DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Quality Characteristics of Public Open Data

공공개방데이터 품질 특성에 관한 연구

  • Park, Go-Eun (The Graduate School of Software, Soongsil University) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Jae (The Graduate School of Software, Soongsil University)
  • 박고은 (숭실대학교 소프트웨어특성화대학원) ;
  • 김창재 (숭실대학교 소프트웨어특성화대학원)
  • Received : 2015.08.12
  • Accepted : 2015.10.20
  • Published : 2015.10.28

Abstract

Public data open is one of the important tasks of Korea Government 3.0. By making open data available to the private sector, the goal is to create jobs, increase innovation and improve quality of life. Public data open is a policy that emphasized its importance worldwide. Open data should have adequate quality in order to achieve the object of the public. However, there are open data's quality problems due to the lack of data quality management and standardization. The purpose of this study is to derive data characteristics of public open data from existing researches. In addition, the model was modified and verified through a survey targeting the experts on public open data. The study indicates that public open data's quality characteristics as publicity, usability, reliability, suitability. This study is significant in that it suggests quality characteristics to improve the data quality and promote utilization of the open data.

공공데이터 개방은 민간을 포함한 누구나 공공데이터를 자유롭게 재이용하여 국민 삶의 질을 높이고 신(新) 산업, 일자리 창출로 창조 경제 활성화에 기여하고자 하는 목표를 가진다. 공공데이터 개방은 전 세계적으로 중요성이 강조되고 있는 정책이며, 개방의 성공 사례들이 만들어지고 있다. 공공개방데이터는 공공의 목적을 달성하기 위해 이에 적합한 품질을 갖추어야 한다. 그러나 공공데이터 품질 관리와 표준화의 미흡으로 인한 오류데이터 발견 및 활용성 저하 문제가 제기되며, 품질에 관한 가이드라인이 미흡하다. 이에 본 연구에서는 기존의 데이터 품질과 공공데이터 품질, 공공 서비스 품질에 관한 복합적 시각을 적용한 연구를 통해 개방 공공데이터가 갖춰야 할 품질 특성에 대해 도출하고 전문가 설문을 통해 모델을 수정 및 검증하였으며, 그 결과 공공개방데이터의 품질 특성으로 공공성, 활용성, 신뢰성, 적합성을 도출하였다. 공공개방데이터의 품질 향상과 활용 활성화를 위해 갖춰야 할 품질 특성을 제시함에 본 연구의 의의가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. National Information Society Agency Republic of Korea, "National Informatization White Paper", 2014
  2. Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs, "Completion report for diagnosis and improvement of public data quality", 2014
  3. English, L. P., "Improving Data Warehouse and Business Information Quality: Methods for Reducing Costs and Increasing Profits", John Wiley & Sons, 1999
  4. Wang, R. Y. and D. M. Strong, "Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.12, No.4, pp.5-34, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1996.11518099
  5. Larry P. English, "Improving Data Warehouse and Business Information Quality.", New York : Wiley, 1999
  6. Redman, T. C, Data Quality for the Information Age, Norwood, MA: Artech House, 1996
  7. Wang, R. Y. et al. "Data quality", Vol. 23. Springer Science & Business Media., 2001
  8. Korea Database Promotion Center, Data Quality Management Maturity Model Ver 1.0, 2006
  9. ISO/IEC 25012:2008, "Software engineering -Software product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) - Data quality model,", 2006
  10. Ministry of Security and Public Administration, "Act On Promotion Of The Provision And Use Of Public Data", Article 2 (Definitions), 2013
  11. Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs, "administrative guideline of public data", 2014
  12. National Information Society Agency, "Public Information Quality Management Manual", 2012
  13. US Office OF Management And Budget, "Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity, Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by Federal Agencies", 2001
  14. Davies, Tim, "Open data barometer: 2013 global report." World Wide Web Foundation and Open Data Institute, 2013
  15. Hun Young Lee. "Data analysis using the SPSS.", Cheong Ram, 2016
  16. Seung Ho Jung, D.H.Jeong, "A Study on the Influence Factors in Data Quality of Public Organizations", Journal of korea information processing society, Vol.3 No.4, pp.251-266, 2013
  17. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L., "SERVQUAL: A Multiple-item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality", Journal of Retailing. pp.15-29, 1998
  18. Yang Ho Woo, M.Y. Hong, "A Feasibility Study on quality measurement of public service.", Journal of Korean Public Administration Quarterly, Vol.16 No.3, 2004