응용통계연구 (The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics)

  • 제29권3호
  • /
  • Pages.409-424
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1225-066X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2383-5818(eISSN)
한국통계학회 (The Korean Statistical Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

구조방정식모형을 이용한 개인연금 가입의향의 결정요인 분석

An analysis of determinants of purchase intension of individual pension using structural equation model

  • 이찬희 (성균관대학교 경제대학/경영학부) ;
  • 정홍주 (성균관대학교 경제대학/경영학부)
  • Lee, Chanhee (College of Economics/School of Business, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Jung, Hongjoo (College of Economics/School of Business, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • 투고 : 2015.12.08
  • 심사 : 2016.03.07
  • 발행 : 2016.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 노후대비를 위한 재무수단 중에서 중요성이 커지고 있는 개인연금의 가입의향에 영향을 주는 심리요인과 금융요인 간의 인과관계를 종합적으로분석하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 전국 7대도시에 거주하는 928명의 일반인을 대상으로 실시한 설문자료를 토대로 구조방정식모형(SEM)을 이용하여 실증분석하였다. 구조방정식에 의한 실증분석결과, 개인연금 미가입자의 신규가입의향에 있어 장수에 대한 가능성과 대처효용성은 장수에 대한 정서인 두려움과 걱정을 완전매개로 하여 개인연금의 신규가입의향에 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 보험사 신뢰와 위험감수성향은 직접적으로 개인연금의 신규가입의향에 영향을 주며, 특히 개인연금 가입의향에 대하여 보험사 신뢰가 가장 중요한 요인임을 보여주었다. 또한 개인연금 기가입자의 추가가입의향에 있어서는 보험사 신뢰만이 개인연금 추가가입의향에 직접적으로 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구를 통하여 장수 관련 정서적 측면이 개인연금 미가입 고객을 대상으로 한 마케팅 활동에 도움이 될 것으로 기대된다. 아울러 보험사 신뢰가 미래의 개인연금 신규가입뿐만 아니라 추가가입의향에 가장 큰 영향을 미치므로 보험사의 신뢰도를 높이기 위한 노력이 긴요함을 시사한다.

