DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A New Shuttle Plasmid That Stably Replicates in Clostridium acetobutylicum

  • Lee, Sang-Hyun (Department of Biotechnology, Graduate School, Korea University) ;
  • Kwon, Min-A (R&D Center, GS Caltex Corporation) ;
  • Choi, Sunhwa (R&D Center, GS Caltex Corporation) ;
  • Kim, Sooah (Department of Biotechnology, Graduate School, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Jungyeon (Department of Biotechnology, Graduate School, Korea University) ;
  • Shin, Yong-An (R&D Center, GS Caltex Corporation) ;
  • Kim, Kyoung Heon (Department of Biotechnology, Graduate School, Korea University)
  • Received : 2014.04.27
  • Accepted : 2014.05.28
  • Published : 2015.10.28

Abstract

We have developed a new shuttle plasmid, designated as pLK1-MCS that can replicate in both Clostridium acetobutylicum and Escherichia coli, by combining the pUB110 and pUC19 plasmids. Plasmid pLK1-MCS replicated more stably than previously reported plasmids containing either the pIM13 or the pAMβ1 replicon in the absence of antibiotic selective pressure. The transfer frequency of pLK1-MCS into C. acetobutylicum was similar to the transfer frequency of other shuttle plasmids. We complemented C. acetobutylicum ML1 (that does not produce solvents such as acetone, butanol, and ethanol owing to loss of the megaplasmid pSOL1 harboring the adhE1-ctfAB-adc operon) by introducing pLK1-MCS carrying the adhE1-ctfAB-adc operon into C. acetobutylicum ML1. The transformed cells were able to resume anaerobic solvent production, indicating that the new shuttle plasmid has the potential for practical use in microbial biotechnology.

Keywords

Introduction

The genus Clostridium consists of versatile, gram-positive, strictly anaerobic, and solvent-producing bacteria with extreme biocatalytic activities [5, 13, 15, 30]. However, the potential metabolic capacities of Clostridia have not been closely examined until recently, because genetic inaccessibility of these bacteria has prevented detailed research at the molecular level. The genome sequences of some Clostridia have been determined and this information provides new opportunities, including commercial production of biofuel from renewable biomass, elucidation of virulence mechanisms in pathogenic species, and development of protection methods for the species [5, 6, 24, 26, 31]. In spite of their physiological and industrial importance, research on the genus Clostridium is restricted owing to the absence of a proper system for genetic manipulation [9]. Accordingly, an effective host/plasmid system is needed to develop strains that have high metabolic activity.

Several shuttle plasmids that can replicate in both Clostridia and E. coli have been developed. Among them, plasmids containing the pIM13 and pAMβ1 replicons such as pIM1 and pMTL500E, respectively, replicate in C. acetobutylicum. However, none of these plasmids have been used for industrial applications because they are segregationally unstable in the absence of appropriate antibiotics during cultivation [20]. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a segregationally stable plasmid system for the industrial-scale production of biochemicals and biofuels by C. acetobutylicum.

In this study, we report that the new shuttle plasmid pLK1-MCS, which harbors the replication origins of both pUB110 and pUC19, can replicate in both C. acetobutylicum andE. coli. We also report that by using this shuttle plasmid, we can construct a recombinant plasmid that stably replicates and expresses recombinant genes in C. acetobutylicum.

 

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains, Plasmids, Primers, and Enzymes

The bacterial strains, plasmids, and primers used in this study are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. E. coli XL1-Blue was used as the cloning host, and E. coli TOP10 (pAN1) was used for in vivo methylation before transformation into C. acetobutylicum. Clostridia were used as host cells for the shuttle plasmids, and C. acetobutylicum ML1 was used for complementary expression of the adhE1-ctfAB-adc operon. All restriction enzymes and T4 DNA ligase were purchased from New England Biolabs (Ipswich, MA, USA). Pfu-X polymerase was purchased from Solgent (Daejeon, Korea).

Table 1.Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study.

Table 2.aRestriction enzyme sites are shown in bold font.

