DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

'실천 중심 인성 발현 메커니즘' 구현을 위한 NABI 프로그램의 적용 사례

A Case Study on Application of the NABI Program to Realize the 'Practice Centered Mechanism of Manifesting Character'

  • 투고 : 2016.11.25
  • 심사 : 2016.12.21
  • 발행 : 2016.12.31

초록

오늘날 인성교육의 중요성이 높아짐에 따라 과학교육에서도 인성교육을 실시하고자 하는 노력이 계속되고 있다. 이에 이 연구에서는 NABI 프로그램 적용을 통해 이론적으로 개발된 '실천 중심의 인성발현 메커니즘'이 실제 과학교육에서 구현 가능한지 확인하였다. 이를 위해 학생 산출물과 수업 녹화 자료 등 다수의 질적 자료를 수집하였고 이를 '실천 중심의 인성 발현 메커니즘'의 단계인 '가치, 판단, 실행'의 과정으로 유목화한 뒤 그 의미를 해석하였다. 연구 결과, 학생들은 NABI 프로그램에서 대상을 선정하고 개별적 관계를 맺음으로써 '가치'를 형성해가는 모습을 보였다. 또한 학생들이 형성한 가치는 '관계맺음'의 대상에 따라 '개인적, 대인적, 사회적, 생태적, 영적 가치'가 나타났지만 자연을 대상으로 하는 NABI 프로그램의 특성 상 생태적 가치가 두드러진 모습을 보였다. 다음으로 학생들은 실제 상황에서 겪게 된 문제를 '판단'하는 모습을 보였는데 이 과정을 통해 학생들은 서로 타협하는 사회적 가치를 형성하고 실행하는 모습을 보이기도 했다. 마지막으로 '실행' 단계에서는 대상에 대한 공감을 바탕으로 '실천 의지'가 발휘될 때 진정한 '실행'이 이루어지는 것이다. 이를 통해 이론으로서의 '실천 중심의 인성 발현 메커니즘'은 과학교육에서 NABI 프로그램을 통해 구현될 수 있다는 사실을 확인하였다. 앞으로 NABI 프로그램은 과학교육을 통한 인성교육 실행에 구체적인 방안으로 활용 가능할 것이다.

