The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of interproximal undercut on the dimensional accuracy of impression

치간 유두 소실로 인한 언더컷이 인상체의 체적 정확도에 미치는 영향

  • Lee, Ju-Ri (Department of Prosthodontics, Samsung Medical Center, College of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Kim, Seok-Gyu (Department of Prosthodontics, Samsung Medical Center, College of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • 이주리 (성균관대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 김석규 (성균관대학교 의과대학 치과학교실)
  • Received : 2015.07.30
  • Accepted : 2015.09.09
  • Published : 2015.10.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the effect of loss of interproximal papilla, creating an undercut, on the accuracy of impression materials. Materials and methods: Two addition type silicone impression materials ($Extrude^{(R)}$ Speed Wash, $Imprint^{TM}$ II Quick Step Light Body) and one alginate impression material (Cavex Impressional) were used to make impressions of a maxillary master model simulating clinical conditions with or without interproximal papilla. Stone was poured in the impressions and working casts were fabricated. A total of 6 groups with 6 working casts in each group were scanned using 3-dimensional optical scanner. The accuracy of the impressions was assessed by measuring the dimensional changes (${\Delta}I$ (%)) of 6 distances on working casts compared to a master model with a 3-dimensional digitizing and inspection software. The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA (P<.05). Results: Three of 6 distances showed statistically significant differences among the impression materials. Only 1 of 6 distances in alginate impression showed a statistically significant difference between casts with and without interproximal papilla (P=.047). Conclusion: The presence of undercut due to loss of interproximal papilla did not significantly influence the dimensional accuracy of addition type silicone and alginate impression materials.

목적: 본 연구의 목적은 치간 유두의 소실로 인해 치아 사이에 언더컷이 존재하는 경우 이것이 인상체의 정확도에 영향을 미치는지 알아보고자 하는 것이다. 재료 및 방법: 2종류의 부가중합형 실리콘 인상재($Extrude^{(R)}$ Wash, $Imprint^{TM}$ II Quick Step Light Body)와 한 종류의 알지네이트 인상재(Cavex Impressional)로 상악 주모형의 인상을 채득하여 얻은 실험모형상의 두 점 사이의 거리를 측정하여 주모형과 비교하여 모형의 변형 정도를 측정하였다. 세 종류의 인상재에서 얻은 실험 모형들을 치간 유두가 존재하는 군과 존재하지 않는 군으로 나눠 총 6개의 군을 평가하였으며, 각 군당 6개의 모형을 측정하였다. 삼차원 광학 스캐너로 실험모형을 스캔한 후, 하나의 모형당 6개의 두 점 사이의 거리를 삼차원 디지털 계측 소프트웨어 상에서 측정하였다. 측정 거리의 변화 정도를 백분율로 계산하여 모형의 변형률을 구하였으며, 이것을 이원분산분석을 이용하여 유의수준 .05에서 분석하였다. 결과: 측정거리 6개 중 3개에서 인상재에 따라 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다. 반면, 치간 유두의 존재 여부에 따른 차이는 알지네이트 인상재에서 하나의 측정 거리에서만 유의한 차이를 보였을 뿐(P=.047), 다른 측정거리들과 인상재에서는 통계적으로 유의성 있는 차이를 나타내지 않았다. 결론: 치간 유두의 소실로 인한 언더컷의 존재가 부가중합형 실리콘 인상재와 알지네이트 인상재의 체적 정확도에 미치는 영향은 크지 않았다.

