DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Selecting Personal Protective Equipment for Listed Hazardous Chemicals (2): Analysis Using an Exposure Risk Matrix

사고대비물질 개인보호구 선정에 관한 연구(2): 노출위해성 매트릭스에 의한 분석

  • Han, Don-Hee (Department of Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, Inje University) ;
  • Chung, Sang-Tae (Department of Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, Inje University) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Il (Department of Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, Inje University) ;
  • Cho, Yong-Sung (Research Development and Education Division, National Institute for Chemical Safety) ;
  • Lee, Chung-Soo (Research Development and Education Division, National Institute for Chemical Safety)
  • 한돈희 (인제대학교 보건안전공학과) ;
  • 정상태 (인제대학교 보건안전공학과) ;
  • 김종일 (인제대학교 보건안전공학과) ;
  • 조용성 (화학물질안전원 연구개발교육과) ;
  • 이청수 (화학물질안전원 연구개발교육과)
  • Received : 2016.10.31
  • Accepted : 2016.12.19
  • Published : 2016.12.30

Abstract

Objectives: The new Chemical Control Act from the Korean Ministry of Environment (2014-259) simply states only in basic phrases that every worker handling the listed chemicals should wear personal protective equipment (PPE) and does not consider the different hazard characteristics of particular chemicals or work types. The purpose of this study was to produce an exposure risk matrix and assign PPE to the categories of this matrix, which would be useful for revising the act to suggest PPE to suit work types or situations. Methods: An exposure risk matrix was made using hazard ranks of chemicals and workplace exposure risks in the previous study. For the 20 categories of exposure risk matrix PPE, levels A, B, C, D as classified by OSHA/EPA were assigned. After 69 hazardous chemicals were divided into 11 groups according to their physiochemical characteristics, respirators, chemical protective clothing (CPC), gloves and footwear were suggested on the basis of the assigned PPE levels. Results: PPE table sheets for the 11 groups were made on the basis of work types or situations. Full facepiece or half-mask for level C was recommended in accordance with the exposure risk matrix. Level A was, in particular, recommended for loading or unloading work. Level A PPE should be worn in an emergency involving hydrogen fluoride because of the number of recent related accidents in Korea. Conclusion: PPE assignment according to the exposure risk matrix made by chemical hazards and work type or situation was suggested for the first time. Each type of PPE was recommended for the grouped chemicals. The research will be usefully used for the revision of the Chemical Control Act in Korea.

Keywords

References

  1. National Institute of Chemical Safety. Chemistry Safety Cleaning-house. Available: http://csc.me.go.kr/statis/occTypeStatisPList.do [accessed 16 August 2016].
  2. Ministry of Environment (ME). Regulation of personal protective equipments (PPE) for workers handling hazardous chemicals, ME Notice 2014-259. 2014.
  3. Han D-H, Chung S-T, Kim J-I, Cho Y-S, Lee C-S. A Study on Selecting Personal Protective Equipment for the Listed Hazardous Chemicals (1): Analysis of Hazard Ranks and Workplace Exposure Risks. J Environ Health Sci. 2016: 42(6): 419-429.
  4. Paik SY, Zalk DM, Swuste P. Application of a pilot control banding tool for risk level assessment and control of nanoparticle exposures. Ann Occup Hyg. 2008; 52(6): 419-428. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/men041
  5. Hashimoto H, Goto T, Nakachi N, Suzuki H, Takebayashi T, Kajiki S, Mori K. Evaluation of the control banding method -Comparison with measurement-based comprehensive risk assessment. J Occup Health. 2007; 49; 482-492. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.49.482
  6. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). 29 CFR 1910.120 Appendix B-General description and discussion of the levels of protection and protective gear. Available: https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=STANDARDS&p_id=9767, [accessed 29 October 2016].
  7. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Personal protective equipment. Available: https://www.epa.gov/emergency-response/personal-protective-equipment,[accessed 29 October 2016].
  8. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Guidance on Emergency Responder Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for Response to CBRN Terrorism Incidents. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2008-132/pdfs/2008-132.pdf, [accessed 29 October 2016].
  9. Ministry of Employment and Labor (MoEL). Regulation of approval for personal protective equipments (PPE). MoEL Notice 2014-46. 2014.