Media and Culture Conditions

E. coli was grown aerobically in 2× YTG liquid medium (16 g Bactotryptone, 10 g yeast extract, 4 g NaCl, and 5 g glucose per liter) on a shaking incubator at 200 rpm, or on 2× YTG agar medium at 30℃. All Clostridia were anaerobically cultured in clostridial growth medium (CGM) containing 0.75 g K2HPO4, 0.75 g KH2PO4, 0.7 g MgSO4·7H2O, 0 .017 g MnSO4·5H2O, 0.01 g FeSO4·7H2O, 2 g (NH4)2SO4, 1 g NaCl, 2 g asparagine, 0.004 g p-aminobenzoic acid, 5 g yeast extract, 4.08 g CH3COONa·3H2O, and 80 g glucose per liter. All media components used in this study were purchased from Difco (Detroit, MD, USA) and other chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

Plasmid Construction

For the construction of pLK1-MCS, PCR was performed to amplify the pUB110 origin using pSM704 as template DNA with primers 1 and 2. The resulting 1.3 kb DNA fragment was isolated using the Wizard SV Gel Clean-up System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), digested with SacI and BglII, and then subcloned into pMTL500E digested with SacI and BamHI to construct the plasmid pLK1-temp. Next, a DNA fragment containing the thiolase promoter derived from C. acetobutylicum, a ribosomal binding sequence (RBS; AGGAGG), and a unique multiple cloning site (PmeI, PstI, BglII, XhoI, NotI, SalI, XbaI, XmaI (SmaI), and EcoRI) was amplified with primers 3 and 4 using pGS1-MCS as template DNA. The resulting fragment was digested with SmaI and SacI and subcloned into PvuII- and SacI-digested pLK1-temp to construct the plasmid pLK1-MCS (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.Construction scheme for the shuttle plasmid pLK1-MCS. The oripUB110 and the repA gene encoding the replication initiator originated from plasmid pSM704, and the ampicillin resistance (Apr) and erythromycin resistance (Emr) genes, together with oripMB1, originated from plasmid pMTL500E. PThl denotes the promoter region of the thiolase gene in C. acetobutylicum ATCC 824.

The C. acetobutylicum adhE1-ctfAB-adc operon, including the terminator of the adc gene, was amplified by PCR using the genomic DNA of C. acetobutylicum as a template and primers 5 and 6. The resulting 5.6 kb fragment was digested with PmeI and SalI and then cloned into pLK1-MCS to make the plasmid pLK1-E1ABC. The genomic DNA for PCR was isolated using the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega).

Electroporation

Electroporation was performed as previously described [19]. C. acetobutylicum was cultured anaerobically to an OD600 of 1.0 in CGM (pH 5.8) at 37℃. The cells were collected by centrifugation at 3,000 ×g (5702R; Effendorf, Hamburg, Germany) for 20 min at 4℃ after storing on ice for 10 min. The cell pellet was washed three times with electroporation buffer (270 mM sucrose and 686 mM NaH2PO4, pH 7.4, ice-chilled before use) and then resuspended in 2 ml of the buffer. All plasmid DNAs were methylated in E. coli TOP10 (pAN1) before transformation into C. acetobutylicum for protection from the C. acetobutylicum restriction system [18]. Electroporation was performed using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA; 2.5 kV, ∞ Ω, and 25 μF) with 4 mm electrode gap cuvettes (Bio-Rad) containing electrocompetent cells and plasmid DNA (5 μg). After the electroporation, 1 ml of 2× YTG medium was added to the mixture and incubated anaerobically at 37℃ for 4 h. The cells were then spread onto CGM agar containing 40 μg/ml erythromycin and incubated in an anaerobic chamber at 37℃.

Plasmid Stability

The segregational stability of pLK1-MCS, pGS1-MCS, and pMTL500E was determined with slight modification of a previous protocol [28]. A single colony of C. acetobutylicum ATCC 824 harboring each plasmid was inoculated into a 50 ml conical tube containing 40 ml of liquid CGM without antibiotics and cultured anaerobically at 37℃ for 24 h. The cells were diluted and spread onto CGM agar plates without antibiotics so that the cell numbers could be counted. After 36 h of incubation, 50 colonies were transferred from the CGM agar plate to a CGM agar plate containing erythromycin (40 μg/ml) by replica plating to count the colonies and to determine segregational stability. Relative segregational stability was determined as follows:

where Sr, Nt, and Ne represent relative segregational stability, total colony number replica plated, and the colony number grown on replica plate containing erythromycin after 36 h incubation, respectively.

