한국항해항만학회지 (Journal of Navigation and Port Research)

  • 제40권6호
  • /
  • Pages.401-412
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1598-5725(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-8470(eISSN)
한국항해항만학회 (Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

지속가능한 항만운영을 위한 효율적 항만환경관리에 관한 연구 (I): 부산 신항만 개발로 인한 해양환경 및 자원 영향성 평가 사례

Study on Efficient Port Environmental Management for Sustainable Port Operation (I): Case Study of Marine Environments and Natural Resources Impacts by Busan New Port Development

  • 김태균 (한국해양대학교 해사수송과학부)
  • Kim, Tae-Goun (Division of Maritime Transportation Science, Korea Maritime and Ocean University)
  • 투고 : 2016.12.12
  • 심사 : 2016.12.16
  • 발행 : 2016.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

국가물류경제의 중축산업인 항만의 지속가능한 운영과 개발을 위해서는 인프라 확충을 통한 경쟁력확보와 더불어 대기오염, 수질오염, 소음 및 생태계 파괴 등의 항만환경문제로 인한 지역커뮤니티와의 갈등해소가 더 중요한 요소로 부각되고 있다. 우리나라 부산 신항만 개발사업의 경우도 신항만 공사용 바다모래 채취로 인한 어민들과의 갈등 때문에 항만공사가 중단된 경험이 있으며, 그 주요 원인으로 현행 어업피해조사제도를 포함한 항만환경피해에 대한 정량적인 영향성 평가법의 부재와 한계라 할 수 있다. 따라서 본 연구의 주목적은 우리나라 항만의 지속가능한 항만운영 및 개발을 위한 효율적인 항만환경관리에 필수적인 정량적 환경영향성평가 방안의 제시에 있다. 이를 위해 국내외 항만의 환경정책과 사례분석을 통해 전반적인 항만환경문제와 그 영향(피해)에 대해서 살펴보고, 피해를 입은 환경재와 서비스의 전체적 경제적 가치를 평가할 수 있는 경제적 가치평가법을 제시하였다. 제시된 방법론 중에서 부산 신항만 개발로 따른 정박지 지정으로 인한 해양생태계 서비스 피해 사례에 대해 보다 과학적으로 추정할 수 있는 Habitat Equivalency Analysis(HEA)를 적용하여, 예시적인 피해액을 추정하였다. 본 연구의 결과를 토대로, 제시된 항만환경피해에 대한 경제적 영향성평가방법론의 제도적 도입을 통하여 보다 효율적인 항만환경관리방안을 제시하였다.

