DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Considerations and Suggestions for Expressing of Seismic Capacity of Buildings

건축물 내진능력 표현에 관한 고찰 및 제언

  • Lee, Cheol Ho (Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Park, Ji-Hun (Division of Architecture and Urban Design, Incheon National University)
  • Received : 2016.11.07
  • Accepted : 2016.12.07
  • Published : 2016.12.30

Abstract

In this paper, some popular intensity measures of earthquakes including magnitude, MMI, and PGA as well as their empirical relationships are briefly reviewed since they have been widely used without prudence by mass media, the public, and even the government when asking or expressing the seismic capacity of buildings. The basic concept of current seismic design is also presented in order to facilitate relevant discussions. It is emphasized that expressing the building seismic capacity simplistically in terms of seismological quantities or terminologies like magnitude and MMI is inherently irrational, may be misleading the stakeholders, and should be avoided. Alternative expressions, more rational and consistent with current seismic design philosophy and practice, are recommended.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee CH. 2011 Great Earthquake in Eastern Japan and Direction of Seismic Design of Korea: Expression of Seismic Design Load Intensity. Special Workshop prepared by Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea; Construction Society Building, Seoul; (in Korean). c2011.
  2. Kanamori H. The energy release in great earthquakes. Journal of geophysical research. 1977;82(20):2981-2987. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB082i020p02981
  3. Kim DG. Structural Dynamics. Gumiseogwan; c2005.
  4. Bolt BA. Earthquakes: A Primer. W. H. Freeman and Co.; c1978.
  5. Richter CF. Elementary Seismology. W. H. Freeman and Co.; c1958.
  6. Ministry of Construction and Transportation. Seismic Code Research (II). c1997.
  7. Applied Technology Council. Tentative provisions for the development of seismic regulations for buildings. ATC-3-06 (NBS SP-510). U.S Government Printing Office. Washington, DC; c1978.
  8. Building Seismic Safety Council, NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures. Washington, D.C: BSSC; c1997.
  9. Jeong BI. A Study on the Historical Earthquakes in Koresa. Journal of Geological Society of Korea. 1981;17(4):257-268.
  10. Yang SJ, Jeon MS. Seismic hazard distribution of Korea (I). Korea Institute of Energy and Resources. Investigation and Research Report. 1981:209-230.
  11. Kim SG. On the distribution of peak ground acceleration. Magazine of Korean Society of Civil Engineergs. 1982;30(1):9-15.
  12. Kim JH, Yang SJ, Jeon MS, Jeong BH. Study on statistical distribution of seismic hazard and slight earthquake motion. Korea Institute of Energy and Resources. Investigation and Research Report. 1983:239-292.
  13. Ministry of Construction. Research on the earthquake-resistant structure and disaster-prevention standard of buildings. 1987.
  14. Gutenberg B, Richter CF. Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy, and acceleration (second paper). Bulletin of the seismological society of America. 1956;46(2):105-145.
  15. Trifunac MD, Brady AG. On the correlation of seismic intensity scales with the peaks of recorded strong ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1975;65(1):139-162.
  16. Ambraseys NN. Engineering Seismology and Earthquake Engineering: Notes on Engineering Seismology. Noordhoff International Publishing; c1974.
  17. NEMA. National Seismic Hazard Map. National Emergency Management Agency; c2013.
  18. Architectural Institute of Korea. Korean Building Code 2016. Architectural Institute of Korea; c2016.
  19. SEAOC Vision 2000 Committee. VISION 2000: Performance Based Seismic Engineering of Buildings. SEAOC; c1995.
  20. ASCE. Seismic Rehabilitation Standards Committee, et al. Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings. ASCE/SEI 41-06. Reston, VA; American Society of Civil Engineers; c2007.
  21. ASCE. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7-05. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers; c2005.
  22. ASCE. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings. ASCE standard ASCE/SEI 41-13. American Society of Civil Engineers. Reston, VA. c2013.
  23. Tall Buildings Initiative, Guidelines for performance-based seismic design of tall buildings. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center; c2010.
  24. LA TBSDC. An alternative procedure for seismic analysis and design of tall buildings located in the los angeles region. Los Angeles Tall Buildings Structural Design Council; c2015.
  25. U.S. Geological Survey [Internet]. Available from: https://www.usgs.gov/.
  26. KMA. Historical earthquake records in Korea (2-1904). Korea Meteorological Administration; c2012.
  27. Atkinson GM, Kaka SI. Relationships between felt intensity and instrumental ground motion in the central United States and California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 2007;97(2):497-510. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120060154