DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

U-type Cross-Counter Indirect Evaporative Cooler made of Plastic/Paper

U형 직교 대향류 플라스틱/종이 재질 간접증발소자

  • Kim, Nea-Hyun (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Incheon National University)
  • Received : 2016.08.08
  • Accepted : 2016.11.10
  • Published : 2016.11.30

Abstract

In Korea, the summer is hot and humid, and much electricity is consumed for air conditioning. Thus, the simultaneous usage of an indirect evaporative cooler and a common air conditioner could reduce the sensible heat and save electricity. This study developed a U-type cross-counter flow indirect evaporative cooler (IEC) made of plastic and paper. The efficiencies were compared with those of a cross-flow IEC. The specimen was $500mm{\times}500mm{\times}1000mm$. the results show that the indirect evaporation efficiencies of the cross-counter flow sample were 6-21% higher than those of the cross-flow sample. The pressure drops of the cross-counter sample were 51-66% higher. Thermal analysis based on the -NTU method predicted the experimental data within 10%. The electrical energy saved by the use of the cross-counter flow IEC was larger than that of the counter flow IEC, and the difference increases with the velocity. However, the the cross-counter IEC is two times larger than the cross-flow IEC, which may increase the material cost and water usage.

여름철이 무더운 대한민국에서는 냉방에 많은 전력을 소비한다. 이 경우 간접증발냉각을 동시에 적용하면 전기 사용을 줄일 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 플라스틱/종이 재질의 U형 직교대향류 간접증발소자를 개발하고 그 성능을 기존의 직교류소자와 비교하였다. 시료의 크기는 $500mm{\times}500mm{\times}1000mm$이었다. 직교대향류 소자의 간접증발효율은 직교류 소자의 간접증발효율보다 6~21% 크고 그 차이는 전방 풍속이 증가할수록 증가하였다. 이는 직교대향류 소자의 크기가 크고 (대향류의 2배) 직교 대향류의 유용도가 직교류의 유용도보다 크기 때문이다. 직교대향류 소자의 압력손실은 직교류 소자의 압력손실보다 2배 가량 컸다. 습채널의 압력손실도 건채널보다 51~66% 컸다. ${\epsilon}$-NTU 방식의 해석 모델은 실험 데이터를 ${\pm}10%$ 이내에서 예측하였다. 직교대향류 소자를 사용하였을 때 절약되는 전기에너지는 직교류 소자의 값보다 크고 그 차이는 풍속이 증가할수록 증가하였다. 하지만 직교대향류 소자의 크기가 직교류 소자에 비하여 2배 크므로 원가의 상승과 분무수 사용량의 증가가 예상된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Duan, Z., Zhan, C., Zhang, X., Mustafa, M. Zhao, X., Alimohammadisgvand, B. and Hasan, A., "Indirect evaporative cooling: past, present and future potentials," Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 16, pp. 6823-6850, 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.07.007
  2. Jaber, S. and Ajib, S., "Evaporative cooling as an efficient system in Mediterranean region," Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 31, pp. 2590-2596, 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.04.026
  3. Caliskan, H., Dincer, I. and Hepbasil, A., "Exergoeconomic enviroecomomic and sustainability analyses of a novel air cooler," Energy Build., vol. 55, pp. 747-756, 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.03.024
  4. Costello, B. and Finn, D., "Thermal effectiveness characteristics of low approach indirect evaporative cooling systems in buildings," Energy Build., vol. 39, pp. 1235-1243, 2007. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.01.003
  5. Maheshwari, G. P., Al-Ragom, F. and Suri, R. K., "Energy saving potential of an indirect evaporative cooler," Appl. Energy, vol. 69, pp. 69-76, 2001. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0306-2619(00)00066-0
  6. Santamouris, M. and Kolokotsa, D., "Passive cooling dissipation techniques for buildings and other structures: the state of the art," Energy Build., vol. 57, pp. 74-94, 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.11.002
  7. Watt, J. D. and Brown, W. K., Evaporative No. 0, Air Conditioning Handbook, 3rd ed., The Fairmont Press Inc., 1997.
  8. Pescod, D., "A heat exchanger for energy saving in an air conditioning plant," ASHRAE Trans., vol. 85., Pt. 2, pp. 238-251, 1979.
  9. Maclaine-Cross, I. L. and Banks, P. J., "A general theory of wet surface heat exchangers and its application to regenerative cooling," J. Heat Transfer, vol. 103, pp. 578-585, 1981. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.3244505
