DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Glycine soja Supplementation on the Quality of Corn Silage

야생콩(Glycine soja)을 이용한 옥수수 사일리지의 품질향상

  • Yang, Bung-Mo (College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Heo, Jung-Min (College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Park, Kee Woong (College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Hyung-Suk (Woosong College) ;
  • Lee, Soo-Kee (College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University)
  • 양병모 (충남대학교 농업생명과학대학) ;
  • 허정민 (충남대학교 농업생명과학대학) ;
  • 박기웅 (충남대학교 농업생명과학대학) ;
  • 이형석 (우송정보대학) ;
  • 이수기 (충남대학교 농업생명과학대학)
  • Received : 2016.11.11
  • Accepted : 2016.12.14
  • Published : 2016.12.31

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine the effects of Glycine soja (GS) supplementation on the quality of corn silage. Corn silage was used in a $3{\times}2$ factorial arrangements with respective factors being addition of GS (0, 10, and 20%) and without or with Lacobacillus plantarum as lactic acid bacteria, and were stored for 40 days at a room temperature ($20-25^{\circ}C$). Corn silage with supplemented 20% GS increased (p<0.05) crude protein contents compared with that in corn silage with supplemented 0 and 10% GS, however crude fat, NDF, and starch concentrations was not affected (p<0.05) by addition of GS. Furthermore, the interaction was found (p<0.05) between corn silage with supplemented 20% GS and the addition of lactic acid in butyric acid. Silage pH was increased while GS supplementation increased. Corn silage with supplemented 20% GS increased (p<0.05) glucose and fructose concentrations. The results of current study indicate that corn silage with supplemented 20% GS could be used as a useful strategy to improve corn silage with increased crude protein contents along with sucrose, glucose and fructose concentrations.