Today, in accordance with emphasizing the importance of character education, science educators have tried to implement character education in the field of science education. Therefore, this research aims to confirm the possibility of the realization of 'Practice Centered Mechanism of Manifesting Character' developed on the basis of character education theory through the application of the NABI Program based on Nature-Study. For this, the NABI program was applied to 24 3rd grade students of an elementary school for a period of ten months. Qualitative data was collected like students' reports, journals, and video recording of the classes. This data was classified into 'value, judgment, action,' the steps of 'Practice Centered Mechanism of Manifesting Character,' and text was written by interpreting the data. The research resulted in the following: First, students formed 'value' by making a connection with the objects. And the various values - individual, interpersonal, social, ecological, and spiritual - are formed according to the type of objects with which the students felt a connection to. Second, students need to judge the problems of the real world at the 'judgment' step. Third, at the 'action' step, students practice moral behavior in relation to the sympathy or feeling they felt with the objects that they made a connection to. In conclusion, 'Practice Centered Mechanism of Manifesting Character' can be realized through the application of the NABI Program. The NABI Program can be a definite way to implement character education in the field of science education.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Armitage, K. C. (2009). The nature study movement: The forgotten popularizer of America's conservation ethic. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
  2. Bailey, L. H. (1903). The nature-study idea: Being an interpretation of the new school movement to put the child in sympathy with nature. New York: Doubleday, Page & Company.
  3. Berkowitz, M. W., & Simmons, P. E. (2003). Integrating science education and character education. In Zeidler, D. L. (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (Chap. 6. pp. 117-138). Dordrecht, Boston, New York and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  4. Chang, H., & Lee, H. (2010). College students' decision-making tendencies in the context of socioscientific issues(SSI). Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 30(7), 887-900.
  5. Character Education Promotion Act, No. 13004 (2015).
  6. Cho, M. (2015). A phenomenological study on group creativity experiences of elementary science-gifted students. Doctoral dissertation, Konkuk University.
  7. Cho, Y. (1999). Qualitative description, analysis, interpretation. The Journal of Anthropology of Education, 2(2), 27-63.
  8. Cho, Y., Kim, A., Im, H., Sin, D., Cho, A., & Kim, I. (1998). Component factors of desirable character education. Journal of educational studies, 28, 131-152.
  9. Choi, J., Park. C., Yeon, K., Min. Y., Lee. E., Jung, W., Seo, J., Cha, D., Hur, J., & Lim, C. (2009). The problem of character education and alternative approach in korea(creative character education). The Journal of creativity education, 9(2), 89-112.
  10. Doris, E. E. (2002). The practice of nature-study: What reformers imagined and what teachers did (Doctoral dissertation). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3055845).
  11. Eick, C. J. (2012). Use of the outdoor classroom and nature-study to support science and literacy learning: A narrative case study of a third-grade classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(7), 789-803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9236-1
  12. Gardner, H. (2002). Intelligence reframed. (Moon, Y. Tran.). Seoul: Gimmyoung. (original work published 1999).
  13. Greenawalt, C. E. (1996). Character education in America. Commonwealth Foundation for Public Policy Alternatives, Harrisburg, PA. ED398327.
  14. Hoffman, M. L. (1984). Interaction of affect and cognition on empathy. In Izard, C. E., Kagan, J., & Zajonc, R. B. (Eds.) Emotions, Cognition, and Behavior. UK: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Huh, S. (2016). The current problem and task of humanity education of elementary school. Journal of Learning Strategy Intervention, 7(1), 37-49.
  16. Jang, J., Mun, J., Ryu, H., Choi, K., Krajcik, J., & Kim, S. (2012). Korean middle school students' perceptions as global citizens of socioscientific issues. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(7), 1124-1138. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.7.1124
  17. Jeong, C., Chang, K., Lee, D., Song, S., & Woo, Y. (2016). Creating practical action plans for character education through student-teacher/studentstudent interactions. Journal of Ethics Education Studies, 40, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.18850/JEES.2016.40.01
  18. Johnson, K. (2013). The nature-study movement, Green Teacher, 99, 16-20.
  19. Kang, S., Park, E., Kim, G., Song, S., Chung, Y., Kim, Y., & Ko, M. (2008). A foundational study for the vision of education for the human nature for 21st century. The Journal of Research in Education, 30, 1-38.
  20. Kim, H., & Lim, H. (2014). Elementary science gifted students' perceptions of decision-making activities on socioscientific issues. The Journal of Education, 34(3), 237-252.
  21. Kim, J., Bang, M., Bae, S., Hong, Y., Choi, J., Lee, N., Seo, S., Bae, J., Lee, Y., Lee, H., & So, K. (2014). The effect of STEAM education program using movies on the creative personality, creative problem-solving ability and scientific attitude of elementary scientific gifted. Journal of Science Education, 38(1), 120-132. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2014.38.1.120
