DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Numerical study of a new constructive sequence for movable scaffolding system (MSS) application

  • Received : 2016.06.04
  • Accepted : 2016.12.15
  • Published : 2016.09.25

Abstract

This paper consists in a study of a new contructive sequence of road viaducts with Movable Scaffolding System (MSS) using numerical tools based on finite element method (FEM). Traditional and new sequences are being used in Spain to build viaducts with MSS. The new sequence permits an easier construction of one span per week but implies some other issues related to the need of two prestressing stages per span. In order to improve the efficiency of the new sequence by reducing the number of prestressing stages per span, two solutions are suggested in this study. Results show that the best solution is to introduce the 100% of the prestressing force at the self-supporting core in order to improve the road viaduct construction with movable scaffolding system by reducing execution time without increasing economic costs.

Keywords

References

  1. ACI Committee 209 (1997), "Prediction of creep, shrinkage and temperature effects in concrete structures", ACI 209 R-92, American Concrete Institute Detroit.
  2. Bazant, Z.P. (1972), "Prediction of creep effects using age-adjusted effective modulus method", ACI J., 69, 212.
  3. Bojidar, Y. (2015), "Joints: The weak link in bridge structures and lifecycles", Wind Struct., 15(3), 543-553.
  4. Comite Euro-International du Beton (2008), CEB-FIP Model Code 1990, Thomas Telford Ltd.
  5. Council (1989), "Council directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work", Official J., L183, 0001-0008.
  6. Council (1992), "Council directive 92/57/EEC of 24 June on the implementation of minimum safety and health requirements at temporary or mobile construction sites", Official J., L245, 0006-0022 .
  7. Daebritz, M. and Lee, M. (2010), "Span by span movable scaffolding systems", IABSE WG 6, State of Art of Bridge Deck Erection, Safe and Efficient Use of Special Equipment, Singapore.
  8. Demmel, J.W., Gilbert, J.R. and Li, X.S. (1999), "An asynchronous parallel supernodal algorithm for sparse Gaussian elimination", SIAM J. Matrix Analys. Appl., 20(4), 915-952. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0895479897317685
  9. Diaz de Teran, J.R., Haach, V.G., Turmo, J. and Jorquera, J.J. (2016), "Improved construction of concrete viaducts with movable scaffoldinf systems in Spain", J. Bridge Eng., 04016050.
  10. Diaz de Teran, J.R. (2013), "New constructive procedure of viaducts with movable scaffolding system and new evolutive sequence", Ph.D. Dissertation, Universidad Politecnica de Cataluna, Barcelona.
  11. Diaz de Teran, J.R., Turmo, J., Jorquera, J., Barragan, B., Ramos, G. and Aparicio, A. (2013a), "Optimization of in situ construction of concrete decks: Flexure tests of compact splices of reinforcement between phases", Constr. Build. Mater., 41, 191-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.085
  12. Diaz de Teran, J.R., Turmo, J., Jorquera, J., Barragan, B., Ramos, G. and Aparicio, A. (2013b), "Shear-off strength of compact reinforcement for improved splicing site construction of concrete structures", Constr. Build. Mater., 47, 199-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.04.052
  13. Duff, I.S. and Reid, J.K. (1984), "The multifrontal solution of unsymmetric sets of linear equations", SIAM J. SCI Stat. Comput., 5(3), 633-641. https://doi.org/10.1137/0905045
  14. Fiore, A., Foti, D. and Monaco, P. (2013), "An approximate solution for the rheological behavior of nonhomogeneous structures changing the structural system during the construction process", Eng. Struct., 46, 631-642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.08.014
  15. Kasti, F.A. (1990), "Nonlinear material and time dependent analysis of segmentally erected reinforced and prestressed concrete composite 3D frame structures", Report No. UCB/SEMM 90-03, University of California, Berkeley, U.S.A.
  16. Kwak, H.G. and Son, J. (2006), "Determination of design moments in bridges constructed with a movable scaffolding system (MSS)", Comput. Struct., 84(31), 2141-2150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.08.044
  17. Kwak, H.G. and Seo, Y.J. (2000), "Long-term behavior of composite girder bridges", Comput. Struct., 74(5), 583-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(99)00064-4
  18. Kwak, H.G. and Seo, Y.J. (2002), "Numerical analysis of time-dependent behavior of pre-cast pre-stressed concrete girder bridges", Constr. Build. Mater., 16(1), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(01)00027-7
  19. Leonhardt, F. (1994), Brucken /Bridges, 4th edition, Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt.
  20. Liu, J.W.C. (1992), "The multifrontal method for sparse matrix solution: Theory and practice", SIAM Rev., 34(1), 82-109. https://doi.org/10.1137/1034004
  21. Ma, Y., Wang, Y., Su, Y. and Mei, S. (2016), "Influence of creep on dynamic behavior of concrete filled steel tube arch bridges", Steel Compos. Struct., 21(1), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.21.1.109
  22. Magura, D.D., Sozen, M.A. and Siess, C.P. (1964), "A study of stress relaxation in prestressing reinforcement", J. PCI, 9(2), 13-57. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.04011964.13.57
  23. Midas Civil (2011), "Civil 2011. On line manual", March 4, 2012.
  24. Ministerio de Fomento (1998), "Instruccion de Acciones en Puentes. Intruction of loads in bridges", Ministerio de Fomento, Madrid.
  25. Neville, A.M., Dilger, W.H. and Brooks, J.J. (1983), Creep of Plain and Structural Concrete, Const. Press, London.
  26. Pacheco, P., Coelho, H. and Borges, P. (2011), "Technical challenges of large movable scaffolding systems", Struct. Eng., 21(4), 450-455. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686611X13131377725640
  27. Pacheco, P., Fonseca, A., Resende, A. and Campos, R. (2009), "Sustainability processes in bridge construction process", Reviewed October 26, 2010, Springerlink: www.springerlink.com.
  28. Sadeghi, J. and Rezvani, F.H. (2013), "Development of non-destructive method of detecting steel bars corrosion in bridge decks", Struct. Eng. Mech., 46(5), 615-627. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.46.5.615
  29. Shin, D.H., Chung, C.H., Oh, C.H., Park, S.J., Kim, I.G., Kim, Y.J., Byun, T.K. and Kang, M.G. (2016), "Structural behavior of precast concrete deck with ribbed loop joints in a composite bridge", Smart Struct. Syst., 17(4), 559-576. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2016.17.4.559
  30. Siekierski, W. (2016), "Analysis of concrete shrinkage along truss bridge with steel-concrete composite deck", Steel Compos. Struct., 20(6), 1237-1257. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.20.6.1237
  31. Yang, M.G., Cai, C.S. and Chen, Y. (2015), "Creep performance of concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) columns and applications to a CFST arch bridge", Steel Compos. Struct., 19(1), 111-129. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2015.19.1.111
  32. Zwicky, D. (2013a), "Bond and ductility: A theoretical study on the impact of construction details-part 1: basic considerations", Adv. Concrete Const., 1(1), 103-119. https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2013.1.1.103
  33. Zwicky, D. (2013b), "Bond and ductility: A theoretical study on the impact of construction details-part 2: structure-specific features", Adv. Concrete Const., 1(2), 137-149. https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2013.1.2.137