DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study of Reading of Major Subject Books by Liberal Arts College Students: Focusing on a University

문과대학 학생들의 전공독서 실태 분석 연구: A대학교를 중심으로

  • Received : 2016.11.11
  • Accepted : 2016.12.29
  • Published : 2016.12.31

Abstract

This survey was conducted to investigate liberal arts college students' academic reading, to explore basic issues in their reading, and to provide how to improve their academic reading in their majors. The participants in this study were 457 students who enrolled in a college of liberal arts in a university. The study results represented as follows. Firstly, there were significant differences in vocabulary, reading comprehension, and fast-reading competence among student groups of different majors. Secondly, 66.9% of the students did not read widely in their major subjects throughout all departments. 67.7% of the students with low reading performance responded that they could complete college courses only with course textbook reading, course participation, and requirement submission. Thirdly, regarding the number of major subject books that the participants read, 82.1% of the students read less than 15 books, while 11.3% read less than a book. The students' academic reading hours during per week were less than 5 hours for 68.9% students and less than 10 hours for 13.9% respectively. Based on the results (departmental differences in reading competence, wide reading in major subject books, and liberal arts students' reading hours), liberal arts colleges need to design programs to guarantee quality and quantity in reading major subject books.

본 연구는 A대학교 문과대학 학생들을 중심으로 독서역량과 전공독서 실태를 조사 분석하여 문제점을 파악, 개선방안을 모색하기 위해 수행되었다. A대학교 문과대학에 재학 중인 1~4학년 남녀 학생 457명을 분석한 결과, 첫째 학과별 독서역량에 집단 간 어휘력과 독해력, 속독력에서 유의한 차이를 보였다. 둘째 전공독서 실태에서는 전체 학과에서 독서를 하지 않는 학생이 66.9%에 달하고, 그 이유가 교재만으로 수업과 과제수행이 가능하기 때문이라는 응답(67.7%)이 많았다. 셋째 전체 전공독서량을 조사한 결과 82.1%가 15권미만이고, 11.3%가 1권 미만으로 나타났다. 일주일간의 전공독서시간이 5시간미만 68.9%, 10시간미만 13.9%로 나타났다. 본 연구에서는 이 같은 문제(독서역량 학과 간 편차, 전공독서 여부 및 독서량, 시간 등)를 토대로, 전공독서의 양과 질을 넓혀갈 수 있는 방안을 강구할 것을 제언한다.

Keywords

References

  1. 강홍구 외. 2014. 2014 대학도서관 통계분석 자료집. 대구: 한국교육학술정보원.(Kang, Hong-Gu Others. 2014. University Library Statistical 2014 Analysis Kit, Daegu: Korea Education and Research Information Service.)
  2. 김선남, 강혜영. 2007. 대학생의 독서태도와 미디어 활용에 관한 연구. 서지학연구, 36: 217-240.(Kim, Sun-Nam, Hye-Young Kang. 2007. "A Study on College Students' Reading Attitudes and Media Utilizations." Journal of the Institute of Bibliography, 36: 217-240.)
  3. 손정표. 2015. 신독서지도방법론. 대구: 태일사. [원전 : Gray W.S. 1960. "The Major Aspects of Reading". Sequential Development of Reading Abilities. ed. by Helen M. Robinson(Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press)](Son, Jeong-Pyo, New reading instruction methods, Daegu: Taelisa [Original : Gray W.S. 1960. "The Major Aspects of Reading". Sequential Development of Reading Abilities. ed. by Helen M. Robinson(Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press)])
  4. 이경민. 2012. 대학도서관에서 대학생 독서지도 방안에 관한 연구. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 43(4): 161-181.(Lee, Kyung-Min. 2012. "A Study of Reading Education Methods for University Students in University Libraries." Journal of Korean library and information science society, 43(4): 161-181.)
  5. 이종문. 2010. 우리나라 대학생들의 문헌 독해능력 평가 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 21(3): 17-27.(Lee, Jong-Moon. "A study on the Evaluation of Reading Ability for the Literature Reading of Korean College Students: the Freshmen of A University." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society For Library And Information Science, 21(3): 17-27.)
  6. 창신대학교. 2014. 2015학년도 신입생 모집안내. 창원: 창신대학교.(Changshin University, 2014. 2015 recruiting year guidance, Changwon: Changshin University)
  7. 문화일보 (2006. 4. 22) [인용 2016. 12. 15](The Munhwa Ilbo(2006. 4. 22) [인용 2016. 12. 15])
  8. 문화체육관광부 홈페이지. [인용 2016. 8. 7].(Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism Homepage. [인용 2016.8.7].)
  9. OECD 국제성인역량조사 홈페이지. [인용 2015. 8. 25].(OECD PIAAC Home Page. [cited 2015. 8. 25].)