Earthquakes and Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Upgrading equivalent static method of seismic designs to performance-based procedure

  • Received : 2014.10.05
  • Accepted : 2016.01.14
  • Published : 2016.04.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Beside the invaluable advancements in constructing more secure buildings, the post-earthquake inspections have reported considerable damages. In other words, the modern buildings satisfactorily decrease fatalities but the monetary impacts still mostly remain an unsolved concern of the stakeholders, the insurance companies and society together. Therefore, the fundamental target of the researches shifted from current force-based seismic design regulations to the Performance-Based earthquake engineering (PBEE). At the moment, some probabilistic approaches, such as PEER framework have been developed to predict the performance of building at any desired hazard levels. These procedures are so time-consuming, to which many details are needed to be assigned. It causes their usage to be limited. On that account, developing more straightforward methods seems indispensable. The main objective of the present paper is to adapt an equivalent static method in different damage states. Consequently, constant damage spectrums corresponding to different limit states, soil types, ductility and fundamental periods are plotted and tri-linear formulas are proposed for further applications. Moreover, the sensitivity of outcomes to the employed hysteresis model, ductility, viscous damping and site soil type is investigated. Finally, a case study building with moment-resisting R.C. frame is evaluated based on the both of new and current methods to ensure applicability of the proposed method.

Keywords

References

  1. Aghagholizadeh, M. and Massumi, A. (2012), "Relation between dynamic characteristics and damage index of RC-MRFs using non-linear incremental dynamic analyses", The 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (15WCEE), Lisbon, Portugal.
  2. Allahvirdizadeh, R., Khanmohammadi, M. and Marefat, M.S. (2013), "Investigating effects of scaling and selecting earthquake ground motions on performance-based design of R.C buildings", 4th International Conference on Concrete and Development, Tehran, Iran.
  3. ASCE7-10 (2010), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, Reston.
  4. Behnam, B., Sebt, M.H. and Vosoughifar, H.M. (2006), "Evaluating quality seismic damage index for urban residential buildings", Int. J. Civ. Eng., 4(2), 136-145.
  5. Bommer, J.J. and Pinho, R. (2006), "Adapting earthquake actions in Eurocode 8 for performance-based seismic design", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35(1), 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.530
  6. Calvi, G.M., Pinho, R., and Crowley, H. (2006), "State-of-the-knowledge on the period elongation of RC buildings during strong ground shaking", First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland.
  7. Chao, S.-H., Goel, S.C. and Lee, S.-S. (2007), "A seismic design lateral force distribution based on inelastic state of structures", Earthq. Spectra, 23(3), 547-569. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2753549
  8. Cornell, C.A. and Krawinkler, H. (2000), Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment, PEER Center News 2000, 3, 1-3.
  9. Dhakal, R.P. (2011), Structural Design for Earthquake Resistance: Past, Present and Future, Report for Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission: Department of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
  10. Erduran, E. and Yakut, A. (2004), "Drift based damage functions for reinforced concrete columns", Comput. Struct., 82(2), 121-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2003.10.003
  11. Estekanchi, H. and Arjomandi, K. (2007), "Comparison of damage indexes in nonlinear time history analysis of steel moment frames", Asian J. Civ. Eng. (Building and Housing), 8(6), 629-646.
  12. Fajfar, P. (1992), "Equivalent ductility factors, taking into account low-cycle fatigue", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 21(10), 837-848. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290211001
  13. FEMA-356 (2000), Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C., USA.
  14. Ghobarah, A. (2004), "On drift limits associated with different damage levels", Proceedings of an International Workshop on Performance-based Seismic Design Concepts and Implementation, Bled, Slovenia.
  15. Habibi, A.R. and Izadpanah, M. (2012), "Drift based damage functions for reinforced concrete moment resisting frames", J. Seismol. Earthq. Eng., 14(2), 117-129.
  16. ISIRI2800 (2005), Iranian code of practice for seismic resistant design of buildings, 3rd version, Tehran, Iran. (in Persian)
  17. Jiang, H., Fu, B. and Chen, L. (2013), "Damage-control seismic design of moment-resisting RC frame buildings", J. Asian Architect. Build. Eng., 12(1), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.12.49
  18. Jiang, H., Lu, X., Fu, B. and Chen, L. (2012), "Constant-damage yield strength spectra", Proceedings of the 15th World Conference of Earthquake Engineering (15WCEE), Lisbon, Portugal.
  19. Kamaris, G.S., Vallianatou, Y. and Beskos, D.E. (2012), "Seismic damage estimation of in-plane regular steel moment resisting and x-braced frames", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 10(6), 1745-1766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-012-9387-2
  20. Lu, Y., Gu, X. and Wei, J. (2009), "Prediction of seismic drifts in multi-storey frames with a new storey capacity factor", Eng. Struct., 31(2), 345-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.09.005
  21. Mikami, T. and Iemura, H. (2001), "Demand spectra of yield strength and ductility factor to satisfy the required seismic performance objectives", Proceedings of JSCE, Japan.
  22. Moustafa, A. (2011), "Damage-based design earthquake loads for single-degree-of-freedom inelastic structures", J. Struct. Eng., 137(3), 456-467. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000074
  23. Naeim, F. (2004), "Impact of the 1994 Northridge earthquake on the art and practice of structural engineering", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 13(5), 373-389. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.280
  24. Newmark, N.M. and Rosenblueth, E. (1971), Fundamentals of Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
  25. Panyakapo, P. (2004), "Evaluation of site-dependent constant-damage design spectra for reinforced concrete structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 33(12), 1211-1231. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.396
  26. Park, Y.-J. and Ang, A.H.S. (1985), "Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete", J. Struct. Eng., 111(4), 722-739. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(722)
  27. PEER. (2006), PEER NGA Database, Available at http://peer.berkeley.edu/nga
  28. Priestley, M.J.N., Calvi, G.M. and Kowalsky, M.J. (2007), Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
  29. Seifried, A.E. (2013), "Response spectrum compatibilization and its impact on structural response assessment", Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, California.
  30. Seismosoft. (2013), SeismoMatch v 2.1. Available at http://seismosoft.com.
  31. Sezen, H., Elwood, K.J., Whittaker, A.S., Mosalam, K.M., Wallace, J.W. and Stanton, J.F. (2000), Structural engineering reconnaissance of the August 17, 1999 earthquake: Kocaeli (Izmit), Turkey: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), California.
  32. Takeda, T., Sozen, M.A. and Nielsen, N.N. (1970), "Reinforced concrete response to simulated earthquakes", J. Struct. Div., 96(12), 2557-2573.
  33. UBC-97 (1997), Uniform Building Code, Whittier, California.
  34. Wang, M.-L. and Shah, S.P. (1987), "Reinforced concrete hysteresis model based on the damage concept", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 15(8), 993-1003. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290150806
  35. Xue, Q. (2000), "Need of performance-based earthquake engineering in Taiwan: a lesson from the Chichi earthquake", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 29(11), 1609-1627. https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-9845(200011)29:11<1609::AID-EQE977>3.0.CO;2-M

Cited by

  1. Probabilistic comparative investigation on introduced performance-based seismic design and assessment criteria vol.151, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.08.029
  2. Reliability evaluation of predicted structural performances using nonlinear static analysis vol.15, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0062-x
  3. Nonlinear modeling of cyclic response of RC beam–column joints reinforced by plain bars vol.16, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0399-4
  4. Seismic performance assessments of precast energy dissipation shear wall structures under earthquake sequence excitations vol.18, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2020.18.2.147