The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of different grinding burs on the physical properties of zirconia

  • Lee, Kyung-Rok (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Choe, Han-Cheol (Department of Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Heo, Yu-Ri (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Lee, Jang-Jae (Department of Computer Science and Statistics, College of Natural Sciences, Chosun University) ;
  • Son, Mee-Kyoung (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • Received : 2015.08.23
  • Accepted : 2016.01.12
  • Published : 2016.04.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. Grinding with less stress on 3Y-TZP through proper selection of methods and instruments can lead to a long-term success of prosthesis. The purpose of this study was to compare the phase transformation and physical properties after zirconia surface grinding with 3 different grinding burs. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Forty disc-shaped zirconia specimens were fabricated. Each Ten specimens were ground with AllCeramic SuperMax (NTI, Kahla, Germany), Dura-Green DIA (Shofu Inc., Kyoto, Japan), and Dura-Green (Shofu Inc., Kyoto, Japan). Ten specimens were not ground and used as a control group. After the specimen grinding, XRD analysis, surface roughness test, FE-SEM imaging, and biaxial flexural strength test were performed. RESULTS. After surface grinding, small amount of monoclinic phase in all experimental groups was observed. The phase change was higher in specimens, which were ground with Dura-Green DIA and AllCeramic SuperMax burs. The roughness of surfaces increased in specimens, which were ground with Dura-Green DIA and AllCeramic SuperMax burs than control groups and ground with Dura-Green. All experimental groups showed lower flexural strength than control group, but there was no statistically significant difference between control group and ground with Dura-Green DIA and AllCeramic SuperMax burs. The specimens, which were ground with Dura-Green showed the lowest strength. CONCLUSION. The use of dedicated zirconia-specific grinding burs such as Dura-Green DIA and AllCeramic SuperMax burs decreases the grinding time and did not significantly affect the flexural strength of zirconia, and therefore, they may be recommended. However, a fine polishing process should be accompanied to reduce the surface roughness after grinding.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim DJ. Transformation of tetragonal zirconia. Sci Technol Ceram Mater 1993;8:157-65.
  2. Iseri U, Ozkurt Z, Yalniz A, Kazazoglu E. Comparison of different grinding procedures on the flexural strength of zirconia. J Prosthet Dent 2012;107:309-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60081-X
  3. Garvie RC, Hannink RH, Pascoe RT. Ceramic steel? Nature 1975;258:703-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/258703a0
  4. Sakuma T, Yoshizawa YI, Suto H. The rhombohedral phase produced in partially-stabilized zirconia. J Mater Sci Lett 1985;4:29-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00719887
  5. Karakoca S, Yilmaz H. Influence of surface treatments on surface roughness, phase transformation, and biaxial flexural strength of Y-TZP ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009;91:930-7.
  6. Denry IL, Holloway JA. Microstructural and crystallographic surface changes after grinding zirconia-based dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006;76:440-8.
  7. Kosmac T, Oblak C, Jevnikar P, Funduk N, Marion L. The effect of surface grinding and sandblasting on flexural strength and reliability of Y-TZP zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 1999;15:426-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00070-6
  8. Kosmac T, Oblak C, Jevnikar P, Funduk N, Marion L. Strength and reliability of surface treated Y-TZP dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;53:304-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4636(2000)53:4<304::AID-JBM4>3.0.CO;2-S
  9. Gupta TK. Strengthening by surface damage in metastable tetragonal zirconia. J Am Ceram Soc 1980;63:117.
  10. Yamaguchi H, Ino S, Hamano N, Okada S, Teranaka T. Examination of bond strength and mechanical properties of Y-TZP zirconia ceramics with different surface modifications. Dent Mater J 2012;31:472-80. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2011-237
  11. Guess PC, Zhang Y, Kim JW, Rekow ED, Thompson VP. Damage and reliability of Y-TZP after cementation surface treatment. J Dent Res 2010;89:592-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510363253
  12. Subasi MG, Demir N, K ara O, Ozturk AN, Ozel F. Mechanical properties of zirconia after different surface treatments and repeated firings. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6: 462-7. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.6.462
  13. Iseri U, Ozkurt Z, Kazazoglu E, Kucukoglu D. Influence of grinding procedures on the flexural strength of zirconia ceramics. Braz Dent J 2010;21:528-32. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402010000600008
  14. Garvie RC, Nicholson PS. Phase analysis in zirconia systems. J Am Ceram Soc 1972;55:303-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1972.tb11290.x
  15. Kosmac T, Wagner R, Claussen N. X-Ray determination of transformation depths in ceramics containing tetragonal $ZrO_2$. J Am Ceram Soc 1981;64:c72-3
  16. International Organization for Standardization ISO 6872: 1995(E). Dental Ceramics, 2nd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO;1995.
  17. Kao HC, Ho FY, Yang CC, Wei WJ. Surface machining of fine-grain Y-TZP. J Eur Ceram Soc 2000;20:2447-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-2219(00)00114-X
  18. Kou W, Molin M, Sjogren G. Surface roughness of five different dental ceramic core materials after grinding and polishing. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:117-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01546.x
  19. Kim HT, Han JS, Yang JH, Lee JB, Kim SH. The effect of low temperature aging on the mechanical property & phase stability of Y-TZP ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont 2009;1:113-7. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2009.1.3.113
  20. Swain MV, Hannink RHJ. Metastability of the martensitic transformation in a 12 mol% ceria-zirconia alloy: II, grinding studies. J Am Ceram Soc 1989;72:1358-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb07652.x
  21. Gross V, Swain MV. Mechanical properties and microstructure of sintered and hot isostatically pressed yttria partially stabilized zirconia(Y-PSZ). J Aust Ceram Soc 1986;22:1-12.
  22. Urabe K, Nakajima A. Characteristic microstructure of $CeO_2$-$Y_2O_3$ doped tetragonal zirconia polycrystals. Adv Ceram 1988;24:345-55.
  23. Albakry M, Guazzato M, Swain MV. Biaxial flexural strength, elastic moduli, and x-ray diffraction characterization of three pressable all-ceramic materials. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:374-80. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.42
  24. Oh GJ, Yun KD, Lee KM, Lim HP, Park SW. Sintering behavior and mechanical properties of zirconia compacts fabricated by uniaxial press forming. J Adv Prosthodont 2010;2: 81-7. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2010.2.3.81

Cited by

  1. The effect of various polishing systems on surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia vol.10, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.2.132
  2. Surface Characterization of Monolithic Zirconia Following Treatment with Different Polishing Techniques vol.980, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.980.176
  3. Effect of different grinding protocols on surface characteristics and fatigue behavior of yttria-stabilized zirconia polycrystalline: An in vitro study vol.124, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.016
  4. Comparison of surface topography and roughness in different yttrium oxide compositions of dental zirconia after grinding and polishing vol.13, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2021.13.4.258