DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

광역버스 차내혼잡도 완화의 경제적 편익측정에 관한 연구

Measuring Social Benefit of Mitigation of In-Vehicle Congestion Level in Intercity Buses

  • 류시균 (경기연구원 북부연구센터) ;
  • 한시원 (서울시청 버스정책과) ;
  • 유재상 (경기연구원 북부연구센터)
  • RYU, Sikyun (Center for Studies of Northern Gyeonggi, Gyeonggi Research Institute) ;
  • HAN, Siwon (Bus Policy Division, City Transportation Headquarter, Seoul Metropolitan Government) ;
  • YOU, Jaesang (Center for Studies of Northern Gyeonggi, Gyeonggi Research Institute)
  • 투고 : 2016.09.12
  • 심사 : 2016.12.08
  • 발행 : 2016.12.30

초록

본 연구는 수도권지역을 운행하는 광역버스를 대상으로 차내혼잡도 완화의 편익측정방법론 개발을 목적으로 하고 있다. 비시장재의 편익측정방법론에 대한 조사, 분석을 통해서 조건부가치측정법을 조사기법으로, Tobit모형을 측정모형으로 선정하였다. 설문조사를 통해서 992개의 유효표본이 얻어졌으며 연령, 소득수준, 버스탑승시간, 통행목적, 혼잡도 등을 설명변수로, 광역버스 차내혼잡도 완화에 대한 추가지불의사액을 종속변수로 하는 Tobit모형을 추정하였다. 통계적 검정과 논리적 검정을 통해서 모형의 적합도가 검정되었으며 모형으로부터 산출된 광역버스 차내혼잡도 완화에 대한 추가지불의사액을 경기도가 인가한 광역버스 이용실태에 적용한 결과, 수도권 지역에서 광역버스 좌석제를 시행할 경우 일평균 약 61백만 원, 연간 약 147억 원의 편익이 발생할 것으로 추정되었다.

