한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제36권6호
  • /
  • Pages.911-923
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

2009 개정 초등 과학과 성취기준에 대한 교사들의 이해와 활용

Teachers' Understanding and Application by Implementing 2009 Revised Curriculum Elementary Science Achievement Standards

  • 투고 : 2016.09.19
  • 심사 : 2016.11.10
  • 발행 : 2016.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

현재 2009 개정 과학교육과정을 시행하고 있는 현장의 초등 교사들을 대상으로 과학과 성취기준을 어떻게 이해하고 있으며 실제 수업에서 어떻게 활용하고 있는지를 분석하고, 시사점을 제시하였다. 이를 위해 12명의 교사를 심층 면담하여 질적 내용분석법에 따라 자료를 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 과학과 성취기준에 대한 교사의 이해와 활용은 '과학 수업과 평가의 통제적 역할을 하는 성취기준'으로의 이해와 '평가중심 활용에 무게'를 두고 성취기준을 활용하는 것으로 요약할 수 있었다. 구체적으로는 과학 수업의 이정표의 의미로 성취기준을 이해하고 있으나, 일상적인 과학 수업과 평가 상황에서는 크게 염두에 두지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 일반과 핵심으로 층위가 나뉜다고 이해하고, 핵심 성취기준에 대한 양과 수준의 정선 문제를 제기하였다. 한편 과학과 성취기준의 활용 측면에서는 학기 초 교육과정 업무 해결을 위하여 끼워 맞추기식 양상과 평가 활동을 위한 활용에 치우쳐 있음을 알 수 있었다. 이에 따른 결론은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 교사들의 성취기준에 대한 관심과 교육과정 전문성을 높여야 한다. 둘째, 교사가 쉽게 이해하고 활용할 수 있는 교육과정 문서를 개발하고 과학 성취기준을 정선해야 한다. 셋째, 교육과정 정책에 대한 홍보 및 정보제공, 행정적 재정적 지원 및 장학과 관련된 제도적 개선이 요구된다.

