Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture (한국유기농업학회지)

Korean Association of Organic Agriculture (한국유기농업학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Egg Quality in Battery Cage and Free-Range Systems : with Reference to Comparison of Eggs Based on Price and Hens' Age

방사 사육과 배터리 사육 산란계에서 난질 : 난가와 산란계 주령에 따른 난질의 비교

  • 김대우 (경상대학교 축산학과) ;
  • 강석민 (경상대학교 대학원 응용생명과학부(BK21 Plus Program)) ;
  • 양영록 (경상대학교 축산학과, 농업생명과학연구원) ;
  • 김지민 (경상대학교 축산학과, 농업생명과학연구원) ;
  • 윤형숙 (경상대학교 축산학과, 농업생명과학연구원) ;
  • 전중환 (농촌진흥청 축산과학원) ;
  • 최양호 (경상대학교 축산학과, 농업생명과학연구원)
  • Received : 2015.12.08
  • Accepted : 2015.12.24
  • Published : 2016.02.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The main purpose of the current study was to compare quality of eggs 1) produced from hens housed in battery cages vs. free range, 2) from young vs. old hens, and 3) tagged with the lowest vs. the highest price in a local franchised mart. The ages of hens, at which their eggs were used for the analysis of quality, were 70 weeks old in the experiment 1, 22 and 47 weeks old in the experiment 2, and were unknown in the experiment 3. Eggs were analyzed for weight, albumen height, Haugh unit, shell color, shell strength, shell thickness, shell weight, yolk color, yolk weight, and egg white weight. In the experiment 1, significant differences were detected between two housing systems in shell color, shell weight, yolk color, and yolk weight (P<0.05), but not in egg weight, albumen height, Haugh unit, shell strength, shell thickness, and egg white weight (P>0.05). Although egg weight was slightly but not significantly higher in battery cages by 2.2 g than in free range, yolk weight was significantly higher in battery cage (P<0.05). On the contrary, shell color was greatly increased in free range system by 68.5% compared with battery cage. In the experiment 2, there were significant differences between young and old hens in egg weight, albumen height, Haugh unit, shell strength, shell weight, yolk color and yolk weight (P<0.05). Egg weight, shell weight, yolk color and yolk weight were increased in old hens than young hens while albumen height, Haugh unit, and shell strength were decreased. In the experiment 3, egg weight, albumen height, Haugh unit, shell weight, and egg white weight were significantly higher in the highest priced eggs than the lowest ones (P<0.05), whereas shell strength and yolk color were lower (P<0.05) but shell color, shell thickness and yolk weight were not different (P>0.05). So, egg freshness was clearly higher in the highest priced ones than in the lowest (P<0.05). Due to the limited information on raising and husbandry of laying hens whose eggs were tested for egg quality in the current study, the present results should be cautiously interpreted while contributing to the future study as a basis in this field.

Keywords

References

  1. Albentosa, M. J. and J. J. Cooper. 2004. Effects of cage height and stocking density on the frequency of comfort behaviours performed by laying hens housed in furnished cages. Anim. Welfare 13(4): 419-424.
  2. Anderson, K. E., J. B. Tharrington, P. A. Curtis and F. T. Jones. 2004. Shell characteristics of eggs from historic strains of single comb white leghorn chickens and the relationship of egg shape to shell strength. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 3(1): 17-19. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2004.17.19
  3. Blokhuis, H. J., T. Fiks van Niekerk, W. Bessei, A. Elson, D. Guemene, J. B. Kjaerand and H. A. Van De Weerd. 2007. The LayWel project: welfare implications of changes in production systems for laying hens. World's Poult. Sci. J. 63(01): 101-114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933907001328
  4. Johnstona, S. A. and R. M. Gousa. 2007. Modelling the changes in the proportions of the egg components during a laying cycle. Br. Poult. Sci. 48(3): 347-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660701381134
  5. Kang, H.K., J. H. Cho, J. H. Kim, H. G. Kang, D. J. Yu, J. C. Na, D. W. Kim, S. J. Lee, I. S. Kim, and S. H. Kim. 2008. Effects of Restricted Feeding during Growing Period on Laying Performance and Egg Quality in Layers. Korean J. Poult. Sci. 35(1): 63-69. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2008.35.1.063
  6. Kim I. S. and E. J. Kim. 1999. A study on relationship between price premium and perceived quality. Rev. Bus. Econom. 12(6): 13-30. 12.
  7. Kim, K. S., S. K. Lee, Y. S. Choi, C. H. Ha and W. H. Kim. 2013. Effects of production performance, immunity and egg quality by raising on exercise yard in laying hens. Korean J. Poult. Sci. 40(2): 97-103. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2013.40.2.097
  8. Kwakkel, R. P., B. J. Ducro and W. J. Koops. 1993. Multiphasic analysis of growth of the body and its chemical components in White Leghorn pullets. Poult. Sci. 72(8): 1421-1432. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0721421
  9. Ledvinka, Z., E. Tumova, M. Englmaierova and M. Podsednicek. 2012. Egg quality of three laying hen genotypes kept in conventional cages and on litter. Archiv fur Geflugelkunde 76(1): 38-43.
  10. Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs. 2014. Vital Statistics in 2014 of Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs. http://www.mafra.go.kr/list.jsp?id=30155&pageNo=1&NOW_YEAR=2014&group_id=4&menu_id=72&link_menu_id=&division=B&board_kind=C&board_skin_id=C1&parent_code=71&link_url=&depth=2 (Released on September 12, 2014) (Access December 01, 2015).
  11. Pistekova, V., M. Hovorka, V. Vecerek, E. Strakova and P. Suchy. 2006. The quality comparison of eggs laid by laying hens kept in battery cages and in a deep litter system. Czech J. Anim. Sci. (7): 318-325.
  12. Pohle, K. and H. W. Cheng. 2009. Comparative effects of furnished and battery cages on egg production and physiological parameters in White Leghorn hens. Poult. Sci. 88(10): 2042-2051. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00171
  13. Silversides, F. G. and T. A. Scott. 2001. Effect of storage and layer age on quality of eggs from two lines of hens. Poult. Sci. 80(8): 1240-1245. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/80.8.1240
  14. Singh, R., K. M. Cheng, and F. G. Silversides. 2009. Production performance and egg quality of four strains of laying hens kept in conventional cages and floor pens. Poult. Sci. 88(2): 256-264. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00237
  15. Skrbic, Z., Z. Pavlovski, M. Lukic, D. Vitorovic, V. Petricevi and L. Stojanovic. 2011. Changes of egg quality properties with the age of layer hens in traditional and conventional production. Biotechnol. Anim. Husb. 27(3): 659-667. https://doi.org/10.2298/BAH1103659S
  16. Turkyilmaz, M. K. 2006. The effect of stocking density on stress reaction in broiler chickens during summer. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 32(1): 31-36.
  17. Van Den Brand, H., H. K. Parmentier and B. Kemp. 2004. Effects of housing system (outdoor vs cages) and age of laying hens on egg characteristics. Br. Poult. Sci. 45(6): 745-752. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660400014283
  18. Van Horne, P. L. M. 1996. Production and economic results of commercial flocks with white layers in aviary systems and battery cages. Br. Poult Sci. 37(2): 255-261. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669608417857
  19. Vits, A., D. Weitzenburger, H. Hamann, and O. Distl. 2005. Production, egg quality, bone strength, claw length, and keel bone deformities of laying hens housed in furnished cages with different group sizes. Poult. Sci. 84(10): 1511-1519. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.10.1511