The purpose of this study is to develope a method for measuring social benefit by mitigating in-vehicle congestion level in intercity buses. Contingent valuation method and Tobit model are adopted for social benefit evaluation method. One thousand passengers were interviewed with 992 obtained valid samples. Tobit models with age, income level, and bus boarding times as explanatory variables are selected to estimate the willingness to pay for the mitigation of intercity bus in-vehicle congestion. Statistically and logically, two models with age or income level as explanatory variables are turned out to be valid. The intercity bus service supply status and usage are examined and the bus users who have willingness-to-pay for the intercity bus in-vehicle congestion mitigation have been identified. In case of the 'no standing' rules implemented to the intercity bus, the annual economic benefit from the service is estimated to be 14.7 billion won.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ameniya T. (1981), Qualitative Response Models: A Survey, Jour. of Economic Literature, 19, 1483-1536.
  2. Cheon I. H. (1998), Theory and Policy of Environmental Economics.
  3. Cho H. S. (2013), A Study on the Benefit of Driving Amenity Based on Highway Density, J. Korean Soc. Transp., 31(5), Korean Society of Transportation, 48-59. https://doi.org/10.7470/jkst.2013.31.5.048
  4. Choi Y. E. (2008), The Valuation of Crowding Relief in Heavy Rail Transit, Graduated School of Environmental Studies Seoul National University.
  5. Choi Y. E., Kim S. S., Lee C. J., Kim M. S. (2008), The Valuation of Passenger Comfort Benefits in Urban Railroads, 2008 Spring Conference of the Korean Society for Railway.
  6. Gu S. J. (2008), Analyzing the Determinants of the Wireless Internet Consumption Expenditure, Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 21(3).
  7. Han B. S., Jang H. H. (2009), An Empirical Study on the Determinants of Cargo Volumes in Flow into Major Korean Ports Based on the Cluster Theory, Korea Logistics Review, 19(3).
  8. Heo J. W. (2005), Estimation of the Economics Value of Non-market Tourist Attractions Using CVM: The Case of Information Bias in Open-Ended Question Formats, International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 19(3).
  9. Jeon S. M. (2009), A Study on the Improvement of Value Assessment Method of Railway, Seoul National University of Science and Technology: Graduate School of Railway, Master of Engineering.
  10. Jeon S. M., Sung D. Y., Go D. C., Park Y. G. (2008), A Study of Reasonable Improvement of Economical Value Assesment Method of Railway, 2008 Fall Conference of the Korean Society for Railway.
  11. Jeoung B. D., Park J. W., Kim G. C. (1999), Review of Railway Projects Evaluation Methodologies considering the Benefit Incidence, 1999 Fall Conference of the Korean Society for Railway.
  12. Kang P. N., Choi S. Y. (2008), A Study on the Dwelling Preference Decision Using Conjoint Analysis The Case of Residents in Mokpocity as Small and Medium-Sized Cities, Journal of Residential Environmental Institute of Korea, 6(1).
  13. Kim G. T., Lee J. S., Park B. H. (2010), Estimation of the Optimum Number of Rail Cars to Increase the Benefit, International journal of railway, 13(3).
  14. Kim H. G. (2012), An Analysis on Determinants of Expenditures Visit to 2012 WACS Congress Dae-Jeon by Using a Tobit Model, Journal Of KRDA, 2(2).
  15. Kim K. S. (2009), A Study on Valuation Measurement of Non-market Goods: Focusing on the Bid Design of Double-bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Method(CVM), KDI.
  16. Kim S. Y. (2011), A Study on the Extended Cost/Benefit Analysis of the Road Projects Using Contingent Valuation Method, Kwangwoon University, Ph.D.
  17. Kim Y. Y. (2014), A Study on Application of New Benefit for Economics Improvement of Railroad Construction Projects, Woosong University, Master of Engineering.
  18. KOTI (2006), A Study on Socioeconomic Valuation for Railway.
  19. KOTI (2008), A Study on Standard Guidelines for Pre-feasibility Study on Railway Projects.
  20. KOTI (2009), Research for Revising the Evaluation Criteria of Socio-Economic Values in the Transportation Sector.
  21. Kwon O. S. (2005), Environmental Economics.
  22. Kwon Y. S., Lee J. G., Shon Y. T. (2006), Study for Benefit Calculation of Bicycle Roadway Construction Using Contingent Valuation Method, Journal of Civil Engineering, 26(6D).
  23. Lee C. K. (2005), Valuation of Eco-tourism Resources for DMZ Using a Contingent Valuation Method: International Comparison of Values, Journal of KASTLE, 17(4).
  24. Lee J. J. (2010), Environmental Economics.
  25. Lee J. J. (2011), Comprehension of Environmental Economics.
  26. Nam D. H., Heo H. M., Lee J. S. (2012), Environmental Benefit Analysis for Railroad-related Projects, Journal of The Korean Society For Railway, 15(2).
  27. Nam D. H., Lee J. S., Min B. Y. (2011), Current Methodologies for Environmental Impact Studies of Railroad-related Projects, 2011 Spring Conference of the Korean Society for Railway.
  28. Nick Hanley, Clive L. Spash (1994), Cost-Benefit analysis and the Environment.
  29. No B. K., Jin H. G., Kim S. (2010), An Improved Methodology for the (Preliminary) Feasibility Study in Railroad Project, 2010 Fall Conference of the Korean Society for Railway.
  30. Oh M. Y., Kim S. S., Kim M. J. (2002), Analyzing Efficiency in the Seoul's Urban Bus Industry Using Data Envelopment Analysis, J. Korean Soc. Transp., 20(2), Korean Society of Transportation, 59-68.
  31. Oono E. (大野栄治, 2000), Environment of Economic Assessment business.
  32. Park B. E., Jang B. H., Han S. W., Kim D. G., Park G. H. (2006), A Study of the Benefit Cost of The Railway Nosie, 2006 Spring Conference Transactions of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering.
  33. Park E. T. (2011), Economic Dictionary.
  34. Park J. H. (2000), Environmental Economics.
  35. Pyo S. H. (2012), The Comparative Study of Public Library Valuation Using CVM: Case of the Payment Vehicles, Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 29(2).
  36. Robert Dorfman, Nancy S. Dorfman (1993), Economics of the Environment.
  37. Seo S. B. (2006), A Discussion of Comfort in Railway, Railway Journal, 9(3).
  38. Seo S. B. (2013), A Study of Comfort Assessment such as Ride Comfort, Waiting Comfort and Travel Sickness in Railway, Railway Journal, 16(4).
  39. Shin H. S., Cho H. W., Kim J. M., Lee W. T. (2009), A Study on the Alternatives for Realization of Benefit Cost Analysis in Railway Projects - More Focused on Benefits for the Value of Travel Time, 2009 Fall Conference of the Korean Society for Railway.
  40. Ueda K. (植田和弘, 1997), Environmental Economics.
  41. Won D. H. (2008), A Study on Non-Market Value of Bio-Fuels, KEEI.
  42. Yang J. K., Kim K., Woon D. H., Park D. J. (2011), A Study on the Calculating and Improving Railway Logistics Benefit Items, Korea Logistics Review, 21(1).
  43. You S. Y., Lee S. J., Park J. H. (2007), A Risk Assessment of Rail Using a Reliability Benefit Measure, 2007 The 56th Proceedings of the KOR-KST Conference.

피인용 문헌

  1. 고속철도 차량 내 혼잡도 완화에 대한 지불 용의액 추정 연구 vol.37, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12652/ksce.2017.37.2.0379