The sustainable operation and development of ports is a key industry for Korea's national economy. It is increasingly more important to resolve conflicts with local communities due to port environmental problems such as air pollution, water pollution, noise and ecosystem destruction while securing port competitiveness through infrastructure expansion. In case of the Busan New Port development project in Korea, construction has been temporally suspended due to conflict with local fishermen over marine sand mining for construction. A primary reason for this is the absence and limitation of qualitative port environmental impact assessment methodologies in Korea. This includes the current investigation of fisheries damaged by ports. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to propose economic valuation methods for assessing environmental impacts that are essential for efficient port environmental management and for sustainable port operation and development in Korea. To do this, this study examines the overall port environmental problems and their effects (damages) through the analysis of environmental policies and case studies of domestic and overseas ports. Then economic valuation methods are suggested for total economic values (TEV) of damaged environmental goods and services. Among the proposed methods, Habitat Equivalency Analysis (HEA), as a more scientific data based method, was applied to estimate marine ecosystem service damages from the designation of Busan New Port Anchorages. Finally, based on the study results, more efficient port environmental management will be achieved through the institutional adoption of the proposed economic impact assessment methods for port environmental damages.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Barbier, E. B., Acreman, M., and Knowler, D(1997), Economic valuation of wetlands: a guide for policy makers and planners. Gland: Ramsar Convention Bureau.
  2. Barbier, E. B(2011), "Coastal wetland restoration and the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill." Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol.. 64, No. 4, pp. 1820-1849.
  3. BPA(Busan Port Authority), Development Plan of Busan New Port, www.busanpa.com.
  4. BPA(2015), A Study on efficient Management Plan Busan Southern-outer Anchorage and North Port Mooring Facility, Busan Port Authority.
  5. Champ, P. A., Boyle, K. J., & Brown, T. C. (Eds.)(2012), A primer on nonmarket valuation, Vol.. 3, Springer Science & Business Media.
  6. Choi, J. D(2013), "A Study on the Economic Effectiveness of the Artificial Fish Reef Project in the Tae-an Marine Ranching." The Journal of Fisheries Business Administration, Vol.. 44, No. 3, pp. 103-109. https://doi.org/10.12939/FBA.2013.44.3.103
  7. ESPO (European Sea Ports Organisation)(2013), ESPO Port Performance Dashboard, ESPO, www.espo.be.
  8. KMI(Korea Maritime Institute)(2004), Environmental Issues in Container Port Development, KMI, p. 138.
  9. Freeman III, A. M(2003), The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values, second ed. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
  10. GHD(2013), Environmental best practice port development: an analysis of international approaches, GHD, www,ghd,com.
  11. Grigalunas, T., Opaluch, J., Luo, M., & Chang, Y. T(2001), "Estimating environmental costs in port development: case study of economic costs to fisheries of marine disposal of clean dredge sediments", Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board(1756), pp. 94-99.
  12. Gwon, G. H(2008, October 13), "Busan and Tonyoung Offshore Marine Sand War", The Chosun Ilbo, Retrieved from http://www.geojenews.com.
  13. Gwak, G. S., S. H. Moon, B. I. Park, and I. H. Baek(2014), Management of Port Operation, Pakyoungsa, p. 419.
  14. Hampton, S. and Zafonte, M(2002), "Calculating compensatory restoration in natural resource damage assessments: recent experience in California." Proceedings of the California and the World Ocean, Vol. 2, pp. 833-844.
  15. HSDST(Hebei Spirit Damage Support Team)(2015), Data of Indemnification and Compensation Status of Hebei Spirit Oil Spill Accident, Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries.
  16. IOPC Fund(2012), Incident involving the IOPC Funds - 1992 Funds: Hebei Spirit, IOPC Fund 1992.
  17. IOPC Fund(2014), Example Claim Form; 2014 Edition, London: IOPC Fund(1992).
  18. Jeon, S. G(2015), "A study on the Problems and Remedies of the Fishery Compensation", Maritime Law Review, Vol.. 27, No. 2, pp. 227-255.
  19. KFAFPI(Korea Fisheries Association Fishery Policy Institute)(2009), A Study on Fisheries Sector's Response Evaluation and Improvement Measures of Hebei Spirit Oil Spill. Report No. 11-1541000-000383-01.
  20. KFRA (Korea Fisheries Resources Agency)(2015), Statistics of Artificial Reefs Projects(1971-2014). Korea Fisheries Resources Agency.
