탐색 vol.45, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2017.45.4.587
  2. 중등예비수학교사의 학습보조교사 활동을 통한 반성과 변화 vol.32, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2018.32.1.59