Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment (환경영향평가)

Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment (한국환경영향평가학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of a Vegetation Buffer Strip Module for a Distributed Watershed Model CAMEL

유역모델 CAMEL 기반 식생여과대 모듈의 개발

  • Received : 2015.09.02
  • Accepted : 2015.10.05
  • Published : 2015.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, a software module to predict the effectiveness of vegetation buffer strip (VBS) has been developed for using with Chemicals, Agricultural Management and Erosion Losses (CAMEL), a distributed watershed model. Most basic functions for the VBS module are same as CAMEL except functions newly developed to implement sedimentation enhancement by vegetation and level spreaders. For verification of the VBS module, sensitivity analyses for length, roughness, soil and vegetation type of VBS were carried out using a test grid cell. The surface discharge of sediment are highly sensitive to the roughness coefficient of VBS. The removal efficiencies of VBS for the surface discharges of sediment and TP are generally high regardless of environment changes. The surface discharges of TOC and TN are highly sensitive to the length and soil of VBS. The removal efficiencies of VBS for the surface discharges of TOC and TN are generally lower than those of sediment and TP. The newly developed VBS module reasonably simulates the removal efficiencies of surface discharges that vary according to the environment changes. It is expected that this VBS module can be used for evaluating the effectiveness of VBS-based best management practices to be applied to reduce pollution discharges from various non-point sources.

