References
- Kuszyk BS, Heath DG, Bliss DF, et al. Skeletal 3-D CT: advantages of volume rendering over surface rendering. Skeletal Radiol 1996;25:207-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002560050066
- Choi JW, Kim N. Clinical application of three-dimensional printing technology in craniofacial plastic surgery. Arch Plast Surg 2015;42:267-77. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2015.42.3.267
- Whyms BJ, Vorperian HK, Gentry LR, et al. The effect of computed tomographic scanner parameters and 3-dimensional volume rendering techniques on the accuracy of linear, angular, and volumetric measurements of the mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013;115:682-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2013.02.008
- Shaw RB Jr, Kahn DM. Aging of the midface bony elements: a three-dimensional computed tomographic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;119:675-81. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000246596.79795.a8
- Pessa JE, Slice DE, Hanz KR, et al. Aging and the shape of the mandible. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:196-200. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000293864.94138.ae
- Oh S, Kim CY, Hong J. A comparative study between data obtained from conventional lateral cephalometry and reconstructed three-dimensional computed tomography images. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;40:123-9. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2014.40.3.123
Cited by
- Method of Individual Adjustment for 3D CT Analysis: Linear Measurement vol.2016, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6893072