성인간호학회지 (Korean Journal of Adult Nursing)

  • 제28권2호
  • /
  • Pages.191-201
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1225-4886(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-338X(eISSN)
한국성인간호학회 (Korean Society of Adult Nursing)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국어판 '암 환자가 인식하는 간호의 질 측정도구'의 타당도와 신뢰도

Validity and Reliability Test of the Korean Version of the Oncology Patients' Perception of the Quality of Nursing Care Scale

  • 강지영 (서울대학교 간호대학) ;
  • 강혜영 (서울대학교병원 간호본부) ;
  • 김나년 (서울대학교병원 간호본부) ;
  • 이미정 (서울대학교병원 간호본부) ;
  • 김유진 (서울대학교병원 간호본부) ;
  • 김주현 (서울대학교병원 간호본부) ;
  • 여수정 (서울대학교병원 간호본부) ;
  • 서윤예 (건강보험심사평가원 평가부) ;
  • 서은영 (서울대학교 간호대학.간호과학연구소)
  • Kang, Jiyoung (College of Nursing, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kang, Heiyoung (Department of Nursing, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Nanyeon (Department of Nursing, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Mijung (Department of Nursing, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Youjine (Department of Nursing, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Juhyeon (Department of Nursing, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Yeo, Sujeong (Department of Nursing, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Seo, Yunye (Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service) ;
  • Suh, Eunyoung (College of Nursing.Research Institute of Nursing Science, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2016.02.06
  • 심사 : 2016.04.19
  • 발행 : 2016.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this methodological study was to examine the validity and reliability of a translated Korean version of The Oncology Patients' Perception of the Quality of Nursing Care Scale. Methods: The translated scale was pilot tested and then administered to 360 patients with cancer. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were utilized to assess the factor structure. Internal consistency reliability was determined using coefficient ${\alpha}$. Results: Two of the 40 items were deleted with a principal component method of exploratory factor analysis because they did not meet the factor-loading criterion. The 38 items were again analyzed and, four factors were validated (KMO=.96, Bartlett ${\chi}^2=10809.81$, df=780, p<.001). The four factors accounted for 60.9% of the variance. Factor loadings of the scale on the four subscales ranged from .65 to .91. The scale showed reliable internal consistency with a Cronbach's ${\alpha}$, total 38 items (${\alpha}=.96$) in four subscales: individualization (18 items, ${\alpha}=.96$), proficiency (10, .91), responsiveness (7, .90), and coordination (3, .80). Conclusion: The findings of this study demonstrate that the scale has satisfactory construct validity and reliability to measure quality of cancer nursing care from the patient's perspective in Korea.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2001.
  2. Epstein RM, Street RL Jr. Patient-centered communication in cancer care: promoting healing and reducing suffering. NIH Publication: National Cancer Institute; 2007. Report No.: 07-6225.
  3. Suhonen R, Schmidt LA, Radwin L. Measuring individualized nursing care: assessment of reliability and validity of three scales. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2007;59(1):77-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04282.x
  4. Radwin LE, Farquhar SL, Knowles MN, Virchick BG. Cancer patients' descriptions of their nursing care. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2005;50(2):162-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03375.x
  5. Lee MA, Yom Y-H. A comparative study of patients' and nurses' perceptions of the quality of nursing services, satisfaction and intent to revisit the hospital: a questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2007;44(4):545-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.03.006
  6. Radwin L, Alster K, Rubin KM. Development and testing of the oncology patients' perceptions of the quality of nursing care scale. Oncology Nursing Forum. 2003;30(2):283-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1188/03.onf.283-290
  7. Kitson A, Marshall A, Bassett K, Zeitz K. What are the core elements of patient centred care? a narrative review and synthesis of the literature from health policy, medicine and nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2013;69(1):4-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06064.x
  8. Izumi S, Baggs JG, Knafl KA. Quality nursing care for hospitalized patients with advanced illness: concept development. Research in Nursing & Health. 2010;33(4):299-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nur.20391
