과학교육연구지 (Journal of Science Education)

  • 제40권3호
  • /
  • Pages.267-286
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1225-3944(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-4074(eISSN)
경북대학교 과학교육연구소 (Science Education Research Institute Kyungpook National University)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

2010년부터 2015년까지 국내 과학영재교육의 연구동향 분석 : 문헌분석 대 사회네트워크분석

Research Trends in Science Gifted Education from 2011 to 2015: Literature Analysis vs Social Network Analysis

  • 투고 : 2016.10.13
  • 심사 : 2016.12.31
  • 발행 : 2016.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 2010년부터 2015년까지 6년간 과학영재교육의 연구동향을 분석하는데 목적을 두었다. 이를 위해 과학교육 및 영재교육 전문학술지 8종에 게재된 과학영재교육 관련 연구논문 총275편에 대해 문헌분석과 사회네트워크분석(Social Network Analysis: SNA)의 연구방법을 동시에 활용하여 연구동향을 분석하였다. 문헌분석에서는 분석틀로 연구주제, 연구대상, 연구방법의 분류범주를 설정하였으며, SNA방법에서는 논문별 제시된 영문 저자 키워드를 활용하여 연구동향을 분석하였다. 첫째, 문헌분석으로 분석한 결과, 연구주제는 인지적 특성(25.8%), 교육과정/프로그램(22.6%), 사회․정서적 특성(20.2%)의 연구가 많이 이루어지는 것으로 나타났으며, 연구방법에서는 조사연구(46.5%), 실험연구(18.8%), 프로그램 개발(10.6%), 상관연구(10.3%), 질적연구(6.4%)의 순으로 나타났다. 연구대상에서는 중학생 대상연구(33.7%)가 가장 많았고, 초등학생(30.6%), 고등학생(12.7%) 순으로 조사되었다. 둘째, SNA방법으로 분석한 결과, 과학영재교육 연구에서는 science gifted, gifted education, creativity의 3개 키워드를 중심으로 하는 네트워크가 형성되어 있었으며, 가장 빈번히 활용된 키워드는 science gifted, gifted education, gifted, creativity, science inquiry, perception, (creative) problem solving, science high school, scientific attitude, STEAM 으로 조사되었다. 셋째, 주제-키워드 이원모드(2-mode) 네트워크를 분석한 결과, 인지적 특성에 대한 연구는 인식, 사고양식, 과학적 논쟁, 과학탐구 등에 대한 연구가 많이 나타났다. 사회.정서적 특성에 대한 연구는 상관연구, 동기, 창의인성, 자기 효능감 등에 대한 연구가 주로 이루어지고 있는 것으로 나타났다. SNA방법은 연구내용을 구체적으로 분석, 제시함으로써 연구동향을 심층적으로 이해하고 해석할 수 있는 것으로 고찰되었다.