  22. Knapp, C. E., & Woodhouse, J. L. (2006). The nature study movement: A revolt to promote school reform. Thresholds in Education, 32(3), 20-25.
  23. Kohlstedt, S. G. (2010). Teaching children science: Hands-on nature study in north America, 1890-1930. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  24. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. (2011). A study on how to activate character education through subjects education and creative extra curricular activities (RRC 2011-7-1). Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
  25. Kwon, H., & Kim, C. (2007). Beginning earth science teachers' perceptions about learning in geologic field trip. The Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 28(1), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2007.28.1.014
  26. Lee, H., & Chang, H. (2011). Enlargement of Pre-service Science Teachers' Understanding of SSI Teaching through a Teacher Education Program. Journal of Research in Curriculum instruction, 15(4), 911-930.
  27. Lee, J., You, S., & Lee, Y. (2015). Exploring instructional methods for the integration of subject education and character education. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 26(3), 463-487.
  28. Lee, Y., & Kim, Y. (2012). The effects of the creative thinking and creative personality using the ‘Weather and our life' on science-based STEAM. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 5(2), 204-212.
  29. McComas, W. F. (2008). Back to the future? Science Teacher, 75(2), 24-28.
  30. Ministry of Education. (2014a). Policy research for the establishment of vision in character education. Seoul: Jinhan M&B.
  31. Ministry of Educational Science and Technology. (2011). Ethics Curriculum. Notification No. 2011-361 of the MEST. Seoul: Ministry of Educational Science and Technology
  32. Mueller, M. P., & Zeidler, D. L. (2010). Moral-ethical character and science education: Ecojustice ethics through socioscientific issues(SSI). In Tippins, D. J., Mueller, M. P., van Eijck, M., & Adams, J. D. (Eds). Cultural studies and environmentalism: The confluence of ecojustice, place-based (science) education, and indigenous knowledge systems (Chap. 8, pp. 105-128). Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer.
  33. Park, D. (2015). Historical analysis of Nature-Study and reinterpretation with modern perspectives : NABI (NAture-study Based Ideas) program as an implication. Doctoral dissertation, Kyungpook National University.
  34. Park, D., & Park, J. (2015a). Development and application of NABI(NAture-study Based Ideas) program for 'science education through nature'. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(6), 961-970. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.6.0961
  35. Park, D., & Park, J. (2016). Directions for character education in science education and a theoretical approach of Nature-Study in terms of character education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(4), 581-589. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.4.0581
  36. Park, J., & Park, S. (2014). The formation process of Nature-Study in U. S. and its implication for science education. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 58(1), 118-125. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2014.58.1.118
  37. Park, S. (2011). Development of humanity program based on ecological approach for adolescent. The Korea Journal of Youth Counseling, 19(1), 203-220.
  38. Park, S., & Huh, S. (2012). A study for development of the integrated humanity scale for adolescent. The Journal of Child Education, 21(3), 35-47.
  39. Park, S., & Park, J. (2015b). A study on educational methods of Nature-Study for science education through nature. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 59(1), 45-53. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2015.59.1.45
  40. Ryu, C., & Jin, H. (2006). Analysis of character virtue factors for character education. The Journal of Education, 26(1), 139-166.
  41. Kang, S., Park, E., Kim, G., Song, S., Chung, Y., Kim, Y., & Ko, M. (2008). A foundational study for the vision of education for the human nature for 21st century. The Journal of Research in Education, 30, 1-38.
  42. Scott, C. B. (1900). Nature study and the child. Boston: D. C. Heath.
  43. Seo, K., Choi, J., Noh. S., Kim, S., Lee, J., & Hyun S. (2013). The development and validation of teacher disposition assessment instruments. Journal of educational studies, 44(1), 147-176.
  44. Seo, Y. & Koh, M. (2013). A case study on character education applying project based learning. Korean Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(1), 49-77.
  45. Strauch-Nelson, W. (2012). Reuniting art and nature in the life of the child. Art Education, 65(3), 33-38.
  46. Wee, S., & Lim, S. (2013). Awareness and educational needs concerning SSI of Korean pre-service elementary teachers related to nuclear power plant accident. Journal of Science Education, 37(2), 294-309. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2013.37.2.294
  47. Zeidler, D. L., Berkowitz, M. W., & Bennett, K. (2014). Thinking (scientifically) responsibly the cultivation of character in a global science education community. In Mueller, M. P., Tippins, D. J., & Stewart, A. J. (Eds), Assessing schools for generation R(responsibility): a guide for legislation and school policy in science education. (Chaps 7. pp 83-99). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

피인용 문헌

  1. 과학관련 사회쟁점을 활용한 대학생 인성교육의 효과 -개인-집단중심성향에 따른 비교- vol.37, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.3.395