DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch.) Leaf Powder on Quality Characteristics, Antioxidant Activities, and Retarding Retrogradation by Shelf-Life of Sulgidduck (Rice Cake)

호박잎 분말을 첨가한 설기떡의 품질 특성, 항산화 활성 및 저장 기간에 따른 노화 억제 효과

  • 송가영 (고려대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 오현빈 (고려대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 장양양 (고려대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 정기영 (고려대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 김영순 (고려대학교 식품영양학과)
  • Received : 2016.08.09
  • Accepted : 2016.10.26
  • Published : 2016.12.31

Abstract

This study investigated quality characteristics, antioxidant activities, and retarding retrogradation of Sulgidduck, traditional rice cake of Korea, prepared using rice flour added with 0%, 1%, 2%, 3%, and 4% pumpkin leaf powder. Moisture content of pumpkin leaf Sulgidduck showed a tendency to increase in the 1% and 2% added group but decrease in the 3% and 4% added group. pH level significantly increased (4.50~6.16) with an increase in content of pumpkin leaf powder (P<0.05). For color, as content of pumpkin leaf powder increased, L-value decreased and b-value increased. Hardness tended to increase with addition of pumpkin leaf powder except for the 1% added group. Springiness was not significantly different (P<0.05). Chewiness and adhesiveness increased according to addition level increase. Retarding retrogradation showed that the pumpkin leaf powder added group had a stronger effect compared to the control, whereas the 2% added group presented the most retarding retrogradation effect with the lowest Avrami exponent. Total phenols content and ABTS radical scavenging activity tended to increase as content of pumpkin leaf powder increased. Sensory properties by 7-point scale test showed that the 2% added group had the highest scores, whereas the 4% added group had the lowest scores. These results suggest that pumpkin leaf is considered as a good material to improve quality characteristics, antioxidant activities, and retarding retrogradation of Sulgidduck. The most appropriate proportion for the greatest effect of retarding retrogradation in Sulgidduck was considered to be 2%.

