Acknowledgement
Supported by : Afyon Kocatepe University
References
- Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. 2nd ed, Mosby, St. Louis; Missouri; 1999. p. 3-12.
- Sheets JL, Wilcox C, Wilwerding T. Cement selection for cement-retained crown technique with dental implants. J Prosthodont 2008;17:92-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00262.x
- Bulaqi HA, Mousavi Mashhadi M, Safari H, Samandari MM, Geramipanah F. Effect of increased crown height on stress distribution in short dental implant components and their surrounding bone: A finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:548-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.11.007
- Worni A, Gholami H, Marchand L, Katsoulis J, Mericske-Stern R, Enkling N. Retrievability of implant-supported crowns when using three different cements: a controlled clinical trial. Int J Prosthodont 2015;28:22-9. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4119
- Assenza B, Scarano A, Leghissa G, Carusi G, Thams U, Roman FS, Piattelli A. Screw- vs cement-implant-retained restorations: an experimental study in the Beagle. Part 1. Screw and abutment loosening. J Oral Implantol 2005;31: 242-6. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2005)31[242:SVCRAE]2.0.CO;2
- Mehl C, Harder S, Wolfart M, Kern M, Wolfart S. Retrievability of implant-retained crowns following cementation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:1304-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01587.x
- Vohra F, Habib R. Knowledge and attitude of dentists toward implant retained restorations in Saudi Arabia. Niger J Clin Pract 2015;18:312-7. https://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.151788
- Chaar MS, Att W, Strub JR. Prosthetic outcome of cementretained implant-supported fixed dental restorations: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:697-711. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02209.x
- Heinemann F, Mundt T, Biffar R. Retrospective evaluation of temporary cemented, tooth and implant supported fixed partial dentures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2006;34:86-90.
- Kayabasi O, Yuzbasioglu E, Erzincanli F. Static, dynamic and fatigue behaviors of dental implant using finite element method. Adv Eng Softw 2006;37:649-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2006.02.004
- Culhaoglu AK, Ozkir SE, Celik G, Terzioglu H. Comparison of two different restoration materials and two different implant designs of implant-supported fixed cantilevered prostheses: A 3D finite element analysis. Eur J Gen Dent 2013;2: 144-50. https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-9626.112315
- Kokubo Y, Kano T, Tsumita M, Sakurai S, Itayama A, Fukushima S. Retention of zirconia copings on zirconia implant abutments cemented with provisional luting agents. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:48-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02013.x
- Curtis DA, Plesh O, Sharma A, Finzen F. Complications associated with fixed partial dentures with a loose retainer. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:245-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.08.014
- Hill EE, Lott J. A clinically focused discussion of luting materials. Aust Dent J 2011;56:67-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01297.x
- Michalakis K, Pissiotis AL, Kang K, Hirayama H, Garefis PD, Petridis H. The effect of thermal cycling and air abrasion on cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:569-74.
- Farzin M, Torabi K, Ahangari AH, Derafshi R. Effect of abutment modification and cement type on retention of cement-retained implant supported crowns. J Dent (Tehran) 2014;11:256-62.
- Ozkir SE, Terzioglu H. Macro design effects on stress distribution around implants: a photoelastic stress analysis. Indian J Dent Res 2012;23:603-7. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.107346
- Martini AP, Barros RM, Junior AC, Rocha EP, de Almeida EO, Ferraz CC, Pellegrin MC, Anchieta RB. Influence of platform and abutment angulation on peri-implant bone. A three-dimensional finite element stress analysis. J Oral Implantol 2013;39:663-9. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00029
- Pan YH, Ramp LC, Lin CK, Liu PR. Comparison of 7 luting protocols and their effect on the retention and marginal leakage of a cement-retained dental implant restoration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:587-92.
- Mansour A, Ercoli C, Graser G, Tallents R, Moss M. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:343-8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130401.x
- Achour T, Merdji A, Bachir Bouiadjra B, Serier B, Djebbar N. Stress distribution in dental implant with elastomeric stress barrier. Mater Des 2011;32:282-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.05.053
- Wolff J, Narra N, Antalainen AK, Valasek J, Kaiser J, Sandor GK, Marcian P. Finite element analysis of bone loss around failing implants. Mater Des 2014;61:177-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.04.080
- Gore E, Evlioglu G. Assessment of the effect of two occlusal concepts for implant-supported fixed prostheses by finite element analysis in patients with bruxism. J Oral Implantol 2014;40:68-75. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00044
- Akca K, Iplikcioglu H. Evaluation of the effect of the residual bone angulation on implant-supported fixed prosthesis in mandibular posterior edentulism. Part II: 3-D finite element stress analysis. Implant Dent 2001;10:238-45. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200110000-00006
- Gomes EA, Assuncao WG, Barao VA, Delben JA, Rocha EP, de Sousa EA. Passivity versus unilateral angular misfit: evaluation of stress distribution on implant-supported single crowns: three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21:1683-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181f3c64b
- Frost HM. A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff's Law for clinicians. Angle Orthod 2004;74:3-15.
- de Moraes SL, Verri FR, Santiago JF Jr, Almeida DA, de Mello CC, Pellizzer EP. A 3-D finite element study of the influence of crown-implant ratio on stress distribution. Braz Dent J 2013;24:635-41. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201302287
- Elias CN, Oshida Y, Lima JH, Muller CA. Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability and morphology) of titanium and dental implant removal torque. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2008;1:234-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2007.12.002
Cited by
- Validation of a Simplified Implant-Retained Cantilever Fixed Prosthesis pp.1056-6163, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000699