DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Suffciency Conditions for Hypergeometric Functions to be in a Subclasses of Analytic Functions

  • Aouf, Mohamed Kamal (Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University) ;
  • Mostafa, Adela Osman (Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Damietta University, Mansoura University) ;
  • Zayed, Hanaa Mousa (Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Menofia University)
  • Received : 2015.01.17
  • Accepted : 2015.11.03
  • Published : 2016.03.23

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to introduce sufficient conditions for (Gaussian) hypergeometric functions to be in various subclasses of analytic functions. Also, we investigate several mapping properties involving these subclasses.

Keywords

References

  1. M. K. Aouf, A. O. Mostafa and H. M. Zayed, Necessity and suFFciency for hypergeometric functions to be in a subclass of analytic functions, J. Egyptian Math. Soc., 23(2015), 476-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joems.2015.01.002
  2. S. D. Bernardi, Convex and starlike univalent functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 135(1969), 429-446. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1969-0232920-2
  3. B. C. Carlson and S. B. Shaffer, Starlike and prestarlike hypergrometric functions, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 15(2002), 737-745.
  4. P. L. Duren, Univalent Functions, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1983.
  5. J. Dziok and H. M. Srivastava, Classes of analytic functions associated with the generalized hypergeometric function, Appl. Math. Comput., 103(1999), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0427(98)00235-0
  6. J. Dziok and H. M. Srivastava, Certain subclasses of analytic functions associated with the generalized hypergeometric functions, Integral Transforms Spec. Funct., 14(2003), 7-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10652460304543
  7. R. M. El-Ashwah, M. K. Aouf and H. M. Zayed, On certain subclass of analytic functions defined by convolution, Mat. Vesnik, 66(3)(2014), 248-264.
  8. Yu. E. Hohlov, Operators and operations in the class of univalent functions, Izv. Vyss. Ucebn. Zaved. Matematika, 10(1978), 83-89 (in Russian).
  9. S. Kanas and H. M. Srivastava, Linear operators associated with k-uniformly convex functions, Integral Transform. Spec. Funct., 9(2)(2000), 121-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/10652460008819249
  10. J. A. Kim and K. H. Shon, Mapping properties for convolutions involving hypergeo-metric functions, Internat. J. Math. Math. Sci., 17(2003), 1083-1091.
  11. V. Kiryakova, Criteria for univalence of the Dziok-Srivastava and the Srivastava-Wright operators in the class A, Appl. Math. Comput., 218(2011), 883-892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2011.01.076
  12. T. H. MacGregor, The radius of convexity for starlike function of order ${\alpha}$, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 14(1963), 71-76.
  13. S. S. Miller and P. T. Mocanu, Differential Subordinations: Theory and Applications, Series on Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and Appl. Math. No. 255 Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 2000.
  14. B. Pinchuk, On the starlike and convex functions of order ${\alpha}$, Duke Math. J., 35(1968), 721-734. https://doi.org/10.1215/S0012-7094-68-03575-8
  15. M. S. Robertson, On the theory of univalent functions, Ann. Math. , 37(1936), 374-408. https://doi.org/10.2307/1968451
  16. St. Ruscheweyh, New criteria for univalent functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 49(1975), 109-115. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1975-0367176-1
  17. A. Schild, On starlike function of order ${\alpha}$, Amer. J. Math., 87(1965), 65-70. https://doi.org/10.2307/2373224
  18. N. Shukla and P. Shukla, Mapping properties of analytic function defined by hypergeometric function. II, Soochow J. Math., 25(1)(1999), 29-36.
  19. H. M. Srivastava, Some Fox-Wright generalized hypergeometric functions and associ-ated families of convolution operators, Appl. Anal. Discrete Math., 1(2007), 56-71. https://doi.org/10.2298/AADM0701056S