  9. Larson PJ, Ferketich SL. Patients' satisfaction with nurses' caring during hospitalization. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 1993;15(6):690-703. https://doi.org/10.1177/019394599301500603
  10. Mitchell PH, Heinrich J, Moritz P, Hinshaw AS. Measurement into practice: summary and recommendations. Medical Care. 1997;35(11):NS124-7.
  11. Koberich S, Farin E. A systematic review of instruments measuring patients' perceptions of patient centred nursing care. Nursing Inquiry. 2015;22(2):106-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nin.12078
  12. Sidani S, Collins L, Harbman P, MacMillan K, Reeves S, Hurlock Chorostecki C, et al. Development of a measure to assess healthcare providers' implementation of patient centered care. Worldviews on Evidence Based Nursing. 2014;11(4):248-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12047
  13. Radwin L. Oncology patients' perceptions of quality nursing care. Research in Nursing & Health. 2000;23(3):179-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200006)23:3<179::AID-NUR2>3.0.CO;2-T
  14. Radwin LE, Cabral HJ, Wilkes G. Relationships between patient centered cancer nursing interventions and desired health outcomes in the context of the health care system. Research in Nursing & Health. 2009;32(1):4-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nur.20302
  15. National Cancer Center. 2013 Cancer registry statistics in Korea. Seoul; Ministry of Health & Welfare, Korea Central Cancer Registry, National Cancer Center; 2015.
  16. DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc; 2003.
  17. Comrey AL. Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1988;56(5):754-61. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.56.5.754
  18. Kim GS. Structural equation modeling analysis: Amos 18.0. Seoul: Hannarae Publishing Co; 2010.
  19. Schmitt TA. Current methodological considerations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 2011;29(4):304-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911406653
  20. Brislin RW. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 1970;1(3):185-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
  21. Duffy ME. Translating instruments into other languages: basic considerations. Clinical Nurse Specialist. 2006;20(5):225-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002800-200609000-00006
  22. Lee E, Lim N, Park H, Lee I, Kim J, Bae J, et al. Nursing research and statistical analysis. Paju: Soomoomsa Publishing; 2009.
  23. Yu J-P. The concept and understanding of structural equation modeling. Seoul: Hannarae Publishing Co; 2012.
  24. Kang H. A guide on the use of factor analysis in the assessment of construct validity. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2013;43(5):587-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.5.587
  25. Tak J. Psychological testing: an understanding of development and evaluation method. 2nd ed. Seoul: Hakjisa; 2007.
  26. Kang J, Suh EE. Perceptions of quality of patient-centered nursing care among women with breast cancer. Perspectives in Nursing Science. 2015;12(2):115-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.16952/pns.2015.12.2.115
  27. Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika. 1974;39(1):31-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
  28. Bagozzi RP, Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 1988;16(1):74-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
  29. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research. 1981;18(1):39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  30. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
  31. Larrabee J, Bolden L. Defining patient-perceived quality of nursing care. Journal of Nursing Care Quality. 2001;16(1):34-60. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001786-200110000-00005
  32. Sofaer S, Firminger K. Patient perceptions of the quality of health services. Annual Reviews of Public Health. 2005;26:513-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.25.050503.153958
  33. Williams SA. Quality and care: patients' perceptions. Journal of Nursing Care Quality. 1998;12(6):18-25. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001786-199808000-00006
  34. Lee T, Kang KH, Ko YK, Cho S-H, & Kim EY. Issues and challenges of nurse workforce policy: a critical review and implication. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 2014;20(1):106-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2014.20.1.106

피인용 문헌

  1. Analysis of a Survey on Public Perceptions and Preferences of the “Smart Green Office” to Help Encourage Creation of the Program vol.27, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.11623/frj.2019.27.1.09
  2. The Quality of Patient-centered Nursing Care Perceived by Cancer Patients Who Have Had an Operation vol.21, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5388/aon.2021.21.2.65