본 연구에서는 분포형 유역모델이면서, 국내 환경에 적합하도록 개발된 CAMEL에 기반하여 식생여과대 효과분석을 위한 모듈을 개발하였다. 식생여과대의 주요 모의기능은 기존의 CAMEL과 동의하나 릴에서의 유사포착 현상과 수평둔덕을 추가로 설계하여 모듈에 반영하였다. 식생여과대 모듈을 검증하기 위하여 시험 격자를 이용하여 식생여과대의 길이, 조도계수, 토성, 식생의 높이 및 뿌리 깊이 등 다양한 매개변수에 대한 민감도 분석을 실시하였다. 식생여과대 모듈의 민감도 분석결과를 종합해 보면, 유사 지표유출량은 조도계수 변화에 따라 민감하게 반응하였으며, 전반적으로는 유사와 TP의 지표유출량 저감률이 시나리오 변화에 상관없이 전반적으로 높은 것으로 분석되었다. TOC, TN의 저감률은 식생여과대의 길이, 토성변화에 따라 민감하게 반응하는 것으로 나타났으며, 유사와 TP의 지표유출량 저감률에 비해 상대적으로 저감률이 낮은 것으로 분석되었다. 본 연구에서 개발된 식생여과대 모듈은 환경변화에 따른 오염물질 저감효과를 합리적으로 재현하는 것으로 나타났으며, 향후 식생여과대 조성 지역에 적용되어 비점오염 물질 제거 효과를 정량적으로 산정하고 효율적인 관리방안을 평가하는데 기여할 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. 농림수산식품부. 2013. 농림수산식품 주요통계.(Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries(MIFAFF). 2013. Main statistics of Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries.)
  2. 농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원. 2014. 스마트한 축산통계 30.(Rural Development Adinistration, National Institute of Animal Science. 2014. Smart Livestock Statistics 30.)
  3. 박윤식, 김종건, 김남원, 박준호, 장원석, 최중대, 임경재. 2008. VFSMOD-W 모형을 이용한 SWAT 모형의 초생대 유사 저감 효율 모듈 개선, 한국물환경학회지, 24(4), 473-479.(Park YS, Kim JG, Kim NW, Park JH, Jang WS, Choi JD, Lim KJ. 2008. Improvement of Sediment Trapping Efficiency Module in SWAT using VFSMOD-W Model, Journal of Korean Society on Water Quality, 24(4), 473-479.)
  4. 한강수계관리위원회, 국립환경과학원 한강물환경 연구소. 2007. 수변완충지대 효율적 조성 및 오염부하 저감효과 분석: 최종보고서.(Han River Water System Management Committee, Han River Environment research center. 2007. A research of design and implementation of riparian buffer zones and reduction of non-point source pollutants.)
  5. Addiscott TM. 1993. Simulation modeling and soil behaviour, Geoderma, 60, 15-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(93)90016-E
  6. Addiscott TM. 1994. Simulation, prediction, foretelling or prophesy? Some thoughts on pedogenic modelling, In: Bryant, R.B. and Arnold, R.W. (Eds.) Quantitative modeling of soil forming processes, SSSA Special Publication 39. SSSA, Madison, WI. 1-15.
  7. Burrough PA. 1995. Opportunities and limitations of GIS-based modeling of solute transport at the regional scale, In: Applications of GIS to the modeling of non-point source pollutants in the vadise zone, Proceedings of 1995 Bouyoucos Conference, Riverside, CA. 1-19.
  8. Chaubey I, Chiang L, Gitau MW, Sayeed M. 2010. Effectiveness of BMPs in improving water quality in a pasture dominated watershed, J. Soil Water Conserv, 65, 424-437. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.65.6.424
  9. Dillaha TA, Sherrard JH, Lee D, Mostaghimi S, Shanholtz VO. 1988. Evaluation of vegetative filter strips as a best management practice for feed lots, Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation, 60(7), 1231-1238.
  10. Dillaha TA, Reneau RB, Mostaghimi S, Lee D. 1989. Vegetative Filter Strips for Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution Control, Transactions of the ASAE, 32(2), 513-519. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.31033
  11. Dorioz JM, Wang D, Poulenard J, Trevisan D. 2006. The effect of grass buffer strips on phosphorus dynamics-A critical review and synthesis as a basis for application in agricultural landscapes in France Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 117, 4-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.03.029
  12. Lee KH, Isenhart TM, Schultz RC. 2003. Sediment and nutrient removal in an established multi-species riparian buffer, J. Soil Water Conserv, 58 (1), 1-8.
  13. Gharabhagi B, Rudra RP, Whiteley HR, Dickinson WT. 2001. Sediment removal efficiency of vegetative filter strips, ASAE Meeting Paper no. 012071. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI.
  14. Gharabhagi B, Rudra RP, Whiteley HR, Dickinson WT. 2002. Development of a management tool for vegetative filter strips, Best modeling practices for urban water systems (Ed. W. James) volume 10 in the monograph series, 289-302.
  15. Helmers MJ, Isenhart T, Dosskey M, Dabney S, Strock J. 2006. Buffers and vegetative filter strips. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/msbasin/taskforce/2006symposia/4BuffersVegHelmers.pdf (accessed April 23, 2007).
  16. IPCC. 2006. 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories.
  17. Koo BK, Dunn SM, Ferrier RC. 2005. A distributed continuous simulation model to identify critical source areas of phosphorus at the catchment scale: model description. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 2, 1359-1404. https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-2-1359-2005
  18. Koo. 2010. Introduction to CAMEL, unpublished presentation material.
  19. Lowrance R, Leonard R, Sheridan J. 1985. Managing riparian ecosystems to control nonpoint pollution, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 40(1), 87-91.
  20. Magette WL, Brinsfield RB, Palmer RE, Wood JD. 1989. Nutrient and sediment removal by vegetated filter strips, Transactions of the ASAE 32(2): 663-667. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.31054
  21. Munoz-Carpena R, Parsons JE, Gilliam JW. 1999. Modeling hydrology and sediment transport in vegetative filter strips, J. Hydrol. 214, 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00272-8
  22. Niebling WH, Alberts EE. 1979. Composition and yield of soil particles transported through sod strips. Presented at ASAE and CSAE, Paper NO. 79-2065, St Joseph, MI, 12.
  23. Novotny V, Chesters G. 1981. Handbook of Nonpoint Pollution: Sources and Management(Van Nostrand Reinhold Environmental Engineering Series), Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  24. Parkyn S. 2004. Review of riparian buffer zone effectiveness (No. 2004-2005). Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.
  25. NRCS. 1999. The National Conservation Buffer Initiative; National Resource Conservation Service USDA: Washington DC, 53.
  26. Parajuli PB, Mankin KR, Barnes PL. 2008. Applicability of targeting vegetative filter strips to abate fecal bacteria and sediment yield using SWAT, agricultural water management, 95, 1189-1200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.05.006
  27. Sheshukov AY, Douglas-Mankin K, Daggupati P. 2009. Evaluating Effectiveness of Unconfined Livestock BMPs using SWAT, Proceedings of the 5th International SWAT Conference, Boulder, CO, Aug 5-7.
  28. Strohmeier K. 2002. Vegetative filter strips. Owen County Extension Agent for Agriculture and Natural Resources.
  29. Stutter MI, Langan SI, Lumsdon DG. 2009. Vegetated buffer strips can lead to increased release of phosphorus to waters: a biogeochemical assessment of the mechanisms, Environmental Science and Technology, 43, 1858-1863. https://doi.org/10.1021/es8030193
  30. The Water Environment (Diffuse Pollution) (Scotland) Regulations. 2008. http://www.opsi.gov.uk/legislation/scotland/ssi2008/pdf/ssi_20080054_en.pdf (accessed Feb 2009).
  31. Tollner EW, Barfield BJ, Haan CT, Kao TY. 1976. Suspended sediment filtration capacity of simulated vegetation, Trans. ASAE, 19(4), 678-682. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.36095
  32. Zreig MA, Rudra RP, Lalonde MN, Whiteley HR, Kaushik NK. 2004. Experimental investigation of runoff reduction and sediment removal by vegetated filter strips, Hydrol. Process. 18, 2029-2037. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1400

Cited by

  1. Evaluation of Pollution Loads Removal Efficiency of Vegetation Buffer Strips Using a Distributed Watershed Model vol.25, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2016.25.6.369