References
- 강명희 (2010). 양변 연산식에서 문제풀이전략 유형과 학생들의 등호개념 발달 연구: 정답반응은 등호의 관계적 개념을 뜻하는가?. 학습자중심교과교육연구 10(2), 15-33.(Kang, M.H. (2010). Analysis of children's two sides of equivalence problems solving strategies and development of the concept of equality: does a correct response imply the relational concept of equal sign?. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction 10(2). 15-33.)
- 강명희 (2011). 비표준 구조 연산식 정답반응 분석을 통한 초등학생들의 등호개념 이해 연구. 열린교육실행연구 14, 17-30.(Kang, M.H. (2011). Study of elementary school students' concept of equal sign through the analysis of their correct responses to nonstandard structure of equivalent equation problems. Open Education 14, 17-30.)
- 교육부 (2015). 수학 1-1. 서울: (주)천재교육.(Ministry of Education (2015). Korean national elementary mathematics 1-1. Seoul: Chunjae Education.)
- 교육부 (2015). 수학 6-2. 서울: (주)천재교육.(Ministry of Education (2015). Korean national elementary mathematics 6-2. Seoul: Chunjae Education.)
- 기정순, 정영옥 (2008). 등호 문맥에 따른 초등학생의 등호 개념 이해와 지도 방법 연구. 학교수학 10(4), 537-555.(Ki, J.S. & Chong, Y.O. (2008). The analysis of elementary school students' understanding of the concept of equality sign in contexts and the effects of its teaching methods. School Mathematics 10(4), 537-555.)
- 방정숙, 최지영 (2011). 범자연수와 연산에 관한 수학 교과서 분석: 일반화된 산술로서의 대수 관점을 중심으로. 수학교육 50(1), 41-59.(Pang, J.S. & Choi, J.Y. (2011). An analysis of the whole numbers and their operations in mathematics textbooks: focused on algebra as generalized arithmetic. The Mathematical Education 50(1). 41-59.)
- 지은림, 채선희 (2000). Rasch 모형의 이론과 실제. 서울: 교육과학사.(Ji, E.L. & Chae, S.H. (2000). Applying the rasch model. Seoul: Kyoyookbook.)
- 하수현, 이광호 (2011). 초등학교 6학년 학생들의 변수개념 이해에 관한 사례 연구. 수학교육 50(2), 213-231.(Ha, S.H, & Lee, G.H. (2011). Case study on the 6th graders' understanding of concepts of variable. The Mathematical Education 50(2). 213-231.)
- Blanton, M., Brizuela, B. M., Gardiner, A. M., Sawrey, K., & Newman-Owens, A. (2015). A learning trajectory in 6-year-olds' thinking about generalizing functional relationships. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 46(5), 511-558. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.5.0511
- Blanton, M., Levi, L., Crites, T., & Dougherty, B. J. (2011). Developing essential understanding of algebraic thinking in grades 3-5. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- Blanton, M., Stephens, A., Knuth, E., Gardiner, A. M., Isler, I., & Kim, J. S. (2015). The development of children's algebraic thinking: The impact of a comprehensive early algebra intervention in third grade. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 46(1), 39-87. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.1.0039
- Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
- Brizuela, B. M., Blanton, M., Sawrey, K., Newman-Owens, A., & Gardiner, A. M. (2015). Children's use of variables and variable notation to represent their algebraic ideas. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 17, 34-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2015.981939
- Byrd, C. E., McNeil, N. M., Chesney, D. L., & Matthews, P. G. (2015). A specific misconception of the equal sign acts as a barrier to children's learning of early algebra. Learning and Individual Differences 38, 61-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.01.001
- Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., & Levi, L. (2003). Thinking mathematically: Integrating arithmetic and algebra in the elementary school. Port smouth, NH: Heinemann.
- Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., Berman P., & Pligge, M. (2005). Developing algebraic reasoning in the elementary school. In T. Romberg, T. Carpenter, & F. Dremock (Eds.), Understanding mathematics and science matters (pp.81-98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Kieran, C. (1981). Concepts associated with the equality symbol. Educational Studies in Mathematics 12(3), 317-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311062
- Li, X, Ding, M, Capraro, M. M, & Capraro, R. M. (2008). Sources of differences in children's understandings of mathematical equality: comparative analysis of teacher guides and student texts in China and United States. Cognition and Instruction 26(2), 195-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000801980845
- Matthews, P., Rittle-Johnson, B., McEldoon, K., & Taylor, R. (2012). Measure for measure: What combining diverse measures reveals about children's understanding of the equal sign as an indicator of mathematical equality. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 43(3), 316-350. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.3.0316
- McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2005). Why don't you change your mind? Knowledge of operational patterns hinders learning and performance on equations. Child Development 76, 883-899. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00884.x
- McNeil, N. M., Fyfe, E. R., & Dunwiddie, A. E. (2015). Arithmetic practice can be modified to promote understanding of mathematical equivalence. Journal of Educational Psychology 107(2), 423. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037687
- Molina, M. & Ambrose, R. (2008). From an operational to a relational conception of the equal sign: Third graders' developing algebraic thinking. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics 30(1), 61-80.
- Powell, S. R., & Fuchs, L. S. (2010). Contribution of equal-sign instruction beyond word-problem tutoring for third-grade students with mathematics difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology 102, 381-394. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018447
- Rittle-Johnson, B. (2006). Promoting transfer: Effects of self-explanation and direct instruction. Child Development 77, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00852.x
- Stephens, A. C., Knuth, E. J., Blanton, M. L., Isler, I., Gardiner, A. M., & Marum, T. (2013). Equation structure and the meaning of the equal sign: The impact of task selection in eliciting elementary students' understandings. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior 32(2), 173-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.02.001