The purpose of this study is to figure out the quality of understanding and implementation for teachers implementing the 2009 revised elementary science curriculum achievement standards. To achieve this purpose, in-depth interviews were conducted with 12 participants, and the qualitative contents method was used to analyze interview contents. According to the interview contents, the results of this study can be described as a phenomenon that teachers implementing achievement standards regarded achievement standards as usual, while focusing on evaluation in school. To make clear of this phenomenon, we classified it into two main dimensions. One is the understanding of teachers by implementing the 2009 Revised National Curriculum achievement standards for elementary school science curriculum, the other is its application. Teachers regarded achievement standards as a criterion, but did not have much attention to it during class time. Furthermore, teachers point out the problems caused by lacking available support materials and the material about core achievement standards. When teachers implemented achievement standards, they prefer to give class to students based on textbooks rather than achievement standards, and they usually use it as evaluation criterion. Based on the results of this study, there were three suggestions and they are as follows: First, it is necessary to improve teachers' professionalism on curriculum and it is a must for teachers to have more concerns about achievement standards; Second, to develop accessible support materials for teachers; Third, to improve curriculum implementation systems.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ben-Peretz(2012). The teacher curriculum encounter: freeing teachers from the tyranny of text. Albany: State Universtiy of New York Press. (Jeong, K. S. & Kim, S. Y. Trans.) Seoul: KangHyeon Press. (original work published 1990)
  2. Bondan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (2015). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods(5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon. (Cho, J. S. Trans,). Seoul: KyoungMoon Press. (original work published 2007)
  3. Choi, J. I., Paik, S. H. (2015). A Comparative Analysis of Achievement Standards of the 2007 & 2009 Revised Elementary Science Curriculum with Next Generation Science Standards in US based on Bloom's Revised Taxonomy. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(2), 277-288. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.2.0277
  4. Chung, H. S. (2007). A Critical Review of Standards-based Curriculum for Korean Language. The Society of Korean Language Edcuation, 123, 183-212.
  5. Creswell. J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. Sage Publications, Inc.
  6. Creswell. J. W. (2012). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approach. (Cho, H. S., Jeong, S. O., Kim, J. S., & Kwon, J. S. Trans.). Seoul: Hakjisa. (original work published 2007)
  7. Forman, J. & Damschroder, L. (2008). Qualitative Content Analysis In Jacoby, L. & Siminoff, L. A. (2008). Empirical Methods for Bioethics: A Primer. CA: Elsevier Ltd.
  8. Gu, W. H. (2013). Exploring the Meaning of the Appropriateness of Curriculum Coverage and Depth based on the Analysis of Conflicting Issues. Journal of Learner- Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 13(20), 285-305.
  9. Hall, G., Hord, S. M. (2001). Implementing Change Patterns, Principles, and Potholes. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  10. Hall, G., Wallace, R. & Dossett, W. (1973). A developmental conceptualization of the adoption process within educational institutions (Report No. 3006). Austin: Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, University of Texas at Austin. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 095 126).
  11. Han, S. H. (2004). A Disscusion on Relevance of Educational contents: Issue and Direction. Korean Society for Curriculum Studies Spring Seasonal Seminar in 2004.
  12. Hong, H, J., Lee, S. M., Min, B. J., & Kim, Y. S. (2010). A Study on Alignment and Relevance of Subject Curriculum. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
  13. Hong, M. Y., Park, S. K., Baek, K. S. S., Byun, H. H., Yang, Y. J., Yang, J. S., Lee, K. E., Lee, M. K., & Han, H. C. (2012). Research and development of achievement standards and achievement levels based on the national curriculum revised in 2009- An analysis of the national curriculum and development achievement standards. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. CRC 2012-1.
  14. Jeong, Y. K., & Park, S. K. (2006). A Study on the Relevance(jukjunghwa) of Contents in National Curriculum. The Journal of Educational Idea, 19, 1-15.
  15. Jo, K, H. (2013). The Characteristics Verbs in Physics Achievement Standards in the 2009 Revised National Curriculum. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 17(4), 1405-1420. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2013.17.4.1405
  16. Jo, K. H. (2015). Comparison of Verbs in the Contents of the National Curriculum for Elementary and Middle School Science: Focused on the 7th, 2007, and 2009 Revision. Journal of Science Education, 39(2), 239-254. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2015.39.2.239
  17. Jo, S. Y. (2015). A study on the aspects of using achievement standards in national subject curriculum of elementary teachers. Journal of Learner- Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 15(8), 587-641.
  18. Kim, C. C. (1997). "Curriculum Differentiation on the Basis of Students' Academic Capability" Reconsidered. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 15(2), 19-50.
  19. Kim, C. C. (2003). A Comparative Study on the Reduction Discourses of Educational Content in the 4th to 7th National Curriculum R & D Reports. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21(2), 105-122.
  20. Kim, D. H. (2015). The Utilization and Prospects of Textbooks in Instruction and Evaluation in Korean Education. Journal of Educational Innovation Research, 25(3), 21-44.
  21. Kim, D. H., & Kim, H. N. (2014). Two Different Perspectives on Principal Autonomy. The Journal of Educational Research, 12(1), 71-97.
  22. Kim, E. J. (2015). Teachers' Understanding and Application to theme textbooks on 2009 revision of national elementary. Dissertation of Pusan National University.
  23. Kim, E. J., & Kim, D. H. (2014). Teachers' Understanding about Theme Textbooks on the Integrated Curriculum Revised in the 2009. Journal of Curriculum Integration, 8(3), 73-92.
  24. Kim, E. J., Kwon, Y. J., & Lee, Y. J. (2013). The Direction for Revising the Achievement Standards in Korean Home Economics Education: Focussing on the Comparison with the U.S. National Standards. Korean Home Economics Education Association, 21(5), 37-54.
  25. Kim, E. J., Yang, M. Y., & Kim, D. H. (2010). An Analysis on Elementary Teachers' Stages of Concern to Integrated Units of Revised National Elementary Integrated Curriculum in 2007. The Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education, 22(2), 287-302.
  26. Kim, J. S. (1999). A Comparative Study of the Curriculum-based Assessment Standards Development in Korea and Standards Movement in America. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17(2), 339-362.
