Korean Management Science Review (경영과학)

The Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society (한국경영과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emission and Abatement Potential for the Korean Waste Sector

한국의 폐기물부문의 온실가스 배출량 및 감축잠재량 분석

  • Chung, Yongjoo (Department of e-Business, Busan University of Foreign Studies) ;
  • Kim, Hugon (Department of Management, Kyungsung University)
  • 정용주 (부산외국어대학교 e-비즈니스학과) ;
  • 김후곤 (경성대학교 경영학과)
  • Received : 2016.10.19
  • Accepted : 2016.12.08
  • Published : 2016.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Waste sector has been a target of abatement policies by the most governments, even though its greenhouse gas (GHG) emission is not so high, since it is related to almost of other sectors. This study propose new GHG calculation equations which resolves logical contradiction of IPCC GL (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Guideline) equations by including waste-to-energy effects. According to two GHG calculation equations, GHG emission inventory and BAU by the year 2050 have been computed. And GHG abatement potential and marginal cost for the five abatement policies carefully selected from the previous researches have been calculated for the year 2020. The policy that makes solid fuel like RDF from flammable wastes and uses them as combustion fuel of electricity generations has been found to be the most efficient and effective one among five policies. The cumulative abatement amount when five policies not mutually exclusive are applied sequentially has been reckoned.

Keywords

References

  1. 관계부처 합동, 국가온실가스 감축 달성을 위한 로드맵, 2014.
  2. 기후변화대책기획단, 기후변화대응 종합기본계획, 2008.
  3. 김희찬, "생활폐기물 소각시설의 에너지회수효율개선에 관한 연구", 충남대학교 박사학위논문, 2013.
  4. 산업이슈(산은경제연구소), 폐기물 에너지화 동향과 대응방안, 2009.
  5. 에너지경제연구원, 기후변화협약대응 IPCC 신규 가이드라인 적용을 위한 기획연구, 2008.
  6. 온실가스종합정보센터(www.gir.go.kr).
  7. 온실가스종합정보센터, 2014 국가 온실가스 인벤토리 보고서, 2014.
  8. 한국기계연구원, 국내 가동 RDF 제조시설의 기술 및 운영 현황, 2012.
  9. 한국대기환경학회, 환경부문의 온실가스 저감 잠재력 평가, 2000.
  10. 한국산업관계연구원, 생활폐기물 처리시설 설치.운영비용 조사연구, 2007.
  11. 한국폐기물협회(www.kwaste.or.kr).
  12. 한국환경공단, 지자체 온실가스 배출량 산정 지침, 2012.
  13. 한국환경공단, 폐기물부문 배출시설별 온실가스 감축가이드라인, 2012.
  14. 한국환경공단, 폐기물부문 온실가스 배출량 및 에너지 소비량 산정 Tool, 2010.
  15. 한국환경공단, 폐기물부문 온실가스 배출전망 및 감축잠재량 산정, 2011.
  16. 한국환경공단, Waste-to-Energy Report, 2008.
  17. 한국환경정책평가연구원, 온실가스감축을 위한 폐기물 관리방안 연구, 2010.
  18. 환경부(www.me.go.kr, www.ieco.or.kr).
  19. 환경부, 폐기물 에너지화 종합대책, 2008.
  20. Cosmi, C., V. Cuomo, M. Macchiato, L. Mangiamele, S. Masi, and M. Salvia, "Waste management modeling by MARKAL model: A case study for Basilicata Region," Environmental Modeling and Research, Vol.5, No.1(2000), pp.19-27.
  21. EPA, Solid Waste Management and Greenhouse Gases : A Life-Cycle Assessment of Emissions and Sinks, 2006.
  22. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Waste Treatments Industries, 2006.
  23. Gielen, D.J., "The MARKAL systems engineering model for waste management," Working Paper, 1988.
  24. IAEA, MESSAGE User Manual, 2008.
  25. Ioannis, B., M. Sieck, T. Hermann, F.M. Andersen, and H. Larsen, "Projections of Municipal Waste Management and Greenhouse Gases," Working Paper, 2011.
  26. IPCC 2006 Guideline.
  27. IPCC Good Practice, 2000.
  28. Salvia, M., C. Cosmi, M. Macchiato, and L. Mangiamele, "Waste management system optimization for Southern Italy with MARKAL model," Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol.34, No.2(2002), pp. 91-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(01)00095-7
  29. Wei, Y.M., G. Wu, and Y.F.-C. Liu, "Progress in energy complex system modelling and analysis," International Journal of Global Energy Issues, Vol.25, No.1/2(2006), pp.109-128. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGEI.2006.008387

Cited by

  1. Review of the Status and Treatment Method of Organic Waste in Korea vol.9, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.18178/ijesd.2018.9.4.1081