DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Cleaning agents efficiency in cleaning of polymeric and ceramic membranes fouled by natural organic matter

  • Urbanowska, Agnieszka (Department of Environmental Engineering, Institute of Environment Protection Engineering, Wrocław University of Technology) ;
  • Kabsch-Korbutowicz, Malgorzata (Department of Environmental Engineering, Institute of Environment Protection Engineering, Wrocław University of Technology)
  • Received : 2014.09.26
  • Accepted : 2015.11.13
  • Published : 2016.01.25

Abstract

Ultrafiltration is known to be one of the most commonly applied techniques in water treatment. Membrane fouling is the main limiting factor in terms of process efficiency and restricting it to the manageable degree is crucial. Natural organic matter is often found to be a major foulant in surface waters. Among many known fouling prevention techniques, the membrane chemical cleaning is widely employed. This study focuses on evaluating the cleaning efficiency of polymeric and ceramic membranes with the use of various chemicals. The influence of cleaning agent type and its concentration, membrane material and its MWCO, and cleaning process duration on the recovery of membrane flux was analyzed. Results have shown that, regardless of membrane type and MWCO, the most effective cleaning agent was NaOH.

Keywords

References

  1. Ajmani, G.S., Cho, H.-H., Chalew, T.E.A., Schwab, K.J., Jacangelo, J.G. and Huang, H. (2014), "Static and dynamic removal of aquatic natural organic matter by carbon nanotubes", Water Res., 59, 262-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.04.030
  2. Bird, M.R. and Barlett, M. (2002), "Measuring and modelling flux recovery during the chemical cleaning of MF membranes for the processing of whey protein concentrate", J. Food Eng., 53(2), 143-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(01)00151-0
  3. Bond, T., Templeton, M.R., Rifai, O., Ali, H. and Graham, N.J.D. (2014), "Chlorinated and nitrogenous disinfection by-product formation from ozonation and post-chlorination of natural organic matter surrogates", Chemosphere, 111, 218-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.03.090
  4. Filella, M. (2014), "Understanding what we are measuring: Standards and quantification of natural organic matter", Water Res., 50, 287-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.12.015
  5. Gao, W., Lianga, H., Ma, J., Han, M., Chen, Z., Han, Z. and Li, G. (2011), "Membrane fouling control in ultrafiltration technology for drinking water production: A review", Desalination, 272(1-3), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.01.051
  6. He, Y., Sharba, J., Bogati, R., Liao, B.Q., Goodwin, C. and Marshall, K. (2014), "Impacts of aging and chemical cleaning on the properties and performance of ultrafiltration membranes in potable water treatment", Sep. Sci. Technol., 49(9), 1317-1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2014.882359
  7. Judd, S. and Jefferson, B. (2003), Membranes for Industrial Wastewater Recovery and Re-use, Elsevier, Oxford, UK.
  8. Kim, H.-C., Hong, J.-H. and Lee, S. (2006), "Fouling of microfiltration membranes by natural organic matter after coagulation treatment: A comparison of different initial mixing conditions", J. Membr. Sci., 283(1-2), 266-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.06.041
  9. Konieczny, K., Rajca, M., Bodzek, M. and Kwiecinska, A. (2009), "Water treatment using hybrid method of coagulation and low-pressure membrane filtration", Environ. Protect. Eng., 35(1), 5-22.
  10. Lee, H., Amy, G., Cho, J., Yoon, Y., Moon, S.-H. and Kim, I.S. (2001), "Cleaning strategies for flux recovery of an ultrafiltration membrane fouled by natural organic matter", Water Res., 35(14), 3301-2208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00063-X
  11. Li, S.-J. and Kim, J.-H. (2014), "Differential natural organic matter fouling of ceramic versus polymeric ultrafiltration membranes", Water Res., 48, 43-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.08.038
  12. Matilainen, A., Vepsalainen, M. and Sillanpaa, M. (2010), "Natural organic matter removal by coagulation during drinking water treatment: A review", Adv. Colloid Interf. Sci., 159(2), 189-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2010.06.007
  13. Metsamuuronen, S., Sillanpaa, M., Bhatnagar, A. and Manttari, M. (2014), "Natural organic matter removal from drinking water by membrane technology", Sep. Purif. Rev., 43(1), 1-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/15422119.2012.712080
  14. Porcelli, N. and Judd, S. (2010), "Chemical cleaning of potable water membranes: A review", Sep. Purif. Technol., 71(2), 137-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2009.12.007
  15. Urbanowska, A. and Kabsch-Korbutowicz, M. (2015), "The properties of NOM particles removed from water in ultrafiltration, ion exchange and integrated processes", Desal. Water Treat., 1-9. DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2015.1028460
  16. Uyak, V., Akdagli, M., Cakmakci, M. and Koyuncu, I. (2014), "Natural organic matter removal and fouling in a low pressure hybrid membrane systems", The Scientific World Journal, 1-11.
  17. Yamamura, H., Kenji, O., Kimura, K. and Watanabe, Y. (2014a), "Hydrophilic fraction of natural organic matter causing irreversible fouling of microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes", Water Res., 54, 123-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.01.024
  18. Yamamura, H., Kimura, K. and Watanabe, Y. (2014b), "Seasonal variation of effective chemical solution for cleaning of ultrafiltration membrane treating a surface water", Sep. Purif. Technol., 132, 110-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2014.04.043
  19. Yunos, M.Z., Harun, Z., Basri, H. and Ismail, A.F. (2014), "Studies on fouling by natural organic matter (NOM) on polysulfone membranes: Effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG)", Desalination, 333(1), 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.11.019
  20. Zondervan, E. and Roffel, B. (2007), "Evaluation of different cleaning agents used for cleaning ultrafiltration membranes fouled by surface water", J. Membr. Sci., 304(1-2), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2007.06.041
  21. Zularisam, A.W., Ismail, A.F. and Salim, R. (2006), "Behaviours of natural organic matter in membrane filtration for surface water treatment-A review", Desalination, 194(1-3), 211-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.10.030

Cited by

  1. Iron(III) removal from aqueous solution using MCM-41 ceramic composite membrane vol.7, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/mwt.2016.7.6.495
  2. Impact of quorum quenching bacteria on biofouling retardation in submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) vol.9, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/mwt.2018.9.4.279
  3. Reduction of energy demand for UF cross-flow membranes in MBR by sponge ball cleaning vol.12, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/mwt.2021.12.2.065