The study aimed to investigate a research trend in science gifted education of six years from 2010 to 2015 by utilizing literature analysis and Social Network Analysis (SNA) methods. In this study, 275 papers published in eight major academic journals of science education and gifted education were selected as research subjects. First, through the literature analysis, it was found that the most frequent research topics were cognitive characteristics (25.8%), curriculum/programs (22.6%), and social and emotional characteristics (20.2%). For the research method employed in research papers, the survey research (46.5%) was appeared as the most frequently employed method, and followed by experimental (18.8%), program development (10.6%), correlation (10.3%), and qualitative (6.4%) research methods. The most frequent research subject was appeared as middle school students (33.7%) and followed by elementary school (30.6%), and high school (12.7%) students. Second, the SNA method was utilized for producing keyword frequency, degree centrality and network analyses. It was appeared that the most common keywords over six years included 'science gifted', 'gifted education', and 'creativity' and frequent keywords were science gifted, gifted education, gifted, creativity, science inquiry, perception, (creative) problem solving, science high school, scientific attitude, and STEAM. Third, through 2-mode network analysis, it was found that the research papers about cognitive characteristics were mainly related to perceptions, thinking ability, scientific argumentation, science inquiry and so on. It was also found that the research papers about social and emotional characteristics were related to correlation, motivation, creativity-character, self-efficiency and so on. It was concluded that the SNA method can be performed with literature analysis together for better understandings and interpretations of the research trend of science gifted education in-depth.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. An, H. R., & Yoo, M. H. (2015). Analysis of research trends in STEAM education for the gifted. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 25(3), 401-420. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2015.25.3.401
  2. Doerfel, M. L., & Barnett, G. A. (1999). A semantic network analysis of the international communication association. Human Communication Research, 25(4), 589-603. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1999.tb00463.x
  3. Han, K. S., & Yang, T. Y. (2007). Current trends and future directions of research in the area of gifted education in Korea. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 17(2), 338-364.
  4. Hong, S. H., & Kim, S. W. (2000). An analytic study of science gifted/talented education program of USA by ERIC search. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 20(1), 112-136.
  5. Kang, K. H. (2010). The domestic research trend related to science education for the gifted. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 30(1), 54-67.
  6. Kho, J., Cho, K., & Cho, Y. (2013). A study on recent research trend in management of technology using keywords network analysis. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 19(2), 101-123. https://doi.org/10.13088/jiis.2013.19.2.101
  7. Kim, D. S., & Kwahk, K. Y. (2013). Investigating the global financial markets from a social network analysis perspective. Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, 38(4), 11-33. https://doi.org/10.7737/JKORMS.2013.38.4.011
  8. Kim, D. R., Kwon, K. S., & Jeong, S. B. (2015). Knowledge structure analysis on business administration research using keyword network analysis. The Korea Society of Decision Sciences, 23(1), 111-125.
  9. Korean Educational Development Institute [KEDI]. (2015). Statistical yearbook of gifted education. Statistics SM 2015-10. Seoul, Korea: Author.
  10. Kwon, S. Y. (2014). A study on the application to network analysis on the Importance of author keyword based on the position of keyword. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(2), 121-142. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.2.121
  11. Kwon, U. G., & Kim, Y. K. (2009). Researches of the science education for the gifted in Korea: from 1980 to 2008. Journal of Science Education for the Gifted, 1(2), 63-76.
  12. Lee, J., & Choi, S. H. (2014). Conceptions toward career development and occupational view between giftedness in computer science and normal students in elementary school. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 24(4), 613-628. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2014.24.4.613
  13. Lee, S. H., & Choi, S. I. (2015). Comprehensive review of research publications on gifted education in Korea: 2003-2012. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 25(6), 881-904. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2015.25.6.881
  14. Lee, J. K., & Ha, M. (2012). Semantic network analysis of science gifted middle school students' understanding of fact, hypothesis, theory, law, and scientificness. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(5), 823-840. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.5.823
  15. Lee, S., & Jeong, B. K. (2015). Research trends in robotics, control, and automation based on 2011-2014 IEEE ICRA proceedings. Journal of the Korean Society for Precision Engineering, 32(5), 397-401.
  16. Lee, Y. J., Jhun. Y. S., Shin, Y. J., Hong, J. E., & Choi, J. H. (2008). Analysis of the tendency of researches on the education of gifted-in-science by searching with ERIC. Journal of the Society for the International Gifted in Science, 2(1), 45-52.
  17. Ministry of Education[MOE]. (2015). Science education master plan (2016-2020). Seoul, Korea: Author.
  18. Otte, E., & Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis: A powerful strategy also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28(6), 441-453. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555150202800601
  19. Park, K. B. (2012). Analysis of research trends on gifted education in Korea. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 22(4), 823-840. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2012.22.4.823
  20. Seo, H. A. (2004). Directions of science education for the gifted and scientific creativity. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 14(1), 65-89.
  21. Seo, I. S., & Ha, M. J. (2011). Recent government policy and academic research trend analysis: focusing on the network properties (2-mode SNA) analysis of the 2009-2010 data. Korean Society and Public Administration, 22(1), 179-207.
  22. Sim, G. C., So, G. H., Kim, H. S., & Jang, N. G. (2003). Preference of science gifted/talented and general students for study course and occupation. Biology Education, 31(4), 292-298.
  23. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  24. Woo, S. (2015). The evolution of the science education policy for the gifted, 1968-2012:The interaction of the policy of human resource in science and technology and education policy for the gifted. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 25(2), 279-298. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2015.25.2.279
  25. Yoon, J. A., Kim, S. J., & Seo, H. A., (2015). Investigating trends of gifted education in domestic and foreign countries through social network analysis from 2010 to 2015. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 26(2), 347-363. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2016.26.2.347
  26. Yun, K. M., & Yoo, S. H. (2011). A comparison of career patterns among the gifted in science, the gifted in human and social science and average middle school students by Holland career theory. Secondary Institute of Education, 59(4), 1001-1029. https://doi.org/10.25152/ser.2011.59.4.1001

피인용 문헌

  1. 국내의 생태복원기술 연구동향에 관한 사회네트워크분석 vol.21, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2018.21.3.67
  2. The History of the Korean Society of Biology Education and Research Trends of Biology Education in Korea vol.46, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2018.46.4.543
  3. A Study on the Research Trends of Fisheries Resources in Korea vol.33, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.13000/jfmse.2021.6.33.3.692