Forty microliters of the resting cell broth was inoculated into 40m l of fresh liquid CGM in order to achieve a 1:1,000 dilution. Since the cells were diluted 1,000 times at the end of each cycle, it was assumed that one cycle represented approximately 10 generations. After 100 generations, the shuttle plasmids were isolated from C. acetobutylicum and subsequently re-transformed into competent E. coli XL1-Blue (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA) cells. All plasmid DNA isolations were performed using the Wizard Plus SV miniprep kit (Promega). Plasmid DNAs isolated from E. coli XL1-Blue were fully sequenced by primer walking (Solgent, Daejeon, Korea).

Fermentation

Batch fermentation was carried out in a Bioflo 310 bioreactor (Effendorf, Hamburg, Germany) containing 1.6 L of CGM supplemented with 80 g/l glucose. A single colony was grown anaerobically to an OD600 of 1.0. This seed culture was transferred to a 500 ml flask containing 360 ml of CGM. When the cell density reached an OD600 of 1.0, the flask culture was inoculated into the bioreactor. The pH was kept above 5.0 and controlled with an ammonia solution without dilution during fermentation. The temperature and agitation speed were controlled at 37℃ and 200 rpm, respectively. During fermentation, the bioreactor was flushed with oxygen-free nitrogen at a flow rate of 50ml /min to maintain anaerobic conditions.

Analysis of Metabolites

Cell growth was monitored by measuring the OD600 using a DR5000 spectrophotometer (HACH, Loveland, CO, USA). Metabolites were determined using a gas chromatography system (Agilent 6890N, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) and a packed column (80/120 Carbopack BAW glass column; Supelco, St. Louis, MO, USA). Helium gas was used as a carrier phase at a flow rate of 20 ml/min with the septum purge flow of 3 ml/min. Conditions for metabolite analysis were as follows: inlet heater temperature at 250℃; oven temperature of 90℃ for 2 min, ramping to 170℃ at 5℃/min, and holding at 170℃ for 2 min; and FID at 280℃. The glucose concentration was analyzed using a high-performance liquid chromatography system (Agilent 1200 series) equipped with a reflective index detector and an Aminex-87H column (Bio-Rad). A 0.01 N H2SO4 solution was used as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.6 ml/min and the oven temperature was adjusted to 80℃ for optimal column performance.

 

Results and Discussion

Construction of C. acetobutylicum-E. coli Shuttle Plasmid

Many replicons originating from various gram-positive bacteria can replicate in Clostridia [7, 12, 25, 27, 29, 32]; however, only a few replicons (i.e., pAMβ1, pIM13, and pT127) can be maintained in C. acetobutylicum [5]. Among them, pIM13 and pT127 are listed as class I staphylococcal plasmids. The class I plasmids can replicate in many gram-positive bacteria, including staphylococci, bacilli, and streptococci. For example, pIM13 can replicate in Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, and C. acetobutylicum [18, 22]. The cryptic plasmid pUB110, which was originally found in S. aureus [2], can replicate in B. subtilis [8, 11] and in C. beijerinckii SA-1 (ATCC 35702, formerly known as C. acetobutylicum SA-1) [17]. Therefore, we examined the properties of pUB110 as a replicon for C. acetobutylicum. The pLK1-MCS shuttle plasmid was constructed by combining a partial pUB110 fragment, which included the replication origin (oripUB110) and replication initiator gene (repA) from plasmid pSM704, with the E. coli pMB1 origin (oripMB1) and the selection markers (i.e., erythromycin and ampicillin resistance genes; Emr and Apr) from the shuttle plasmid pMTL500E (Fig. 1). In addition, the shuttle plasmid contained the promoter (PThl) of the thiolase gene from C. acetobutylicum ATCC 824 and the RBS to allow expression of a recombinant gene. pLK1-MCS was transferred into Clostridia for further study.

Transfer Frequency and Host Spectrum of the Shuttle Plasmid

Each of the plasmids pLK1-MCS, pMTL500E, and pGS1-MCS was transformed individually into C. acetobutylicum ATCC 824, C. beijerinckii NCIMB 8025, and C. saccharobutylicum NCP 262, and the transformation efficiencies were calculated (Table 3). The transfer frequency in C. acetobutylicum was similar among the plasmids. However, pLK1-MCS could not replicate in either C. beijerinckii or C. saccharobutylicum. A previous report suggested that pUB110 can replicate in C. beijerinckii SA-1 [17], which is not consistent with our results. This inconsistency may be due to host differences between SA-1 and NCIMB 8052, or may be because pLK1-MCS did not contain the appropriate DNA region necessary for replication in C. beijerinckii NCIMB 8052. In fact, pUB110 has two replication origins; a minus origin and a plus origin [1]. In this study, we used the plus origin to construct the pLK1-MCS shuttle plasmid. Recently, the restriction mechanism of C. saccharobutylicum was described and found to differ from that of C. acetobutylicum [16]. The inability to transform C. saccharobutylicum with the shuttle plasmid pLK1-MCS may be due to improper methylation by phi-3T methyltransferase (Mtase). As a result, pLK1-MCS replicated only in C. acetobutylicum ATCC 824.

