DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

도시생물다양성 지수(CBI) 중 생태네트워크 산정을 위한 도시생태현황지도 및 토지피복지도 활용 가능성 연구

A Study on the Possibility of Utilizing Both Biotope Maps and Land Cover Maps on the Calculation of the Ecological Network Indicator of City Biodiversity Index

  • Park, Seok-Cheol (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, University of Seoul) ;
  • Han, Bong-Ho (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, University of Seoul) ;
  • Park, Min-Jin (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, University of Seoul) ;
  • Yun, Hyerngdu (National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Kim, Myungjin (National Institute of Environmental Research)
  • 투고 : 2016.11.30
  • 심사 : 2016.12.06
  • 발행 : 2016.12.31

초록

본 연구는 도시생물다양성 지수(CBI) 중 생태네트워크(지표. 2)를 국내의 현실에 맞게 변형 적용한 연구로 도시생태 현황지도와 토지피복지도의 활용 가능성을 파악하고자 하였다. 계룡시 도시생태현황지도 생태네트워크를 산출한 결과는 13,713,703(33.8%)이었고, 토지피복지도로 산출한 결과는 17,686,966(37.9%)으로 토지피복지도의 결과치가 도시생태현황도 보다 높게 산출되었다. 고양시 도시생태현황지도 생태네트워크를 산출한 결과는 4,961,922(4.9%)이었고, 토지피복지도로 산출한 결과는 4,383,207(3.7%)로 토지피복지도의 결과치가 도시생태현황도 보다 낮게 산출되었다. 주요 연구결과로 생태네트워크 산출 시 군부대시설 유형은 도시생태현황지도에서는 특수지역, 토지피복지도에서는 시가화지역과 산림지역으로 구분되는 오류가 발견되었다. 또한 중분류 토지피복지도의 경우, 산림지역 주변은 토지이용이 세분되지 않았고, 개발지역이 산림녹지로 표현되는 오류가 발견되었다. 자연요소를 선정할 때에도 도시생태현황지도의 인공형하천, 인공연못, 인공초지 등의 유형은 제외가 필요하였고, 토지피복지도의 자연나지는 자연요소로 포함해서 산출할 필요가 있었다. 앞으로 전국 단위 생태네트워크는 토지피복지도를 활용하여 개략적으로 분석이 가능할 것으로 판단되었으며, 도시생태현황지도가 구축된 도시에서는 도시생태현황지도를 활용한 생태네트워크 산정이 더 정확한 현황 진단이 될 것으로 판단되었다.

This study modified and applied the ecological network(Indicator 2) from the City Biodiversity Index(CBI) to be tailored to Korea. It is calculated by utilizing a biotope map and a land cover map. The ecological network of Gyeryong-Si was 13,713,703(33.8%) with the biotope map and 17,686,966(37.9%) with the land cover map. The result of the biotope map was lower than the land cover map. The ecological network of Goyang-Si was 4,961,922(4.9%) with the biotope map and 4,383,207(3.7%) with the land cover map. The result of the land cover map was lower than the biotope map. As a main result of the research, an error was discovered in which, when calculating the ecological network, the types of the military unit facilities were distinguished into a special area on the biotope map and into an urbanization promotion area and a forest area on the land cover map. In the case of a middle-classified, land cover map, the land use in the surroundings of the forest area was not subdivided. An error in the development area expressed as a forest green was discovered. When selecting the natural elements, too, regarding the types of artificially-created rivers, artificial ponds, and artificial grasslands, etc. on a biotope map, the exclusions were necessary. Regarding the natural, bare ground on a land cover map, there was a need to calculate by including the natural elements. It was judged that, in the future, the ecological network in the unit of the entire nation can be analyzed roughly by utilizing a land cover map. It was judged that, in a city having a biotope map, the calculation of the ecological network utilizing a map of the present situation of the urban ecology will be a more accurate diagnosis of the present situation.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aey, E.(1990) Historical Approaches to Urban Ecology: Plants and Plant Communities in Urban Environment(ed. by H. Sukopp and S. Hejny) SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.
  2. Cha, Y. J.(2012) A review of 2010 environmental performance index: Validity and reliability of EPI model. Chung-ang Public Admistration Review 26(1): 35-56.
  3. EIU(2009) European Green City Index. Simens, 99p.
  4. EIU(2011) Asian Green City Index. Simens, 99p.
  5. Gyeonggi Research Institute(2011) A Comparative Study on the Urbanization Process between Korea and China. Gyeonggi Research Institute.
  6. Jaeger, J. and N. Nazarnia(2015) Methodology of Indicator 2 of the CBI.
  7. Kang, W and C. Park(2011) Quantitative analysis of Seoul green space network with the application of graph theory. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 25(3): 412-420.
  8. Kim, M. J.(2016) A Study on the Analyzing Method of Time-series Land Cover Change Detection. Thesis for the Degree of Master, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
  9. Lee, S., H. Lee and K. Lee(2005) Improvement of ecological plant structure and establishment of green network in case of Nowon-gu Seoul. Korea Planners Association 40(2): 145-169.
  10. Leser, H.(1991) Landschaftsokologie. UTB 521, Verlag Eugen Ulmen, Stuttgart, Germany.
  11. Liu, Xingguo and Yongmei Zhang(2008) An empirical analysis of ecological city evaluation index system. Proceedings of 2008 Conference on Regional Economy and Sustainable Development 111-116.
  12. Ministry of Environment(2002) Construction of Land Cover Map using Satellite Image Data. Ministry of Environment.
  13. Park, E.(2009) A Study on the Composition Plan of an Ecological Urban Park to Apply Green Network: A Case Study on Dongjak-gu, Seoul. Master's Thesis, Sookmyung Women's University. Korea.
  14. Sherbinin, A., A. Reuben, M. A. Kevy and L. Johnson(2013) Indicators in Practice: How Environmental Indicators are Being Used in Policy and Management Contexts. Yale university, 38p.
  15. SIEMENS(2011) Sustainable Urban Infrastructure. SIEMENS, 22p.
  16. Sukopp, H.(1990) Urban ecology and its application in Europe. Urban Ecology: Plants and Plant Communities in Urban Environments. The Hague(The Netherlands): SPB Academic Publishers.
  17. Sung, H., M. Kim, S. Hwang and S. Kim(2014) A basic study on connectivity of urban parks for the urban ecological network establishment. Journal of The Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 17(2): 125-136. https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2014.17.2.125
  18. Yun, H. D., J. Y. Park, T. B. Choi, I. T. Choi, T. W. Noh, B. H. Han and M. J. Kim(2015) A review on applicability of sustainable city index -Focusing on GCI, EPI and CBI-. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 24(6): 593-606. https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2015.24.6.593
  19. CBD Secretariat(2012) http://www.cbd.int
  20. CBD Secretariat(2014) http://www.cbd.int
  21. projectzero(2014) http://www.projectzero.dk