본 연구는 옥수수 사일리지의 조단백질 함량을 증가시키기 위하여 국내 야생콩을 0, 10 및 20%씩 첨가하였고 여기에 사일리지 발효촉진용 생균제를 두 수준으로 첨가하여 4반복의 $2{\times}3$의 요인실험을 실시하였다. 조단백질 함량은 야생콩 20% 첨가구가 무첨가구에 비하여 유의하게 높은 결과를 보였다. 젖산 함량은 야생콩의 첨가량이 많아짐에 따라 감소하는 경향을 나타내었는데, 20% 첨가구가 0% 첨가구에 비하여 유의하게 감소한 결과를 보였다. pH는 야생콩 첨가량이 증가함에 따라 높아지는 경향을 보였다. 각 처리구별 평균치에 있어서 유산균 처리구는 무처리구에 비하여 높은 경향을 나타내었지만 유의성은 인정되지 않았다. 결론적으로 야생콩의 첨가수준이 많아지면 전체적으로 사일리의 품질에는 부정적 요인이지만, 20% 정도의 첨가로는 단백질의 함량을 향상시키고, 젖산 함량에 있어 품질 유지에 지장이 없는 것으로 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahmed, S. and Rao, M. 1982. Performance of maize-soybean intercrop combination in the tropics : results of a multilocation study. Field Crops Res. 5:147-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(82)90015-6
  2. Albrecht, K.A. and Beauchemin, K.A. 2003. Alfalfa and other perennial legume silage. pp. 633-664. In: Buxton et al. (Eds.) Silage science and technology. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.
  3. Anil, L., Park, J. and Philips, R.H. 2000. The potential of foragemaize intercrops in ruminant nutrition. Animal Feed Sci. and Technol. 86:157-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(00)00176-0
  4. AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). 1995. Official method of analysis. (16th ed.) Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington. D.C., USA.
  5. Carruthers, K., Prithiviraj, B., Fe, Q., Cloutier, D., Martin, R.C., et al. 2000. Intercropping of corn with soybean, lupin and forages: silage yield and quality. J. Agronomy and Crop Sci. 185:177-185. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-037x.2000.00421.x
  6. Contreras-Govea, F.E., Muck, R.E., Armstrong, K.L. and Albrecht, K.A. 2009. Nutritive value of corn silage in mixture with climbing beans. Animal Feed Sci. and Technology. 150:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2008.07.001
  7. Choi, C.W. 2016. Changes in ruminal fermentation and blood metabolism in steers fed low protein TMR with protein fraction-enriched feeds. Kor. J. Agric. Sci. 43:379-386.
  8. Coors, J.G. and Lauer, J.G. 2001. Silage corn. pp. 347-392. In: Hallauer (Ed.). Specialty corns. 2nd ed. CRC Oressm Boca Raton, FL.
  9. Darby, H.M. and Lauer, J.G. 2002. Planting date and hybrid influence on corn forage yield and quality. Agron. J. 94:281-289. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2002.0281
  10. Duncan, D.B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11:1-42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478
  11. Goering, H.K. and Van Soest, P.J. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agric. Handbook. No. 379. ARS, USDA. Washington D.C., USA.
  12. Han, S.M., Kim, Y.T., Won, O.J., Choi, K.H., Rho, Y.H., et al. 2016. The importation of genetically modified crops and its environmental impacts in Korea. Kor. J. Agric. Sci. 43:215-220.
  13. Im, H., Moon, J.K. and Kim, W.S. 2016. Antibacterial activity of supernatant obtained from and on the growth of pathogenic bacteria. Kor. J. Agric. Sci. 43:415-423.
  14. Jang, W.S., Yang, B.M., Heo, J.M., Lee, H.S. and Lee, H.S. 2015. Effects of supplementation of hairy vetch on the quality of whole crop barley silage. CNU J. Agri. Sci. 42(4):383-388. (In Korean)
  15. Kim, J.E., Kim, K.H., Kim, K.S., Kim, Y.H., Kim, D.W., et al. 2016. Fermentative characteristics of wheat bran direct-fed microbes inoculated with starter culture. Kor. J. Agric. Sci. 43:387-393.
  16. Kim, JG. 2014. Diversify of conserved forage use in the country. Proceeding of 2014 symposium and congress of Korean society of grassland and forage science. Korea. pp. 11-32.
  17. Lessard, J.R., Erfle, J.D., Sauer, F.D. and Mahadevan, S. 1978. Protein and free amino acid patterns in maize ensiled with or without urea. J. Sci. Food Agric. 29:506-512. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740290603
  18. Martin, R.C., Voldeng, H.C. and Smith, D.L. 1990. Intercropping corn and soybean in a cool temperate region: Yield, protein and economic benefits. Field Crops Res. 23:295-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(90)90061-F
  19. McDonald, P. 1981. The biochemistry of silage. A Wiley-Interscience Publication. pp. 148-152.
  20. Muck, R.E., Moser, L.E. and Pitt, R.E. 2003. Postharvest factors affecting ensiling. pp. 251-304. In: Buxton, D.R., Muck, R.E. and Harrison, J.H. (Eds.). Silage science and technology. Agron. Monogr. 42. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI, USA.
  21. Mustafa, A.F. and Seguin, P. 2003. Characteristics and in situ degradability of whole crop faba bean, pea, and soybean silages. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 83(4):793-799. https://doi.org/10.4141/A03-065
  22. Ofori, F. and Stern, W.R. 1987. Cereal-legume intercropping systems. Adv. Agron. 41:41-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60802-0
  23. Putnam, D.H., Herbert, S.J. and Vargas, A. 1986. Intercropped corn-soybean density studies. II. Yield composition and protein. Exp Agric. 22:373-381. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700014629
  24. Sheaffer, C.C., Orf, J.H., Devine, T.E. and Jewett, J.G. 2001. Yield and quality of forage soybean. Agron. J. 93:99-106. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.93199x
  25. SAS Institute. 2005. SAS Prosedure guide. VERSION 8.2. SAS Inst., Cary, NC, USA.
  26. Singh, N.B., Singh, P.P. and Nair, K.P.P. 1986. Effect of legume intercropping on enrichment of soil nitrogen, bacterial activity and productivity of associated maize crops. Exp Agric. 22:339-344. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700014587
  27. Weinberg, Z.G. and Muck, R.E. 1996. New trends and opportunities in the development and use of inoculants for silage. FEMS Micro-biol. REV. 19:53-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.1996.tb00253.x
  28. Wilinson, J.M., Bolsen, K.K. and Lin, C.J. 2003. History of silage. Silage Science and Technology, pp. 1-30. In: Buxton, D.R., Muck, R.E. and Harrison, J.H. (Eds.). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, USA.