The Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of the Effect of Peer-to-peer Relay Feedback Strategy on Achievement and Communication ability in Mathematics

동료 릴레이 피드백 전략이 수학과 학업성취도와 수학적 의사소통능력에 미치는 영향

  • Received : 2016.07.13
  • Accepted : 2016.11.21
  • Published : 2016.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of peer-to-peer relay feedback strategy on achievement in mathematical problem solving and mathematical communication ability. The experimental instruction was given to 99 students. They were divided into two groups. In this research a strategy of peer-to-peer relay feedback is developed. To enhance lateral communication, students were instructed according to the strategy to read open-type problems, to write mathematical ideas individually and to share their ideas and get feedback in relay method with peers within a small subgroup. The results are as follows. 1) Mathematics achievement assessments were carried six times in the cleanup phases of the class. There was no difference at the 1st test. 2) The second t-test of mathematical communication abilities showed that there was meaningful difference and that peer-to-peer relay feedback was effective. But there was no difference on reading. 3) Peer-to-peer relay feedback strategy has a positive impact.

Keywords

References

  1. 교육부 (2015). 수학 교사용 지도서, 서울: 천재교육.
  2. Ministry of Education (2015). Mathematics teachers guidebook, Seoul: Chunjaeeducation.
  3. 권오남, 조영미, 박정숙, 박지현, 김영숙 (2003). 수학적 창의성과 개방형 문제, 수학교육논문집 16, 217-218
  4. Gwon, O., Cho, Y., Park, J., Park, J., & Kim, Y. (2003). Mathematics originality and open ended problem, Communication of Mathematical Education 16, 217-218.
  5. 김두찬 (2000). 소집단 토의학습을 통한 수학과 문제 해결력 향상에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문, 건국대학교.
  6. Kim, D. (2000). On the improvement of the problem solution in Mathematics through the discussion by small groups. Master's thesis, Kon-Kuk University.
  7. 김민정 (2008). 교사 피드백과 동료 피드백이 한국어 다시 쓰기에 미치는 영향 비교. 석사학위논문, 이화여자대학교.
  8. Kim, M. (2008). Comparison of the Effects of Teacher and Peer Feedback on Rewriting in Korean as a Second language. Master's thesis, Ewha Womans University.
  9. 김선희 (1998). 의사소통 지도가 수학 학습에 미치는 효과. 석사학위논문, 이화여자대학교.
  10. Kim, S. (1998). Effects of communication in learning Mathematics. Master's thesis, Ewha Womans University.
  11. 김희영 (2012). 의사소통 중심 수학 수업이 학습자의 수학적 학습태도에 미치는 영향. 석사학위논문, 강원대학교.
  12. Kim, H. (2012). How the learner's attitude on math class gets influenced when the class put emphasis on the communication. Master's thesis, Kangwon National University.
  13. 도종훈 (2007). 개방형 문제를 어떻게 만들 것인가? : 두개의 개방형 문제 제작 사례 중심으로, 한국학교수학회 10(2), 221-235.
  14. Do, J. (2007). How to Pose an Open Problem? : Two Cases of Posing an Open-ended Problem by Reorganizing Given Closed Problems, The Korean School Mathematics Society 10(2), 221-235.
  15. 박재현 (2008). 서술형과제에 대한 평가피드백 유형이 학업성취수준에 따라 수학 불안, 자아개념 및 학업 성취도에 미치는 영향. 석사학위논문, 고려대학교.
  16. Park, J. (2008). The effect of the Evaluation Feedback about Descriptive Taskes on studesnts' math anxiety, self-concept and academic achievement based on different academic achievement levels. Master's thesis, Korea University.
  17. 박준형 (2007). 수학적 의사소통을 통한 분수의 덧셈과 뺄셈의 오류 교정. 석사학위 논문, 경인교육대학교.
  18. Park, J. (2007). Correcting Errors in Adding and Subtracting Fraction Through Mathematical Communication. Master's thesis, Gyeongin National University of Education.
  19. 오지연 (2010). 수학적 의사소통 중심의 발견학습이 학업 성취도와 수학 학습태도에 미치는 영향. 석사학위논문, 서울교육대학교.
  20. Oh, J. (2010). The Effects of Mathematical Communication-Centered Discovery Learning on Academic Achievement and Attitude towards Mathematics. Master's thesis, Seoul National University of Education.
  21. 오태욱 (2009). 동료 피드백을 활용한 수학적 의사소통 수업의 효과 분석. 석사학위논문, 서울교육대학교.
  22. Oh, T. (2009). The Effects of Mathematical Communicaion-Centered Teaching focused on Peer Feedback. Master's thesis, Seoul National University of Education.
  23. 오영열, 오태욱 (2009). 동료 피드백을 활용한 수학적 의사소통이 수학 학습에 미치는 효과, 수학교육 23(2), 327-347.
  24. Oh, Y., & Oh, T. (2009). The Effect of Mathematial Communication-Centered Teaching Using Peer Feedback on Mathematics Learning, The Mathematical Education 23(2), 327-347.
