References
- Abbate MF, Tjan AHL, Fox WM. Comparison of the marginal fit of various ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent, 61(5), 527-531, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90270-9
- Al-Amleh B, Lyons K, Swain M. Clinical trials in zirconia: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil, 37(8), 641-652, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02094.x
- Choi CE, Lee HY. Comparative studies of accuracy for impression materials and die materials. The Journal of the Korean Dental Association, 21(1), 157-165, 1983.
- Cho LR, Chung KH, Kim KN. A study on the contact angle and wettability of the dental stones. J Korean Acad Prosthodont, 41(1), 61-70, 2003.
- Chong YH, Soh G, Setchell DJ, Wickens JL. The relationship between contact angles of die stone on elastomeric impression materials and voids in stone casts. Dent Mater, 6(3), 162-166, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(90)90022-7
- Chung IS, Jeon BW, Kim WY. Comparison of marginal fitness of zirconia copings according to impression techniques and zirconia blocks. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 16(1), 151-157, 2016.
- Duke PD, Moore BK, Haug SP, Andres CJ. Study of the physical properties of type IV gypsum, resin-containing and epoxy die materials. J Prosthet Dent, 83(4), 466-473, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70043-6
- Khalid AA, Ayman E. The effect of adding a stone base on the accuracy of working casts using different types of dental stones. J Contemp Dent Pract, 7(4), 17-28, 2006.
- Kim WY, Chung IS, Jeon BW. Comparison of mechanical properties of all ceramic crown on zirconia blocks. J Kor Aca Den Tec, 37(3), 107-113, 2015. https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2015.37.3.107
- Lee DY, Oh YI, Chung KH, Kim KM, Kim KN. Mechanism study on surface activation of surfactant-modified polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. J Appl Polym Sci, 92(4), 2395-2401, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.20177
- Lepe X, Johnson GH, Berg JC, Aw TC, Stroh GS. Wettability, imbibition, and mass change of disinfected low-viscosity impression materials. J Prosthet Dent, 88(3), 268-276, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.128757
- Lorren RA, Salter DJ, Fairhurst CW. The contact angles of die stone on impression materials. J Prosthet Dent, 36(2), 176-180, 1976. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(76)90140-2
- McLean JW, Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J, 131(3), 107-111, 1971. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
- Michalakis KX, Kapsampeli V, Kitsou A, Kirmanidou Y, Fotiou A, Pissiotis AL, Calvani PL, Hirayama H, Kudara Y. Marginal adaptation of four inlay casting waxes on stone, titanium, and zirconia dies. J Prosthet Dent, 112(1), 70-78, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.01.009
- Millstone PL. Determining the accuracy of gypsum casts made from Type IV dental stone. J Oral Rehabil, 19(3), 239-242, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1992.tb01098.x
- Panichuttra R, Jones RM, Goodacre C, Munoz CA, Moore BK. Hydrophilic poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials: dimensional accuracy, wettability, and effect on gypsum hardness. Int J Prosthodont, 4(3), 240-248, 1991.
- Persson AS, Odeen A, Andersson M, Sandborgh- Englund G. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual threedimensional analysis of exactness. Dent Mater, 25(7), 929-936, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.01.100
- Schelb E, Cavazos E, Troendle KB, Prihoda TJ. Surface detail reproduction of type IV dental stones with selected polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. Quintessence Inter, 22(1), 51-55, 1991.
- Zisman WA, Fox HW. Journ. J Coll Sci, 5, 514, 1950. https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-8522(50)90044-4