DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the evaluation of the support policy for the export of China software using fuzzy-AHP

퍼지-계층분석을 이용한 중국 소프트웨어 수출지원정책 성과평가 연구

  • Choi, JeongHo (Management science and engineering, beijing university of technology) ;
  • Zhang, YongAn (Management science and engineering, beijing university of technology)
  • 최정호 (북경공업대학 관리과학 및 공학학과) ;
  • 장영안 (북경공업대학 관리과학 및 공학학과)
  • Received : 2016.10.08
  • Accepted : 2016.11.03
  • Published : 2016.11.30

Abstract

This study is the result of a fuzzy-AHP-based evaluation of the support policy for the export of Chinese software, for which nine Class 1 evaluation indexes were established. Following a survey of 10 Chinese software experts, fuzzy AHP was used to assess and evaluate the absolute and relative importance of each index. The evaluation revealed that the support policy had relatively positive effects. More specifically, the analysis showed that several indices - technology development, HR development, marketing reinforcement, fund support, platform establishment, and product support - carried relatively significant importance. Quality management and tax deductions, on the other hand, showed no importance, while the importance of international certification was relatively small. In light of these discoveries, there is a need to train experts, increase software quality, and reconsider software brands.

본 문은 퍼지-계층분석 (fuzzy-AHP)을 기반으로 중국 소프트웨어 수출지원정책 성과평가를 분석 연구하였다. 기술개발, 품질관리 등 9개의 1급 성과 평가지표 체계를 구성하고, 10명의 중국 소프트웨어전문가에 대한 설문조사를 실시한 후, 퍼지-계층분석을 활용하여 절대적 상대적 중요도를 산정하여, 퍼지 종합평가를 실시하였다. 평가한 결과, 중국 소프트웨어 수출지원정책 성과는 전반적으로 양호한 수준으로 나타났다. 기술개발, 인재양성, 마케팅강화, 자금지원, 플랫폼구축, 제품지원의 영향력은 비교적 중요하고, 품질관리, 세수감면의 영향력은 변화가 없으며, 국제인증의 영향력은 비교적 작은 것으로 분석되었다. 이에 따라 고급 소프트웨어 전문인력을 양성하고, 소프트웨어 품질을 강화하며, 소프트웨어 브랜드를 제고할 필요가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi, K. H. and Han, D. W. (2010). The fuzzy AHP approach to the relative importance of the deciding factors for admission screening-z university case study. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 21, 699-708.
  2. Choi, Y. J. (2007). A measurement model of service quality using fuzzy theory and analytic hierarchy process, Doctoral Thesis, Kyonggi University, Seoul.
  3. Eom, J. S. and Kim, S. B. (2013). Study on the defence R&D project risk analysis using AHP. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 24, 557-569. https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2013.24.3.557
  4. Kim, C. H. (2003). Study on the performance evaluation for hotels based on the fuzzy-AHP model, Doctoral Thesis, Sejong University, Seoul.
  5. Park, S., Hong, Y. W. and Na, J. K. (2012). A method for selecting the evaluation index of defence R&D project by AHP. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 23, 961-970. https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2012.23.5.961
  6. Saaty, T, L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
  7. Wang, H. J. (2015). Study on and evaluation of the compensational policy for basin ecosystem based on Fuzzy-AHP theory, Master Thesis, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, China.
  8. Wu, Y. Q. (2016). Study on and evaluation of the development of University Waste reclamation logistics based on fuzzy-AHP theory, MasterThesis, Guangxi Normal University for Nationalities, Chongzuo, China.