Keywords

References

  1. Finger WJ, Kurokawa R, Takahashi H, Komatsu M. Sulcus reproduction with elastomeric impression materials: a new in vitro testing method. Dent Mater 2008;24:1655-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.03.025
  2. Shah S, Sundaram G, Bartlett D, Sherriff M. The use of a 3D laser scanner using superimpositional software to assess the accuracy of impression techniques. J Dent 2004;32:653-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.07.005
  3. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Accuracy of alginate and elastomeric impression materials. Scand J Dent Res 1989;97:375-9.
  4. Lawson NC, Burgess JO, Litaker MS. Tensile elastic recovery of elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:29-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60131-6
  5. Rubel BS. Impression materials: a comparative review of impression materials most commonly used in restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2007;51:629-42, vi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2007.03.006
  6. Eriksson A, Ockert-Eriksson G, Lockowandt P. Accuracy of irreversible hydrocolloids (alginates) for fixed prosthodontics. A comparison between irreversible hydrocolloid, reversible hydrocolloid, and addition silicone for use in the syringe-tray technique. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:651-60. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836.1998.eos106207.x
  7. Kaiser DA, Nicholls JI. A study of distortion and surface hardness of improved artificial stone casts. J Prosthet Dent 1976;36:373-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(76)90157-8
  8. Nandini VV, Venkatesh KV, Nair KC. Alginate impressions: A practical perspective. J Conserv Dent 2008;11:37-41. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.43416
  9. Eames WB, Sieweke JC, Wallace SW, Rogers LB. Elastomeric impression materials: effect of bulk on accuracy. J Prosthet Dent 1979;41:304-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(79)90013-1
  10. Eames WB, Wallace SW, Suway NB, Rogers LB. Accuracy and dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:159-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(79)90166-5
  11. de Araujo PA, Jorgensen KD. Effect of material bulk and undercuts on the accuracy of impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 54:791-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90472-X
  12. Stober T, Johnson GH, Schmitter M. Accuracy of the newly formulated vinyl siloxanether elastomeric impression material. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:228-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60035-2
  13. Brosky ME, Pesun IJ, Lowder PD, Delong R, Hodges JS. Laser digitization of casts to determine the effect of tray selection and cast formation technique on accuracy. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:204-9. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.121240
  14. Goldfogel M, Harvey WL, Winter D. Dimensional change of acrylic resin tray materials. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:284-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90306-3
  15. Pagniano RP, Scheid RC, Clowson RL, Dagefoerde RO, Zardiackas LD. Linear dimensional change of acrylic resins used in the fabrication of custom trays. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:279-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90157-3
  16. Davis GB, Moser JB, Brinsden GI. The bonding properties of elastomer tray adhesives. J Prosthet Dent 1976;36:278-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(76)90183-9
  17. [No authors listed] Revised american dental association specification no. 19 for non-aqueous, elastomeric dental impression materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1977;94:733-41. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1977.0334
  18. Goldberg AJ. Viscoelastic properties of silicone, polysulfide, and polyether impression materials. J Dent Res 1974;53:1033-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345740530050301
  19. Inoue K, Wilson HJ. Viscoelastic properties of elastomeric im -pression materials. III. The elastic recovery after removal of strains applied at the setting time. J Oral Rehabil 1978;5:323-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1978.tb01250.x
  20. de Araujo PA, Jorgensen KD, Finger W. Viscoelastic properties of setting elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:633-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90237-9
  21. Donovan TE, Chee WW. A review of contemporary impression materials and techniques. Dent Clin North Am 2004;48:vi-vii, 445-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2003.12.014
  22. Klooster J, Logan GI, Tjan AH. Effects of strain rate on the behavior of elastomeric impression. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:292-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90252-R
  23. Chai J, Takahashi Y, Lautenschlager EP. Clinically relevant mechanical properties of elastomeric impression materials. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:219-23.
  24. Balkenhol M, Haunschild S, Erbe C, Wostmann B. Influence of prolonged setting time on permanent deformation of elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:288-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60060-1
  25. Burke FJ, Crisp RJ. A practice-based assessment of the handling of a fast-setting polyvinyl siloxane impression material used with the dual-arch tray technique. Quintessence Int 2001;32:805-10.
  26. Vinyl polysiloxane impression materials: a status report. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;120:595-6, 598, 600. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1990.0077
  27. Quick DC, Holtan JR, Ross GK. Use of a scanning laser threedimensional digitizer to evaluate dimensional accuracy of dental impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:229-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90319-6
  28. DeLong R, Pintado MR, Ko CC, Hodges JS, