DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Experimental Study on the Ultimate Strength of Aluminum Alloy Single Shear Bolted Angle Connections

알루미늄합금(6063-T5) 앵글 볼트접합부의 최대내력에 관한 실험적 연구

  • Kim, Tae-Soo (Department of Architectural Engineering, Hanbat National University)
  • 김태수 (한밭대학교 건축공학과)
  • Received : 2015.08.07
  • Accepted : 2015.11.18
  • Published : 2015.11.30

Abstract

Angle-section members are widely used as tension members bolted with the main structures of building. Current design specifications for tensile net-section fracture capacity present strength reduction factor to account for the strength reduction effects by shear-lag and bending moment induced from load eccentricity. In this paper, reduction factors used in bolted angle connections were investigated and net-section efficiency were compared according to the change of plate thickness, end distance and bolt arrangement. Most of specimens failed by tensile net-section fracture accompanied by curling (out-of-plane deformation) at outstanding leg exception to some specimens with short end distance and $1{\times}1$(single) bolt arrangement. Curling changed the fracture mode and reduced the strength in bolted angle connection. Curling deformation got larger with the increase of end distance in the parallel to loading direction and. Also, net-section efficiency has tended to get higher according to the increase of bolt number and plate thickness. Test strengths were compared with those by strength equations of current design codes and existing study results.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국과학재단

References

  1. Aidam, N. S. (1990). Analysis of Block Shear Experiments for Structural Steel Anglel in Tension Members MS. Thesis. University of Connecticut.
  2. Aluminum Association. (2000). Aluminum Design Manual, Washington (DC): The Aluminum Association.
  3. Aluminum Association. (2010). Aluminum Design Manual, Washington (DC): The Aluminum Association.
  4. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). (2010). Steel Construction Manual. AISC 325-11, Chicago, USA.
  5. American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI). (2012). North American Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members, AISI S100-12, Washington D.C., USA.
  6. Architectural Institute of Korea(AIK). (2009). Korea Building Code(KBC2009), Seoul.
  7. Brungraber, R. J. & Clark J. W. (1960). Strength of welded aluminum columns. Journal of Structural Division, ASCE 1960, 33-57.
  8. Chesson, E. & Munse, W. H. (1963). Riveted and bolted joints: Truss type tensile connection. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 89(1), 67-106.
  9. Cho, Y. H., Choi, Y. C., & Kim, T. S. (2013). A Comparison on the Ultimate Behavior of Bolted Connections with Aluminum Alloys(6061-T6) according to Bolt Shear Loading, Architectural Institute of Korea, AIK, 29(11), 13-20.
  10. Chung, K. R. & Um, K. H. (2004). Structural design and construction of aluminum dome for Yong-san station, Korean association of spatial structures, 4(4), 15-19.
  11. Howard, I. E. (1992). An Experimental Study of Block Shear Failure of Angles in Tension, AISC Engineering Journal. 2nd Qtr., 75-84.
  12. IS:800. (2007). Indian Standard Code of Practice for general Construction in Steel, India.
  13. Kang, H. S. & Kim, T. S. (2015). An Experimental Study on Ultimate Strength of Aluminum Alloy Single Shear Bolted Connections with Curling Influence, Architectural Institute of Korea, AIK, 31(4), 71-78. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2015.31.12.71
  14. Kim T. S. (2013). An Experimental Study on Structural Behaviors of Single Shear Bolted Connections with Thin-Walled Aluminum Alloys(6061-T6), Architectural Institute of Korea, AIK, 29(6), 49-56.
  15. Korean Standard(KS) (2011). Aluminium and aluminium alloy extruded shapes, Korean Standards, KS D 6759, Seoul, Korea.
  16. Lee, E. T., Kim, J. H., Park, J. Y., & Lee, H. H. (2004). Block Shear Rupture and Shear Lag of Single angle in Tension Joint, Architectural Institute of Korea, AIK, 20(11), 19-26.
  17. Munse, W. H. & Chesson, E. (1963). Riveted and bolted joints: Net section design. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 89(1), 107-126.
  18. Prabha, P. & Jayachandran, S. A. (2011). Prediction of the tensile capacity of cold formed angles experiencing shear lag, Thin-Walled Structures, 49, 1348-1358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2011.06.003
  19. Usha. (2003). Analytical study of nonlinear behavior of steel angle tension members. MS thesis, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras.
  20. Wang, C. & Menzemer, C. C. (2005). Shear Lag in Bolted Single Aluminum Angle Tension members, Journal of materials Engineering and Performance, 14(1), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.1361/10599490522383
  21. Wu, Y. & Kulak, G. L. (1993). Shear Lag in Bolted Single and Double Angle Tension Members, Structural Engineering Report 187, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.