  25. 유선화 (2003). 학습형태 및 소집단 구성에 따른 수학적 의사소통 지도에 대한 적용 연구. 석사학위논문, 전주교육대학교.
  26. You, S. (2003). A Study on Application of Mathematical Communication According to Learning Model and Small Group Formation. Master's thesis, Jeonju National University of Education.
  27. 이상우 (2009). 살아있는 협동학습, 서울: 시그마프레스.
  28. Lee, S. (2009). A living cooperative learning, Seoul: Sigmapress.
  29. 이종희 (2002). 수학적 의사소통, 서울: 교우사.
  30. Lee, J. (2002). Mathematics Communication, Seoul: Kyowoosa.
  31. 이종희. 김선희. 채미애 (2002). 수학적 의사소통능력의 평가 기준 개발, 대한수학교육학회 11(1). 207-221
  32. Lee, J., Kim, S., & Chae, M. (2002). The Assessment Rublic Development of Mathematics Communication Ablity. School Mathematics11(1). 207-221
  33. 조영준 (2010). 초등수학교실에서 나타난 수학적 의사소통 유형분석. 석사학위논문, 서울교육대학교.
  34. Cho, Y. (2010). Analysis of pattern of mathematical interaction occurring in the elementary school mathematics classrooms. Master's thesis, Seoul National University of Education
  35. 조황배 (2002). 토의식 협력 학습을 통한 수학과 문제 해결력 신장 방안. 석사학위논문, 창원대학교 .
  36. Cho, H. (2002). A method for the development of ability to solve mathematical problems through cooperation learning by discussion. Master's thesis, Changwon National University.
  37. 채미애 (2001). 수학적 의사소통 능력을 강조한 수업의 효과. 석사학위논문, 이화여자대학교 .
  38. Chae, M. (2001). Effects of the study that emphasize the Mathematical Communication Ability. Master's thesis, Ewha Womans University.
  39. 채미애 (2002). 수학적 의사소통 능력을 강조한 수업의 효과, 이화교육논총 12, 213-235.
  40. Chae, M. (2002). Effects of the study that emphasize the Mathematical Communication Ability. Ewha Education Federation of Teachers ' Association 12, 213-235.
  41. 최민성 (1997). 토의식 학습이 수학성취도와 문제해결력에 미치는 효과 분석. 석사학위논문, 한국교원대학교.
  42. Choi, M. (1997). Effects on Mathematical Achievement and Problem Solving Performance by Small Group Discussion. Master's thesis, Korean National University of Education.
  43. 최수근 (2006). 수학과 협동학습에서 집단구성방법이 학업성취도 및 학습태도에 미치는 영향. 석사학위논문, 경남대학교.
  44. Choi, S. (2006). The Effect of Grouping Methods of Cooperative Learning on Academic Achievements and Learning Attitudes in Mathematics. Master's thesis, Kyungnam University.
  45. 최혁렬 (2011). 수학교육에서 교사와 동료의피드백이 학업성취에 미치는 영향. 석사학위논문, 인천대학교교육대학원.
  46. Choi, H. (2011). The effect of a feedback by a teacher and a friend in Mathematics Education. Master's thesis, Incheon National University of Education.
  47. 홍우주 (2008). 초등학교 6학년 수학 수업에서 이루어지는 교사와 학생의 의사소통과 학생의 수학적 사고 분석. 석사학위 논문, 한국교원대학교 .
  48. Hong, W. (2008). An Analysis of Teacher-Student Communication and Student Mathematical Thinking in Elementary Mathematics Classes of Sixth Graders. Master's thesis, Korean National University of Education.
  49. 홍지연 (2011). 수학과 토의 토론 수업의 필요성과 활용방법에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문, 연세대학교.
  50. Hong, J. (2011). A study on a model of holding class discussion and debates in math classes. Master's thesis, Yonsei University.
  51. Borasi, R. (1986). On the Educational Roles of Mathematical Errors : Beyound - 65 - diagnosisand remediation, doctorial dissertation, State university of New York at Buffalo.
  52. Borasi, R. (1996). Reconceiving Mathematics Instruction: A Focus on Errors. AblexPublishing Corporation.
  53. Kagan, S(1994). Cooperative learning. San Clemente : Kagan Cooperative Learning.
  54. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, Va.: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
  55. Mehan (1979). Learning lessons : social organization in the classroom, Harvard University press.
  56. Moynihan, C.M. (1994). A model and study of the role of communication in the mathematics learning proess, PH. D. Boston University.
  57. Sadler, P.M., & Good, E. (2006). The impact of Self-and Peer-Grading on Student Learning, Educational Assessment, 11(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea1101_1
  58. Tillema, H., & Leenknecht, M. (2011). Assessing assessment quality: Criteria for quality assurance in design of (peer) assessment for learning- A review of research studies in Educational Evaluation, 37, 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.004