DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

수준별 대학수학 수업의 학습유형 분석에 관한 연구: 공과대학생을 대상으로

A Study on Learning Style of Level-Differentiated College Mathematics Classes: Focusing on College of Engineering Students

  • 투고 : 2015.12.02
  • 심사 : 2016.03.03
  • 발행 : 2016.03.31

초록

본 연구는 수준별 대학수학교과목을 수강하는 학생들의 학습유형을 분석하여 그 상관관계를 이용하여 보다 효율적인 대학수학 수업이 이루어지기 위한 기초자료를 얻고자한다. 이를 위하여 Kolb 학습유형 분석을 이용하여 일 개 대학교 공과대학의 수준별로 진행되는 대학수학교과목 수업 상하 각 3반 213명을 대상으로 연구를 진행하였고 유의미한 결과를 분석하였다. 연구 결과 첫째, 수준별 수업 중 상반의 학습유형은 확산자, 적용자, 동화자, 수렴자 순이었다. 둘째, 수준별 수업 중 하반의 학습유형은 적용자, 확산자, 동화자, 수렴자 순이었다. 셋째, 상반 학생들의 효율적인 수업을 위해서 교수자는 학생 스스로 수학적 문제를 분석해 볼 수 있는 충분한 시간을 제공해야 한다. 넷째, 하반의 효율적인 수업을 위해서 교수자는 실험적이고 다양한 교수 방법을 이용하여 학생들의 집중력과 학업성취 욕구를 높여야 한다. 이 연구를 바탕으로 대학수학 수업에서 각각 학생들의 학습유형에 적합하고 대학수학 교육과정의 성격에 부합하는 교수법의 개발이 필요함을 제언하였다.

This study examined the level-differentiated mathematic classes to offer basic data for effective college mathematics curriculum. Using the Kolb Learning Style, this study surveyed 213 college engineering students in 6 level-differentiated classes in one university and analyzed the significant consequence. The results showed that the ranking of the Learning Style in a superior mathematic class is Diverger, Accommodator, Assimilator, and Converger. Second, the ranking of the Learning Style in the inferior mathematics class was Accommodator, Diverger, Assimilator, and Converger. Third, for effective class of superior mathematics class, professors need to give sufficient time to analyze mathematics problems by the students themselves. Fourth, for an effective class of inferior mathematic class, professors need to use experimental and diverse teaching method to enhance the students' concentration and learning achievement. Based on this study, professors should develop teaching methods that fit the students' Learning Style and the properties of college mathematics curriculum.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. H. K. Chun, "The relationship between learning styles and majors of college students". The Graduate School of Yonsei University, 2002.
  2. Kolb, D.A., Experiential Learning: Experience as the source of learning and development, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1984.
  3. S. H. Yang, E. H. Ha, O. C. Lee, I. O. Sim, Y. M. Park, H. A. Nam, J. S. Kim, "Academic Achievement, Self-directed Learning, and Critical Thinking Disposition According to Learning Styles of Nursing Students," The Korean journal of fundamentals of nursing, Vol. 19 No. 3 pp. 334-342, 2012. https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2012.19.3.334
  4. E. J. Kim, "A Study of the Relationship between Types and Elements of Learning Styles and Curriculum," The Graduate School of Yonsei University, Seoul, 1999.
  5. S. H. Park, J. Y. Jung, J. Y. Hong, S. O. Kim, Y. O. Loo, E. Y. Kang, "A Development of Kolb's Learning Style Based Team Organization Support System," Journal of The Korean Association of information Education, Vol. 12. No. 1 pp. 9-22, 2008.
  6. G. J. Han, J. J. Seo, "The effort of attitude and mathematic achievement for grouping by learning style," Communication of Mathematical Education, ser E, Vol. 15. No. 10 pp. 287-292, 2003.
  7. Y. N. Koh, "A Study on the Relationship among Academic Achievement, Career Decision, and Learning Styles of College Students," The Korea Association of Yeolin Education, Vol. 13 No. 3 pp. 215-234, 2005.
  8. K. J. An, "Learning Styles and Preferred Learning Methods of Undergraduate Nursing Students". The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, Vol. 13. No. 1 pp. 13-22, 2007.
  9. J. M. Kim, "Personality Type, Learning Style, Self-Direction and Academic Achievement in Nursing Student," Journal of Future Oriented Youth Society, Vol. 7. No. 2 pp. 1-25, 2010.
  10. S. Y. Im, B. C. Lee, H. S. Chai, M. S. Ahn, W. I. Lee, "Development of the Kolb LSI 3.1 Korean Version," The journal of Korean institute for practical engineering education, Vol. 4. No. 1 pp. 30-44, 2012.
  11. J. H. Park, The Relationship among Self-determined Learning Motivation, Learning Attitude and Academic Achievement Depending on Experiential Learning Style of Pre-college Students, The Graduate School of Chonbuk National University, Chonbuk, 2015.
  12. Kolb. D.A. Ruvin. I.M., McIntyre. J., Organizational psychology, An experiential approach, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1971.
  13. Kolb. A.Y., Kolb. D.A. The Kolb Learning Style Inventory Version 3.1, Technical Specification, 2005.
  14. Kolb, D.A., Learning styles and disciplinary differences. In A. W. Chickering and Associates(Eds.), The Modern American College, San Francisco:Jossey-Bass, 1981.
  15. M. N. Jun, "Deep approach to Learning according to the Kolb-McCarthy's learning styles". Korean Educational psychology Association, 2004.
  16. McCarthy, B, "The 4MAT system: Teaching in learning styles with right left mode techniques," Oak Brook, IL: Excel, Inc, 1987.
  17. Carthey, J,H, "Relationship between learning style and academic achievement and brain hemispheric dominance and academic performance in business and accounting courses, ERIC Document; ED374412, 1993.
  18. Riding, R,J, Rayner, S, "Cognitive style and learning strategies; Understanding style differences in learning and behavior," London: David Fulton Publication, 2002.
  19. H. S. Kwon,. "Effects of self-regulated learning strategy on academic achievement and learning attitude according to learning styles". The Graduate School of Korea National University of Education, 2007.
  20. G. H. Lee, S. J. Lee, "A Study on the relationship between learning styles of students and academic achievement in mathematics-Focusing on freshmen enrolled in a college of science and engineering of the medium sized university," Communication of Mathematical Education, Ser E, Vol. 27. No. 4 pp. 473-486, 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2013.27.4.473
  21. Karuppan, C,M, "Web-based teaching materials; a user's profire," Internet Research, Vol11, No2, 2001. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10662240110695106