Table 3.aThe values are transformant colonies per 10 μg plasmid DNA.

Segregational Stability of Plasmid pLK1-MCS

The transformants carrying pLK1-MCS (pUB110 replicon), pGS1-MCS (pIM13 replicon), and pMTL500E (pAMβ1 replicon) were used to examine the segregational stability of the plasmids during liquid culture in the absence of antibiotics for 100 generations. Cells were plated on CGM agar plates without antibiotics, and 50 colonies were selected to identify plasmid loss by replica plating onto plates containing erythromycin for every 10 generations (Fig. 2). pLK1-MCS showed superior segregational stability compared with pGS1-MCS and pMTL500E. After the segregational test of 100 generations, pLK1-MCS was isolated from C. acetobutylicum and re-transformed to E. coli XL1-Blue to analyze the sequence of the re-transformed plasmid. It was found that pLK1-MCS was structurally stable in C. acetobutylicum without any mutation, including deletion, rearrangement, or point mutation during the 100 generations.

Fig. 2.Comparison of the segregational stability of three shuttle plasmids, pLK1-MCS, pGS1-MCS, and pMTL500E, in C. acetobutylicum ATCC 824 for 100 generations.

Complementation of adhE1-ctfAB-adc Operon in C. acetobutylicum ML1

Recently, we isolated mutant C. acetobutylicum ATCC 824 (designated as C. acetobutylicum ML1). This mutant was found to lack the pSOL1 megaplasmid, which contains four genes (i.e., adhE1, adhE2, ctfAB, and adc) required for ABE production. The loss of pSOL1 in C. acetobutylicum ML1 was confirmed by PCR with the appropriate primer pairs (Table 2). The megaplasmid loss in C. acetobutylicum ML1 was further confirmed by PCR with primers 15 and 16, which bind to the oxidoreductase gene in pSOL1 (Fig. 3 and Table 2). C. acetobutylicum ML1 does not produce ABE, owing to the loss of megaplasmid pSOL1 (Table 4), as was previously described for C. acetobutylicum M5 [3]. The previous studies reported that M5 could be complemented for ABE production by homologous expression of adhE1, ctfAB, and adc genes [4, 23]. To prove the practical stability of our shuttle plasmid in C. acetobutylicum, pLK1-E1ABC was constructed and introduced into C. acetobutylicum ML1. In order to identify genetic complementation and to confirm ABE production, batch fermentations were performed for 42 h. Although the titers of solvent produced by transformed ML1 were not similar to the titers obtained from wild types, substantial levels of all solvents (i.e., acetone, butanol, and ethanol) were measured (Table 4). After fermentation, the recombinant plasmids were isolated and re-transformed into E. coli XL1-Blue for sequence analysis. The results showed that the plasmid was stably maintained in ML1 without recombination or mutation. From the segregational stability and complementation experiments, we confirmed that the shuttle plasmid can stably replicate in C. acetobutylicum.

Fig. 3.Confirmation of loss of pSOL1 in C. acetobutylicum ML1. Results from PCR using ATCC 824 (WT, wild type) indicate that pSOL1 is present in these cells. Results using ML1 and M5 indicate that pSOL1 is absent from these cells. The ptbbuk operon, which resides on the chromosome of C. acetobutylicum, was amplified from DNA templates to confirm that the prepared DNA templates were derived from C. acetobutylicum strains. Lane M, 1 kb ladder; 1, adhE1 (2.6 kb); 2, adhE2 (2.6 kb); 3, ctfAB (1.3 kb); 4, adc (0.7 kb); 5, ptbbuk (2.0 kb).

Table 4.Concentration of metabolites produced by recombinant C. acetobutylicum in batch fermentation.

