Educational Technology International

  • 제17권1호
  • /
  • Pages.1-37
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1598-5776(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2289-0300(eISSN)
한국교육공학회 (The Korean Society for Education Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Development of a MOOC Design Model

  • 투고 : 2016.03.20
  • 심사 : 2016.04.07
  • 발행 : 2016.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study was to develop a MOOC design model that would improve the current practice of MOOC development in Korea by specifying easy-to-use course development procedures and guiding strategies. Following Richey and Klein (2007)'s conceptual model development procedure, the first step was to perform critical review of relevant literature and observe typical MOOC development processes. As a result, the initial model was developed. The second step was to conduct the expert review with five educational technology and MOOC researchers to secure the internal validity of the model. Based on the experts' suggestions, the model was revised and once again reviewed by the same experts. This process resulted in the development of the 2nd version of model. The third step was to carry out external validation research in order to test the effectiveness, efficiency, and usability of the model. A basic model may be confirmed or corrected based on examination of its results. Consequently, the model was elaborated as the final model. In the final model, 6 procedural phases and 9 specific steps were included. The six procedural phases are: Analysis (1st Iteration), Design, Development (Course Development), Implementation, Evaluation, and Analysis (2nd Iteration), a slight variation of ADDIE model. The specific steps include: 1) Goal Setting, 2) Environment Analysis, 3) Content Design, 4) Style Design, 5) Course Development, 6) Implementation Plan, 7) Course Implementation, 8) Summative Evaluation, and 9) Need Reflection. The study concluded with suggestions for further research and application of the MOOC design model.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alonson, F., Lopez, G., Manrique, D., & Vines, J. M. (2005). An instructional model for web-based e-learning education with a blended learning process approach, British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 217-235.
  2. Armstrong, L. (2012). Coursera and MITx: Sustaining or disruptive? [Web logmessage]. Retrieved from http://www.changinghighereducation.com/2012/08/coursera-.html
  3. Clara, M. & Barbera, E. (2014). Learning online: massive open online courses (MOOCs), connectivism, and cultural psychology. Distance Education, 34(1), 129-136.
  4. Chung, H. M. (2008). A Study on e-learning ID process and instructional designer's need Analysis on e-learning design & development models, Journal of Educational Technology, 24(3), 85-124.
  5. Driscoll, M. (2002). Web-based training: creating e-learning experiences. San francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/ Pfeiffer.
  6. edX. (2013). Best practices for learner communications. Boston: edX.
  7. Guardia, L., Maina, M., & Sangra, A. (2013). MOOC design principles: A pedagogical approach from the learner's perspective. eLearning Papers, (33).
  8. Gustafson, K., & Branch, R. (1997). Survey of instructional development models. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology.
  9. Jung, I. S. (1997). Network-Based ISD model for distance learning design of corporate education, a way for the 21st Korean corporate education. Journal of Korean Society for Learning and Performance, 44-63.
  10. Kang, M. H., Kang, I. A., Song, S. H., Lim, C. I., Jo, I. H., Choi, S. J., & Heo, H. O. (2007). The design of an e-learning contents for future. Goyang: seohyeonsa.
  11. Kim, S. Y. (2013). Development of e-learning design strategies based on learning activity adapting to expertise level. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University.
  12. Kukharenko, V. (2013). Designing massive open online courses. In ICTERI (pp. 273-280).
  13. Lee, I. S. (2002). E-learning: the new paradigm of cyber space. Seoul: moonumsa.
  14. Lee, W. W., & Owen, D. L. (2000). Multimedia-based instructional design, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/ Pfeiffer.
  15. Lee, Y. T. (2013). Development study of learning environment design principles and model based on collective intelligence for improving creative design ability in engineering education. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University.
  16. R. Legon, MOOCs and the Quality Question, Washington, Inside Higher Ed, 2012 URL:http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2013/04/25/moocs-do-not-represent-best- onlinelearning-essay.
  17. Lim, C. I., Kim, S. Y., Kim, M. H., Han, S. L., & Seo, S. I. (2014). Focus on the case of Seoul National University: a case study on MOOCs design and implementation. Paper presented at the Korean Association for Educational Information and Media Conference 2015 spring, Seoul, Republic of Kora.
  18. Lim, K., & Kim, M. H. (2014). A SWOT analysis of design elements of Korean MOOCs. Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(6), 615-624.
  19. Rha, I. J. (2015). Understanding MOOCs in a global learning age. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  20. Rha, I. J., & Chung, H. M. (2001). Developing an action model for WBI design. Journal of Educational Technology, 17(2), 91-115.
  21. Richey, R.C & Klein J.D. 2007. Design and Development Research Methods, Strategies, and. Issues. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  22. Rubio, D. M., Berg-Weger, M., Tebb, S. S., Lee, S., & Rauch, S. (2003). Objectifying content validity: conducting a content validity study in social work research. Social Work Research, 27(2), 94-105.
  23. Scagnoli, N. I. (n.d.). Instructional design of a MOOC. Retrieved from: https://ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/44835/Instructional%Design%of%a%MOOC.pdf