This study analyzed the causal relationship among factors that influence the purchase intensions for individual pensions which have a growing importance as a financial means after retirement. For this purpose, structural equation modeling based on the survey data (N = 928) was conducted to analyze psychological factors and financial factors comprehensively. According to empirical results of the structural equation, in the case of non-subscribers of individual pensions, potential longevity and coping efficacy influenced the purchase intensions for individual pensions fully mediated by fear and worry about longevity. Trust in insurers and risk tolerance directly influenced the purchase intensions for individual pensions. These show that trust in insurers is the most important factor in purchase intensions for individual pensions. Also, only trust in insurers give a direct impact on individual pensions in the case of individual pension subscribers. Longevity-related emotional side is expected to help in marketing activities that target potential customers signing individual pensions. In addition, trust in insurers has the greatest impact on new and additional subscriptions that represent critical efforts to improve trust in insurers.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Baek, E. Y. (2011). Determinants of retirement preparation and the types of preparation of the baby boomers, Korean Social Security Studies, 27, 357-383.
  2. Baek, E. Y. (2012). An analysis of individual annuity purchasing intension, Korean Social Security Studies, 28, 64-83.
  3. Brown, J. R. (2001). Private pensions, mortality risk, and the decision to annuitilize, Journal of Public Economics, 82, 29-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00152-3
  4. Campbell, J., Jackson, E., Madrain, B., and Tufano, P. (2011). Consumer financial protection, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25, 94.
  5. Cappelletti, G., Guazzarotti, G., and Tommasino, P. (2011). What determines annuity demand at retirement?, (Working paper), Bank of Italy, #805, 1-38.
  6. Choi, H. and Lee, Y. (2005). Research on financial preparedness for retirement among economically active population aged 65 or older based on Socio-Psycho paradigm, Korean Journal of Social Welfare, 57, 415-435.
  7. Chun, H. (2013). Employees' satisfaction effect analysis using partial least square(PLS) structural equation model, Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 15, 747-756.
  8. Financial Supervisory Service (2010). College Students' Measurement Results of Financial Literacy in 2010.
  9. Financial Supervisory Service (2015). Plan of Private Pension Activation, Aug., 5, 2015 press release.
  10. Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., and Slovic, P. (2003). Judgement and decision making: The dance of affect and reason, In S. L., Schneider & J. Shanteau(Eds.), Emerging Perspectives on Judgement and Decision Research, Cambridge University Press.
  11. Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., and Combs, B. (1978). How safe is safe enough, Policy Science, 9, 127-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143739
  12. Grable, J. E. and Lytton, R. H. (2001). Assessing The concurrent validity of the SCF risk tolerance question, Financial Counselling and Planning, 12, 43-52.
  13. Hershey, D. A. and Mowen, J. C. (2000). Psychological determinants of financial preparedness for retirement, The Gerontologist, 40, 687-697. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/40.6.687
  14. Hong, S. (2000). The criteria for selecting appropriate fit indices in structual equation modeling and their rationales, Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19, 161-177.
  15. Hsee, C. K. and Kunreuther, H. C. (2000). The affection effect in insurance decisions, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 20, 141-159. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007876907268
  16. Inkamann, J., Lopes, P., and Michaellides, A. (2011). How deep is the annuity market participation puzzle?, The Review of Financial Studies, 24, 279-319. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhq080
  17. Jeon, S. H., Lim, B. I., and Kang, S. H. (2006). An analysis on both determinants of purchasing the private pension and changes in the status of subscribers, Insurance Development Studies, 17, 138-163.
  18. Jeon, Y. S., Byun, H. W., Chung, W. S., Park, S., Oh, S., Lee, S. W., and Choi, W. (2014). Insurance consumer questionnaire survey in 2014, Kiri Report.
  19. Jeong, W. and Kim, K. (2004). An analysis of the relationships among financial risk components, Korean Home Economics Association, 42, 5-9.
  20. Joo, S. H. (2011). Factors related to private pension product investment: including bequest motives, Journal of Consumer Studies, 22, 183-200.
  21. Jung, H. and Oh, T. H. (2005). An empirical study on the trust and determination factors of trust in the insurance industry, Korean Insurance Journal, 71, 49-73.
  22. Kim, H. and Kim, J. (2013). The effect of casting method and regulatory mode on annuity insurance purchasing intention, Journal of Consumer Studies, 24, 51-73.
  23. Kiri (2015). Insurance consumer questionnaire survey in 2015, Kiri Report.
  24. Lee, C. (2014). An empirical analysis of cognitive and social factors in purchasing financial means for retirement preparation, Ph.D Thesis of Sungkyunkwan University.
  25. Lee, C. and Jung, H. (2013). An analysis of determinants of purchase and preference of the individual pension: focusing on cognitive and emotional factors, financial literacy, trust and risk tolerance, Journal of Money & Finance, 27, 25-51.
  26. Lee, H. J. and Lee, Y. A. (2011). A cognitive-social model for risk perception of terrorism, Korean Journal of Culture and Social Issues, 17, 486-496.
  27. Lee, Y. A. and Lee, N. K. (2005). Psychological dimensions of risk perception, Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 16, 200.
  28. Lee, Y. H. and Lim, B. I. (2013). Studies on the role and development of private pension as the supplement scheme of national pension, Policy Report, National Pension Research Institute.
  29. Lusardi, A. and Mitchell, O. S. (2007). Baby Boomer retirement security: the role of planning, financial literacy, and housing wealth, Journal of Monetary Economics, 54, 205-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2006.12.001
  30. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., and Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
  31. Nam, S. and Cho, M. K. (2005). Measures to enhance the cocial reliability of life insurance industry, Life Insurance, 16-36.
  32. Nam, S. and Cho, Y. (2008). An empirical study on the policyholder's trust for the non-life insurance company, Korean Insurance Journal, 79, 195-220.
  33. Park, C. J. (2008). Types of financial preparation for aging by age, Korean Social Security Studies, 24, 139-166.
  34. Park, C. J. (2011). Factors affecting private financial preparation for aging of the baby boomers in Korea, Korean Social Security Studies, 27, 328-344.
  35. Park, C. W. and Lessing, V. P. (1981). Familiarity and its impact on consumer decision biases and heuristic, Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 223-230. https://doi.org/10.1086/208859
  36. Park, T. Y. (2010). A study on the effects of reliability of saving bank on transaction intention, Ph.D Thesis of Hoseo University.
  37. Siegrist, M., Cousin, M-E., Kastenholz, H., and Wiek, A. (2007). Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and foods packing: the influence of affect and trust, Appetite, 49, 459-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2007.03.002
  38. Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk, Science, 236, 280-285. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3563507
  39. Song, Y. A. (2009). Determinants of purchase of the private annuities and vitalization plan, Korea Insurance Research Institute KIRI Weekly.