In conclusion, a new C. acetobutylicum-E. coli shuttle plasmid, pLK1-MCS, was constructed by combining the pUB110 and pMB1 replicons. The shuttle plasmid is more stably maintained than pMTL500E (pAMβ1 replicon) and pGS1-MCS (pIM13 replicon) and is structurally stable in C. acetobutylicum for 100 generations without mutation. Recombinant genes in the shuttle plasmid can be functionally expressed in C. acetobutylicum ML1. Therefore, the shuttle plasmid is useful as a genetic tool in industrial biotechnology using C. acetobutylicum and E. coli.

References

  1. Boe L, Gros MF, te Riele H, Ehrlich SD, Gruss A. 1989. Replication origins of single-stranded-DNA plasmid pUB110. J. Bacteriol. 171: 3366-3372. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.171.6.3366-3372.1989
  2. Chopra I, Bennett PM, Lacey RW. 1973. A variety of staphylococcal plasmids present as multiple copies. J. Gen. Microbiol. 79: 343-345. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-79-2-343
  3. Clark SW, Bennett GN, Rudolph FB. 1989. Isolation and characterization of mutants of Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 deficient in acetoacetyl-coenzyme A: acetate/butyrate:coenzyme A-transferase (EC 2.8.3.9) and in other solvent pathway enzymes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55: 970-976.
  4. Cornillot E, Nair RV, Papoutsakis ET, Soucaille P. 1997. The genes for butanol and acetone formation in Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 reside on a large plasmid whose loss leads to degeneration of the strain. J. Bacteriol. 179: 5442-5447. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.179.17.5442-5447.1997
  5. Dürre P. 2004. Handbook on Clostridia, pp. 659-699. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
  6. Feinberg L, Foden J, Barrett T, Davenport KW, Bruce D, Detter C, et al. 2011. Complete genome sequence of the cellulolytic thermophile Clostridium thermocellum DSM1313. J. Bacteriol. 193: 2906-2907. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00322-11
  7. Firth N, Apisiridej S, Berg T, O’Rourke BA, Curnock S, Dyke KG, Skurray RA. 2000. Replication of staphylococcal multiresistance plasmids. J. Bacteriol. 182: 2170-2178. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.182.8.2170-2178.2000
  8. Gryczan TJ, Contente S, Dubnau D. 1978. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus plasmids introduced by transformation into Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 134: 318-329.
  9. Heap JT, Pennington OJ, Cartman ST, Minton NP. 2009. A modular system for Clostridium shuttle plasmids. J. Microbiol. Methods 78: 79-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2009.05.004
  10. Jang YS, Lee JY, Lee J, Park JH, Im JA, Eom MH, et al. 2012. Enhanced butanol production obtained by reinforcing the direct butanol-forming route in Clostridium acetobutylicum. mBio 3: e00314. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00314-12
  11. Keggins KM, Lovett PS, Duvall EJ. 1978. Molecular cloning of genetically active fragments of Bacillus DNA in Bacillus subtilis and properties of the vector plasmid pUB110. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75: 1423-1427. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.75.3.1423
  12. Leblanc DJ, Lee LN. 1984. Physical and genetic analyses of streptococcal plasmid pAM beta 1 and cloning of its replication region. J. Bacteriol. 157: 445-453.
  13. Lee J, Seo E, Kweon DH, Park K, Jin YS. 2009. Fermentation of rice bran and defatted rice bran for butanol production using Clostridium beijerinckii NCIMB 8052. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 19: 482-490. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.0804.275
  14. Lee SJ, Kim DM, Bae KH, Byun SM, Chung JH. 2000. Enhancement of secretion and extracellular stability of staphylokinase in Bacillus subtilis by wprA gene disruption. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66: 476-480. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.2.476-480.2000
  15. Lepiz-Aguilar L, Rodriguez-Rodriguez CE, Arias ML, Lutz G. 2013. Acetone-butanol-ethanol (ABE) production in fermentation of enzymatically hydrolyzed cassava flour by Clostridium beijerinckii BA101 and solvent separation. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 23: 1092-1098. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1301.01021
  16. Lesiak JM, Liebl W, Ehrenreich A. 2014. Development of an in vivo methylation system for the solventogen Clostridium saccharobutylicum NCP 262 and analysis of two endonuclease mutants. J. Biotechnol. 188C: 97-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.07.005
  17. Lin YL, Blaschek HP. 1984. Transformation of heat-treated Clostridium acetobutylicum protoplasts with pUB110 plasmid DNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 48: 737-742.
