Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Centrality Analysis of Industry Sector for National Flagship Industry Selection

국가주력산업 선정을 위한 산업의 중심성 분석

  • 김성록 (공주대학교 지역사회개발학부) ;
  • 이종상 (공주대학교 지역사회개발학부)
  • Received : 2015.08.21
  • Accepted : 2016.01.05
  • Published : 2016.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The selection of a flagship industry is based on whether the industry's developmental impact is great and whether the industry can be the center of the national economy. Here, a ripple effect may be derived by analyzing the forward and backward linkage effects, but in the case of industries that are the centerpieces of the national economy, each researcher reported different results. Consequently, they could not agree on their flagship industry despite belonging to the same time. This study presents a prestige centrality of network analysis as a way of analyzing an industry, which was the center of the national economy, and performed empirical analysis utilizing the 2013 I-O Table. The analysis showed that the industries classified as those with high centrality include the energy industry, which is essential for economic development, can create a synergy effect with other industries, such as the transportation industry, industries with a high level of export and employment, such as electronics and chemicals, and industries for domestic demand, such as wholesale and retail, food services and accommodation.

일관된 산업정책을 추진하기 위해서는 국가의 산업구조에 대한 분석이 필수적이다. 전통적으로 각 국가들은 주력산업을 선정하여 이에 대한 지원과 관리를 통한 경제 활성화를 위하여 노력한다. 주력산업은 해당산업의 발전파급효과가 크고, 국민경제의 중심이 되는 산업을 선정기준으로 한다. 여기서 파급효과는 전후방연쇄효과를 분석하여 도출할 수 있으나, 국민경제의 중심이 되는 산업의 경우 각 연구자마다 상이한 방법으로 분석하였다. 이에 따라 동일 시기임에도 불구하고 주력산업이 일치되지 못하는 경우가 빈번하였다. 이 연구에서는 국민경제의 중심이 되는 산업을 분석하는 방법으로 네트워크분석의 위세중심성을 제시하고 그 실증분석으로 2013년 산업연관표를 활용하여 연구를 수행하였다. 분석결과, 경제활동에 필수적인 동력산업, 운송업과 같은 타산업의 발전과 함께 시너지 효과를 낼 수 있는 산업, 전자 화학과 같은 수출 및 고용이 높은 산업, 도매 및 소매업 음식점 및 주점업과 같은 내수산업 등이 중심성이 높은 산업으로 분석되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, "Trends and Analysis of Our Flagship Industry", KDI, 2002.
  2. K.Y. Kim, "Korea-China Trade Patterns Change and Implication on Flagship Industry", KIET Industrisl Economic, 275, 2005.
  3. K.S. Lee, "Globalzation Level of Korea Flagship Industry and Global Competitive Level", KIET Industrisl Economic, 200708, pp. 3-20, 2007.
  4. J.H. Hong, "Flagship Industry Selection Analysis for Revitalization of Regional Economy", Korean Journal of Policy analysis and Evaluation, 7(1), pp. 129-152, 1997.
  5. T.H. Seong, "Specialization of Regional Industry for the 21st Century focussed on Biotech Industry in Kyungnam", The Journal of Industrial Management, 26, pp5-17, 2000.
  6. C.K. Lee, "Analysis on the Intra-regional Industrial Linkage Structures in Gyeongbuk Region", Journal of Korean National Economy, 30(1), pp. 141-168, 2012.
  7. Y.J. LEE, S.H. Ko and S.M. Yoon, "The Impacts of Existence of Leading Industries on Regional Economic Performances", Journal of the Korean Regional Development Association, 26(2), pp. 101-128, 2014.
  8. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, "2012 White Paper of Industry Trade", 2013.
  9. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy Press Release, "Major Industry Ternds and Reponses on 2014", 01-07-2014.
  10. Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning, "The Industrial Technology Workers of Top8 Industry", 2008.
  11. Korea Evaluation Institute of Indestrial Technoligy, "Industry Convergence of Flagship Industry R&D Strategy 2013 - 2017", 2012.
  12. C.H. Lee, "Korea Major Industry Issues and Diagnostics", CEO Information, 882, 2013.
  13. K.Y. Lee. and Y.J. Jang, "Top 10 Industry Prospects and Policy Issues in 2013", KIET Industrisl Economic, 2013, 02, pp. 7-23, 2013
  14. J.H. Shin, "An Analysis on Growth Factors of 10 Key Industries in Korea Using Structural Decomposition", Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 26(6), pp. 2477-2496, 2013.
  15. J.G. Kim and C. J., "The Second Half of 2015 Industrial Prospects", KIET Industrisl Economic, 201507, pp20-35, 2015.
  16. Y.H. Kim, "Social Network Analysis", Parkyoungsa, 2011.
  17. D.W. Son, "Social Network Analysis", Kyungmoonsa, 2005.
  18. H.Y. Lee, H.J. Kim, "The Analysis of the Structure of Commuting Network in Seoul Metropolitan Area", Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society, 9(1), pp91-111, 2006
  19. Hubbell, C.H. (1965), "In input-output approach to clique identification," Sciometry Vol 28 No 4, 377-399. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2785990
  20. Bonacich, P. (1972), "Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification," Journal of Mathematical Sociology Vol 2, 113-120. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1972.9989806
  21. Bonacich, P. (1987), "Power and Centrality : a family of measures," American Journal of Sociology, Vol 92, 1170-1182. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/228631
  22. Smith, D. A., and D. R. White (1992) "Structure and dynamics of the global economy: network analysis of international trade 1965-1980," Social Forces, Vol 70, 857-893. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2580193
  23. Smith, D., and M. Timberlake (2002) "Hierarchies of dominance among World Cities: A Network Approach," Global networks, linked cities, 117-143.
  24. Alderson, A.S., and Beckfield, J. (2004), "Power and position in the world city system," American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 109 No. 4, 811-851. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/378930
  25. S.Y. Oh, "Network Analysis on the Centrality of Airports", master at graduate of In-Ha University, 2011
  26. Bank of Korea, "Input-Output Analysis Commentation", 2004.
  27. Segye News, "Korea Economy SOS, Slow, Old, Intermediate", 04-11-2013.
  28. D.S. Kim, "Korea Industrial Structures Changes on Time Series I-O Tables," KDI, 2003.