  27. Kim, K. H. (2009). The Conceptual Confusion of Achievement Standards and Direction for Developing Achievement Standards and Evaluation Standards in Moral Education. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 12(3), 125-151.
  28. Kwak, Y. S. (2004). An Evaluative Study on the 7th National Elementary-school Science Curriculum Implementation. Elementary Sceience Education, 24(5), 1028-1038.
  29. Kwon, N. W., Park, S. R., & Chu, K. J. (2006). An inquiry into the meaning and the acquisition of teaching skills as a personal practical knowledge. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 23(3), 187-207.
  30. Lee, E. K. (2004). A study on the relevance of elementary English based on the 7th National Curriculum: Amount, level, and degree of interest. Primary English Education, 10(2), 55-95.
  31. Lee, E. S., & Choe, Y. J. (2004). Study on the Operational Status of the In-Depth and Supplementary Class of the 7th National Science Curriculum. Journal of the Korean association for science education, 24(2), 298-306.
  32. Lee, G. H., Lee, B. C., Lee, J. Y., & Kim, H. S. (2015). Research on the ways to improve the National Curriculum implementation system through international comparative studies. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. CRC 2015-6.
  33. Lee, K. E., Jang, G. J., & Park, J. H. (2012). Suggestions for Content and Improvement of Achievement Standards in Music Education. Korean Journal of Research in Music Education, 41(1), 113-135.
  34. Lee, M. G., Shim, J. H., Kim, D. Y., Gu, J. O., Kim, H. J., Choi, B. S., Kim, J. U., Min, G. N., Bae, Y. H., & Kim, Y. G.(2013). A Study on developing core standard achievement for elementary and middle school on 2009 revised curriculum. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. CRC 2013-9.
  35. Lee, M. J. (2014). Characteristics and Trends in the Classifications of Scientific Literacy Definitions. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(2), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.2.0055
  36. Lee, S. M., & Park, S. K. (2014). A Critical Review on the Achievement Standards in the Subject Curriculum. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 52(2), 53-79.
  37. Lee, Y. S., & Kim, S. S. (2014). The effects of learning strategies unit time based core achievement standard of science. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Sciences Education, 7(2), 169-179. https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2014.7.2.169
  38. Lee, Y. S., & Kim, H. Y. (2009). A comparative study of the achievement standards between the Revised Korean National Curriculum of English and Common European Framework of References(CEFR). Modern English Education, 10(2), 108-132.
  39. Leem, Y. W., & Kim, Y. S. (2013). A Historical Study on the Korean Science Curriculum for the Elementary and Secondary Schools. Biology Education, 41(3), 483-503. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2013.41.3.483
  40. Lim, Y. N., Cho, E. Y., & Hong, H. J. (2015). Analysis of the Demonstration Unit of Science Textbooks Developed according to Core Achievement Standards. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 15(6), 389-412.
  41. Lim, Y. N., & Jang, S. Y. (2015). A Study on the Reduction of Educational Contents in the 2015 Revised National Science Curriculum : Focusing on the Common Curriculum. Journal of Learner- Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 15(12), 437-460.
  42. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E.(1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  43. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossy-Bass.
  44. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology(2011). Advancing Measures for Academic Affairs of Middle School.
  45. Na, J. Y., & Song, J. W. (2015). Directions and Issues of 2015 National Science Curriculum and their Implications to Science Classroom Culture. School Science Journal, 9(2), 72-84.
  46. Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87, 224-240. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10066
  47. Ohn, J. D. (2014). Implications for Standards-based Curriculum in Korea Through the Comparative Analysis of Korean and the US Social Studies Curriculum Documents. The Journal of Elementary Education, 27(2), 53-72.
  48. Paik, N. J. (2007). A Comparative Study on the Form of Presentation of Educational Contents in the Subject Curriculum - With Focus on Korean and American Science Curriculum(Life Science) -. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25(1), 129-159. https://doi.org/10.15708/kscs.25.1.200703.006
  49. Paik, N. J. (2014). Review of statements of achievement standards in subject curriculum: Focusing on the national science curriculum of Republic of Korea and the U. S.. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(2), 101-131. https://doi.org/10.15708/kscs.32.2.201406.005
  50. Paik, N. J. (2015). A Review of Scientific Literacy-Based Science Standards: Focusing on Science Curriculum of Canada, Australia, and Singapore. Journal of Educational Studies, 46(2), 1-29.
  51. Park, J. K. (2014). Analysis for the Duplication of Achievement Standards between Science and Other Subjects in the 2009 Revised National Curriculum. Journal of Science Education, 38(2), 231-243. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2014.38.2.231
  52. Park, M. J. (2012). Teachers' narrative of implementing national curriculum. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30(3), 247-270. https://doi.org/10.15708/kscs.30.3.201209.011
  53. Schuman, D. (1982). Policy analysis, education, and everyday life. Lexington. MA: Health.
  54. Seo, Y. J. (2013). A Critical Review on Statement Form of Content Achievement Standards in the Korean Language Curriculum. Korean Language Education Research, 46, 415-450.
  55. Sung, Y. K. (2005). Trends and Evaluation of Curriculum Debates on Standards Movement in the US. The Korea educational review, 11(1), 215-235.
  56. Sung, Y. K., Baek, B. B., & Yun, S. T. (2008). Policy borrowing and transformation of curriculum standards: An analysis on the decision-making process. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26(3), 1-22.
  57. Yu, G. U., Chung, C. W., Kim, Y. S., & Kim, H. B. (2012). Qualitative research methods. Seoul: Pakyoung Press.
  58. Yun, H. J., Park, S. H., & Lee, K. H. (2008). Achievement Standards in the National Curriculum(RRC 2008-2). Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation.

피인용 문헌

  1. 네트워크 분석을 통한 국내 과학교육 질적 연구동향 분석 vol.10, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15523/jksese.2017.10.3.290
  2. Knowledge and coping behaviors towards particulate matter of mothers raising their children vol.37, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.14367/kjhep.2020.37.1.69
  3. 2015 개정 교육과정에서 초등과학과 교육과정 성취기준 분석 방법의 제안 -'지구와 우주' 영역을 중심으로- vol.40, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2020.40.2.163
  4. 백워드 설계 2.0을 활용한 '태양계와 별' 단원 수업이 과학 학업성취도와 수행평가 및 과학 수업 만족도에 미치는 효과 vol.13, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15523/jksese.2020.13.2.147