  18. Mermelstein LD, Papoutsakis ET. 1993. In vivo methylation in Escherichia coli by the Bacillus subtilis phage phi 3T I methyltransferase to protect plasmids from restriction upon transformation of Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59: 1077-1081.
  19. Mermelstein LD, Welker NE, Bennett GN, Papoutsakis ET. 1992. Expression of cloned homologous fermentative genes in Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824. Biotechnology 10: 190-195. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0292-190
  20. Minton NP, Brehm JK, Swinfield T-J, Whelan SM. 1993. Clostridial cloning vectors, pp. 119-150. In Wood DR (ed.). The Clostridia and Biotechnology. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, MA, USA.
  21. Minton NP, Oultram JD. 1988. Host:vector systems for gene cloning in Clostridium. Microbiol. Sci. 5: 310-315.
  22. Monod M, Denoya C, Dubnau D. 1986. Sequence and properties of pIM13, a macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance plasmid from Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 167: 138-147. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.167.1.138-147.1986
  23. Nair RV, Papoutsakis ET. 1994. Expression of plasmidencoded aad in Clostridium acetobutylicum M5 restores vigorous butanol production. J. Bacteriol. 176: 5843-5846. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.176.18.5843-5846.1994
  24. Poehlein A, Hartwich K, Krabben P, Ehrenreich A, Liebl W, Durre P, et al. 2013. Complete genome sequence of the solvent producer Clostridium saccharobutylicum NCP262 (DSM 13864). Genome Announc. 1: e00997.
  25. Purdy D, O’Keeffe TA, Elmore M, Herbert M, McLeod A, Bokori-Brown M, et al. 2002. Conjugative transfer of clostridial shuttle vectors from Escherichia coli to Clostridium difficile through circumvention of the restriction barrier. Mol. Microbiol. 46: 439-452. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03134.x
  26. Sandoval-Espinola WJ, Makwana ST, Chinn MS, Thon MR, Azcarate-Peril MA, Bruno-Barcena JM. 2013. Comparative phenotypic analysis and genome sequence of Clostridium beijerinckii SA-1, an offspring of NCIMB 8052. Microbiology 159: 2558-2570. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.069534-0
  27. Scheer-Abramowitz J, Gryczan TJ, Dubnau D. 1981. Origin and mode of replication of plasmids pE194 and pUB110. Plasmid 6: 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-619X(81)90054-8
  28. Shin MH, Jung MW, Lee J-H, Kim MD, Kim KH. 2008. Strategies for producing recombinant sucrose phosphorylase originating from Bifidobacterium longum in Escherichia coli JM109. Process Biochem. 43: 822-828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2008.03.006
  29. Titok MA, Chapuis J, Selezneva YV, Lagodich AV, Prokulevich VA, Ehrlich SD, Janniere L. 2003. Bacillus subtilis soil isolates: plasmid replicon analysis and construction of a new theta-replicating vector. Plasmid 49: 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-619X(02)00109-9
  30. Veeranagouda Y, Benndorf D, Heipieper HJ, Karegoudar TB. 2008. Purification and characterization of NAD-dependent n-butanol dehydrogenase from solvent-tolerant n-butanoldegrading Enterobacter sp. VKGH12. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 18: 663-669.
  31. Wu YR, Li Y, Yang KL, He J. 2012. Draft genome sequence of butanol-acetone-producing Clostridium beijerinckii strain G117. J. Bacteriol. 194: 5470-5471. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01139-12
  32. Yu M, Du Y, Jiang W, Chang WL, Yang ST, Tang IC. 2012. Effects of different replicons in conjugative plasmids on transformation efficiency, plasmid stability, gene expression and n-butanol biosynthesis in Clostridium tyrobutyricum. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 93: 881-889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3736-y

Cited by

  1. Biomass, strain engineering, and fermentation processes for butanol production by solventogenic clostridia vol.100, pp.19, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7760-9
  2. Single Crossover-Mediated Markerless Genome Engineering in Clostridium acetobutylicum vol.26, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1512.12012
  3. Biological Methanol Production by a Type II Methanotroph Methylocystis bryophila vol.26, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1601.01013
  4. Potential of Immobilized Whole-Cell Methylocella tundrae as a Biocatalyst for Methanol Production from Methane vol.26, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1602.02074
  5. Part by Part: Synthetic Biology Parts Used in Solventogenic Clostridia vol.7, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.7b00327