  21. Kim, C. G(2102, July 13), "Action for Survival rights if fishery damages for Busan New Port are not investigated well. The Geoje News", Retrieved from http://www.geojenews.com.
  22. Kim, Dae-Young, Jeong-Gon Ryu, and Jung-Sam Lee(2008), Study on Establishing the Evaluation System of the Stock Enhancement Program. Korea Maritime Institute.
  23. KDI(Korea Development Institute)(2008), A study on Modification and Complementation of General standard guidelines for pre-feasibility study (5th Ed.), KDI.
  24. Kim, S. H(2015), "Sustainable Port Competitiveness in International Port Operations", Journal of Korea Port Economic Association, Vol.31, No. 30, pp. 61-74.
  25. Kim, T. G. and Kim, H. S(2014), "Study on establishing Green Port Policy in Korea to meet Ports' Characteristics: Development of Ulsan Green Port Policy by using AHP", Journal of navigation and port research, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 549-559. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2014.38.5.549
  26. Kohler, K. E. and Dodge, R. E(2006), "Visual_HEA: Habitat Equivalency Analysis software to calculate compensatory restoration following natural resource injury." Proceedings of 10th International Coral Reef Symposium, pp. 1611-1616.
  27. Lam, J. S. L. and Notteboom, T(2014), "The Greening of Ports: A Comparison of Port Management Tools Used by Leading Ports in Asia and Europe", Transport Reviews, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 169-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2014.891162
  28. Lee, K. T. and Baek, I. H(2015), "The Analysis on the Determinations Factors of Container Port Competitiveness", Journal of fisheries and marine sciences education, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 265-272.
  29. MOF (Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries)(2013), A Study on System Improvement of Compensation for Fisheries Damages by Port, MOF.
  30. MOF(2016). "MOF established standards for investigation of fisheries damage by Port", Press Releases, MOF.
  31. NIS(National Index System), Road Traffic Congestion Cost, http://www.index.go.kr/.
  32. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration)(1995), Habitat Equivalency Analysis: An Overview. Washington, DC: NOAA Damage Assessment and Restoration Program, NOAA.
  33. OSPAR Commission(2009), Assessment of the impacts of shipping on the marine environment, OSPAR Commission, www.ospar.org.
  34. Pascual, U., Muradian, R., Brander, L., Gomez-Baggethun, E., Martin-Lopez, B., Verma, M., ... & Farley, J(2010), "The economics of valuing ecosystem services and biodiversity", TEEB-Ecological and Economic Foundation.
  35. Park, C. G(2007, August 02), "Geoje Fisheries Cooperation and Joint Fisheries Damages Committee submitted the Proposal for Anti-Marine sand extraction in EEZ to MOF", The Geoje Times, Retrieved from www.geojetimes.co.kr.
  36. Petrolia, D. R(2014), "What Have We Learned from the Deepwater Horizon Disaster? An Economist's Perspective." Journal of Ocean and Coastal Economics 2014(1).
  37. PNUOSI (Pukyong National University Ocean Science Institute)(2011). Final Report of Fisher Damages Assessment from Busa New Port Development: South Container 2-3 Phrase and Anchorage Designation", PNUOSI.
  38. Ray, G. L(2009), Application of Habitat Equivalency Analysis to USACE Projects, ERDC TN-EMRRP-EI-04.
  39. Salem, Marwa E. and D. Evan Mercer(2012), The Economic Value of Mangroves: A Meta-Analysis, Sustainability, Vol. 4, pp. 359-383. https://doi.org/10.3390/su4030359
  40. Scemama, P. and Levrel, H(2016), Using Habitat Equivalency Analysis to Assess the Cost Effectiveness of Restoration Outcomes in Four Institutional Contexts, Environmental Management Vol. 57 No. 1, pp. 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0598-6
  41. Shaw, W. D. and Wlodarz, M(2013), "Ecosystems, Ecological Restoration, and Economics: Does Habitat or Resource Equivalency Analysis Mean Other Economic Valuation Methods Are Not Needed?"Ambio, Vol. 42, pp. 628-643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-012-0351-9
  42. Song, Y. S., Nam, K. C., Yeon, J. H., Kim, J. E(2003). "An Empirical Study on Berth-Length Calculation of Container Terminal", Journal of navigation and port research, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 179-184. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2003.27.2.179
  43. UPA (Ulsan Port Authority)(2013), A Strategic Development of Green Port Policy of Ulsan Port, UPA, p. 395.
  44. Yoo, J. W., Hong, H. P., Hwang, J. Y., Lee, M. S., Lee, Y. W., Lee, C. S., and Hwang, S. D(2014), "A Study on the Ecological Indices for the Assessment of the Function and Maturity of Artificial Reefs." Journal of the Korean Society of Oceanography Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 8-34.
  45. Yoo, S. H(2016), "The Marina Harbor Development Project and Compensation for Fishery Loss", Ilkam Real Estate Law Review, Vol.13, pp. 139-172.