  10. Kettleborough, C. F. and Hsieh, C. S., "The thermal performance of the wet surface plastic plate heat exchanger used in an indirect evaporative cooler," J. Heat Transfer, vol. 105, pp. 366-373, 1983. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.3245587
  11. Parker, R. O. and Treybal, R. E., "The heat mass transfer characteristics of evaporative coolers," Chem. Eng. Prog. Symp. Ser. vol 57, no. 32, pp. 138-149, 1962.
  12. Hasan, A. an Siren, K., "Performance investigation of plain and finned tube evaporatively cooled heat exchangers," Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 325-340, 2003. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1359-4311(02)00194-1
  13. Zalewski, W. and Gryglaszewski, P. A., "Mathematical model of heat and mass transfer processes in evaporative coolers," Chem. Eng. Process, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 271-280, 1977. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0255-2701(97)00006-8
  14. Ren, C. and Yang, H., "An analytical model for the heat and mass transfer processes in indirect evaporative cooling with parallel/counter flow configurations," Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 49, pp. 617-627, 2006. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2005.08.019
  15. Hasan, A., "Going below the wet-bulb temperature by indirect evaporative cooling: Analysis using a modified $\epsilon$-NTU method," Appl. Energy, vol. 89, pp. 237-245, 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.07.005
  16. Cui, X., Chua, K. J., Islam, M. R. and Yang, W. M., "Fundamental formulation of a modified LMTD method to study indirect evaporative heat exchangers," Energy Conservation Management, vol. 88, pp. 372-381, 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.08.056
  17. Chen, Y., Yang, H. and Luo, Y., "Indirect evaporative cooler considering condensation from primary air; Model development and parameter anaysis," Build. Env., vol. 95, pp. 330-345, 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.09.030
  18. Tejero-Gonzalez, A., Andres-Chicote, M., Velasco -Gomez, E. and Rey-Martinez, F. J., "Influence of constructive parameters on the performance of two indirect evaporative cooler prototypes," Appl. Therm. Eng., vol, 51, pp. 1017-1025, 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.10.054
  19. Riangvilaikul, B. and Kumar, S., "An experimental study of a novel dew point evaporative cooling system," Energy Build., vol. 42, pp. 637-644, 2010. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.07.020
  20. Zhao, X., Liu, S. and Riffat, S. B., "Comparative study of heat and mass exchanging materials for indirect evaporative cooling systems," Build. Environ., vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 1902-1911, 2008. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.11.009
  21. Kim, N.-H., "Performance comparison between indirect evaporative coolers made of aluminum, plastic or plastic/paper," J. Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 8165-8175, 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2015.16.12.8165
  22. KS M 896, Paper and Plate - Measuremint of Water Absorption Rate in Water, 2013.
  23. ASHRAE Standard 41.1, Standard Method for Temperature Measurement, ASHRAE, 1986.
  24. ASHRAE Standard 41.2, Standard Method for Laboratory Air-Flow Measurement, ASHRAE, 1987.
  25. KS C 9306, Air Conditioner, Korean Standard Association, 2010.
  26. ASHRAE Standard 143, Method of Test for Rating Indirect Evaporative Coolers, ASHRAE, 2007.
  27. Klein S. J. and McClintock, F. A., "The description of uncertainties in a single sample experiments," Mech. Eng, vol. 75, pp. 3-9, 1953.
  28. Stevens, R. A., Fernandez, J. and Woolf, J. R., "Mean temperature difference in one, two and three-pass cross flow heat exchangers," Trans. ASME, vol. 79, pp. 287-297, 1957.
  29. Kays, W. M. and London, A. L., Compact Heat Exchangers, McGraw-Hill Pub., 1984.
  30. Personal communication with Samhwa Ace Co., 2016.