DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparison of Ultrasonic Doppler and Oscillometric Methods in Systemic Blood Pressure Measurement of Dogs

  • Gang, Ho-min (Research Institute of Natural Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Song, Joong-Hyun (Research Institute of Natural Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Cho, Kyu-Woan (Research Institute of Natural Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Jung, Dong-In (Research Institute of Natural Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University)
  • Received : 2016.07.12
  • Accepted : 2016.08.17
  • Published : 2016.12.30

Abstract

The present study compared two indirect blood pressure methods at thoracic limb, pelvic limb, and coccygeal sites. For measurement of blood pressure, 48 client-owned dogs in a clinical setting were used. When comparing the results obtained by doppler and oscillometric methods, there were significant differences in blood pressure of the thoracic and pelvic limbs. The Doppler machine produced significantly higher blood pressure value than oscillometry measured at thoracic and pelvic limbs. The difference in blood pressure between the two methods was not significant when measured in the tail. Comparison of blood pressure measured at three different sites by doppler, blood pressure measured at pelvic limb was higher than at thoracic limb and tail. In case of oscillometry, there were no significant differences between the three sites. The results of this study indicate that mechanical and positional differences were existed in blood pressure measurements at the canine thoracic limb, pelvic limb and tail.

Keywords

References

  1. Acierno MJ, Mary AL. Hypertension in renal disease: diagnosis and treatment. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 2005; 20: 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ctsap.2004.12.004
  2. Acierno MJ, Domingues ME, Ramos SJ, Shelby, AM, da Cunha AF. Comparison of directly measured arterial blood pressure at various anatomic locations in anesthetized dogs. Am J Vet Res 2015; 76: 266-271. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.76.3.266
  3. Atkins C, Bonagura J, Ettinger S, Fox P, Gordon S, Haggstrom J, Hamlin R, Keene B, Luis-Fuentes V, Stepien R. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of canine chronic valvular heart disease. J Vet Intern Med 2009; 23: 1142-1150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2009.0392.x
  4. Bodey AR, Michell AR, Bovee KC, Buranakurl C, Garg T. Comparison of direct and indirect (oscillometric) measurements of arterial blood pressure in conscious dogs. Res Vet Sci 1996; 61: 17-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-5288(96)90104-6
  5. Bosiack, AP, Mann FA, Dodam JR, Wagner-Mann CC, Branson KR. Comparison of ultrasonic doppler flow monitor, oscillometric, and direct arterial blood pressure measurements in ill dogs. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2010; 20: 207-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-4431.2010.00520.x
  6. Brown S, Atkins C, Bagley R. Guidelines for the identification, evaluation, and management of systemic hypertension in dogs and cats. J Vet Intern Med 2007; 21: 542-558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2007.tb03005.x
  7. Chalifoux A, Dallaire A, Blais D, Lariviere N, Pelletier N. Evaluation of the arterial blood pressure of dogs by two noninvasive methods. Can J Comp Med 1985; 49: 419-423.
  8. Chetboul V, Tissier R, Gouni V, de Almeida V, Lefebvre HP, Concordet D, Jamet N, Sampedrano CC, Serres F, Pouchelon JL. Comparison of doppler ultrasonography and highdefinition oscillometry for blood pressure measurements in healthy awake dogs. Am J Vet Res 2010; 71: 766-772. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.71.7.766
  9. Finco DR. Association of systemic hypertension with renal injury in dogs with induced renal failure. J Vet Intern Med 2004; 18: 289-294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2004.tb02547.x
  10. Garofalo NA, Teixeira FJ, Neto RK, de Oliveira FA, Pignaton W, Pinheiro RT. Agreement between direct, oscillometric and doppler ultrasound blood pressures using three different cuff positions in anesthetized dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg 2012; 39: 324-334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2012.00711.x
  11. Gouni V, Tissier R, Misbach C, Balouka D, Bueno H, Pouchelon JL, Lefebvre H P, Chetboul V. Influence of the observer's level of experience on systolic and diastolic arterial blood pressure measurements using doppler ultrasonography in healthy conscious cats. J Feline Med Surg 2015; 17: 94-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X14532087
  12. Hsiang TY, Lien YH, Huang HP. Indirect measurement of systemic blood pressure in conscious dogs in a clinical setting. J Vet Med Sci 2008; 70: 449-453. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.70.449
  13. Jepson RE, Hartley V, Mendl, Caney SM, Gould DJ. A comparison of cat doppler and oscillometric memoprint machines for non-invasive blood pressure measurement in conscious cats. J Feline Med Surg 2005; 7: 147-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfms.2004.08.003
  14. Mishina M, Watanabe T. Development of hypertension and effects of benazepril hydrochloride in a canine remnant kidney model of chronic renal failure. J Vet Med Sci 2008; 70: 455-460. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.70.455
  15. Mishina M, Watanabe T, Fujii K, Maeda H, Wakao Y, Takahashi M. A clinical evaluation of blood pressure through non-invasive measurement using the oscillometric procedure in conscious dogs. J Vet Med Sci 1997; 59: 989-993. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.59.989
  16. Moore C, Dobson A, Kinagi M, Dillon B. Comparison of blood pressure measured at the arm, ankle and calf. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 1327-1331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05633.x
  17. Petric AD, Petra Z, Jemeja S, Alenka S. Comparison of high definition oscillometric and doppler ultrasonic devices for measuring blood pressure in anaesthetised cats. J Feline Med Surg 2010; 12: 731-737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfms.2010.04.007
  18. Rysnik MK, Cripps P, Iff I. 2013. A clinical comparison between a non-invasive blood pressure monitor using high definition oscillometry (memodiagnostic md 15/90 pro) and invasive arterial blood pressure measurement in anaesthetized dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg 2013; 40: 503-511. https://doi.org/10.1111/vaa.12035
  19. Seliskar AP, Zrimsek J, Petric AD. Comparison of high definition oscillometric and doppler ultrasound devices with invasive blood pressure in anaesthetized dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg 2013; 40: 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2012.00774.x
  20. Stepien RL, Rapoport GS, Henik RA, Wenholz L, Thomas CB. Comparative diagnostic test characteristics of oscillometric and doppler ultrasonographic methods in the detection of systolic hypertension in dogs. J Vet Intern Med 2003; 17: 65-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2003.tb01325.x
  21. Tranquilli WJ, Thurmon JC, Grimm KA. Monitoring anesthetized patients. In: Lumb & Jones' Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia, 4th ed. Blackwell Publishing: Haskins SC. 2007: 533-558.
  22. Wehner A, Hartmann K, Hirschberger J. Associations between proteinuria, systemic hypertension and glomerular filtration rate in dogs with renal and non-renal diseases. Vet Rec 2008; 162: 141-147. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.162.5.141