본 연구에서는 멥쌀가루를 이용하여 한국의 전통 떡인 설기떡을 제조한 후, 멥쌀가루의 0%, 1%, 2%, 3% 및 4% 비율의 호박잎 분말을 첨가하여 설기떡의 품질 특성, 항산화 특성 및 노화 억제 효과를 살펴보고자 하였다. 호박잎 설기떡의 수분 함량은 대조군(39.18%)과 비교하여 호박잎 분말 1%와 2% 첨가군에서 증가하였다가 3% 첨가군과 4% 첨가군에서는 감소하는 경향을 나타내었다. pH는 호박잎 분말의 첨가량이 증가함에 따라 4.50~6.16으로 유의적으로 증가하는 경향을 나타내었다(P<0.05). 색도의 경우 호박잎 분말의 첨가량이 증가할수록 L값은 감소하고 b값은 증가하는 경향을 나타내었다. 호박잎 설기떡에서 경도는 대조군이 $207.50g/cm^2$, 호박잎 분말 1% 첨가군에서 $186.10g/cm^2$로 감소하였다가 2~4%에서 $225.77{\sim}249.70g/cm^2$로 다시 증가하였다. 탄력성은 81.72~88.02%로 유의적인 차이가 없었으며, 씹힘성과 부착성은 호박잎 분말 첨가량이 증가할수록 증가하는 경향을 나타내었다. 호박잎 분말을 첨가한 설기떡의 노화도 분석은 호박잎 분말 첨가군이 대조군(7.47)에 비해 높은 시간상수 값으로 노화 억제 효과가 있는 것으로 보였으며, 호박잎 분말 첨가군 중 2% 첨가군이 낮은 Avrami 지수 값으로 호박잎 첨가군 중 노화 억제 효과가 가장 크게 나타났다. 총 페놀화합물 및 ABTS 라디칼 소거 활성은 호박잎 분말의 첨가량이 증가함에 따라 증가하는 경향을 나타내었다. 7점 척도법을 이용한 소비자 기호도 조사 결과 색, 향, 촉촉함, 단맛, 씹힘성 및 전반적인 기호도에서 호박잎 분말 2% 첨가군이 가장 높은 기호도를 나타낸 반면, 4% 첨가군은 다른 시료들에 비해 낮은 기호도를 나타내었다. 이상의 결과로 미루어 보아 호박잎 분말의 첨가는 설기떡의 품질 특성 및 항산화 효과를 증진시킬 수 있는 것으로 여겨지며, 저장성을 고려한 노화 억제 효과를 위해서는 2%의 호박잎 분말의 첨가가 적합한 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kwak Y, Ju J. 2013. Antioxidant and anti-cancer activities of squash (Cucurbita moschata Duch.) leaf extract in vitro. Korean J Food Sci Technol 45: 770-776. https://doi.org/10.9721/KJFST.2013.45.6.770
  2. Lee JM, Park DK, Kwon YM. 2011. Pumpkin-Fall in love with pumpkins. National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science Rural Development Administration, Suwon, Korea. p 128-129.
  3. Cha YY. 2009. Experimental study on effects of Cucurbita moschata Duch. on antioxidation. J Soc Korean Med Obesit Res 9: 57-63.
  4. Kim HK, Jin HH, Lee MS, Lee SJ. 2013. Quality characteristics of Sulgidduck added with Corni fructus powder. Food Eng Prog 17: 105-111. https://doi.org/10.13050/foodengprog.2013.17.2.105
  5. Choi BS, Kim HY. 2010. Quality characteristics of Sulgidduck added with perilla leaves. Korean J Culinary Res 16: 299-310.
  6. Yoon SJ. 2007. Quality characteristics of Sulgitteok added with lotus leaf powder. Korean J Food Cook Sci 23: 433-442.
  7. Kim JH, Kim MY. 2011. Quality characteristics of Sulgidduk supplemented with citrus peel powder. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 40: 993-998. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2011.40.7.993
  8. Lee MH, Jeon SJ, Kim SK, Park HS, Choi YS. 2011. The quality characteristics of Curcuma longa L powder Sulgidduck. Korean J Culinary Res 17: 184-192.
  9. Bae YJ, Hong JS. 2007. The quality characteristics of Sulgidduk with added buchu (Allium tuberosum R.) powder during storage. J East Asian Diet Life 17: 827-833.
  10. Lee K, Lee JC, Lee JK, Park WJ. 2001. Effect of addition of minor ingredients for the quality characteristics of Sulgiduck. Korean J Diet Cult 16: 399-406.
  11. Lee YN, Lee JH, Kim YS. 2012. Quality properties of Sulgidduck with the different density of rice powder made by multifunctional grinder. Korean J Food Nutr 25: 1008-1015. https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2012.25.4.1008
  12. Kim YS. 2008. Addition ratio of buckwheat vegetable powder (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) on the quality characteristics of Sulgidduck. Korean J Food Nutr 21: 436-442.
  13. Rojas JA, Rossell CM, Benedito De Barber C. 2001. Role of maltodextrins in the staling of starch gels. Eur Food Res Technol 212: 364-368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002170000218
  14. Akay S, Alpak I, Yesil-Celiktas O. 2011. Effects of process parameters on supercritical $CO_2$ extraction of total phenols from strawberry (Arbutus unedo L.) fruits: an optimization study. J Sep Sci 34: 1925-1931. https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.201100361
  15. Rha YA, Kang BN. 2014. Quality evaluation of sulgidduck added with Rubus coreanus Miquel leaf powder. Korean J Culinary Res 20: 125-135.
  16. Park SS, Kim SI, Sim KH. 2011. The quality characteristics and antioxidative activity of Sulgidduck supplemented with ramie leaf powder. Korean J Food Cook Sci 27: 763-771. https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2011.27.6.763
  17. Ahn GJ. 2010. Quality characteristics of Sulgidduck added by different amount of bamboo leaf flour. Korean J Culinary Res 16: 104-111.
  18. Yoo KM, Kim SH, Chang JH, Hwang IK, Kim KI, Kim SS, Kim YC. 2005. Quality characteristics of Sulgidduck containing different levels of dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) leaves and roots powder. Korean J Food Cook Sci 21: 110-116.
  19. Yoo SS, Ko SH. 2014. Quality characteristics of Sulgidduck with beet leaf powder. Korean Food Cook Sci 30: 119-128. https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2014.30.2.119
  20. Choi BS, Kim HY. 2011. Quality characteristics of Sulgidduck added with Hydrangea serrata Seringe powder. Korean J Community Living Sci 22: 257-265. https://doi.org/10.7856/kjcls.2011.22.2.257
  21. Cho GS, Kim AJ. 2015. Antioxidative activity of sea buckthorn and quality characteristics of brown rice sulgidduck. Fam Environ Res 53: 17-27. https://doi.org/10.6115/fer.2015.002
  22. Kim SS, Chung HY. 2010. Retarding retrogradation of Korean rice cakes (Karaedduck) with a mixture of trehalose and modified starch analyzed by Avrami kinetics. Korean J Food Nutr 23: 39-44.
  23. Lee YH, Moon TW. 1994. Composition, water-holding capacity and effect on starch retrogradation of rice bran dietary fiber. Korean J Food Sci Technol 26: 288-294.
  24. Lee HJ, Kim SY, Park JH, Kim RY, Jeong HS, Park E. 2013. Changes in the antioxidantive and antigenotoxic effects after the cooking process of Sulgidduck containing pine noodle juice. Korean J Food Cook Sci 29: 453-462. https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2013.29.5.453
  25. Choi EJ, Kim EK. 2015. Antioxidant, physicochemical, and sensory characteristics of Sulgidduck fortified with water extracts from Moringa oleifera leaf. Korean J Food Cook Sci 31: 335-343. https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2015.31.3.335

Cited by

  1. Quality Properties, Retarding Retrogradation Effect and Antioxidant Activities of Garaedduk with Freekeh vol.34, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2018.34.5.493
  2. Storage stability of sourdough bread with lactic acid bacteria culture solution and cinnamon extract vol.26, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.11002/kjfp.2019.26.1.17
  3. Quality Evaluation of Brown Rice Sulgidduk added with Jerusalem Artichoke Powder vol.29, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2019.4.29.2.112
  4. Quality Characteristics of Sulgidduk Added with Lactuca sativa during Storage vol.30, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2020.4.30.2.90
  5. The Quality Characteristics of Sulgidduk Made with Equisetum Arvense Powder vol.31, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.7856/kjcls.2020.31.4.575
  6. Antioxidant Activities and Quality Characteristics of Sulgidduck with Added Lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus) Powder vol.31, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2021.2.31.1.72
  7. Quality Evaluation and Antioxidative Activity of Sulgidduk with the Addition of Finger Root Powder vol.32, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7856/kjcls.2021.32.2.257
  8. The Quality Characteristics of Sulgidduk made with Morinda citrifolia(Noni) Powder vol.32, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.7856/kjcls.2021.32.4.569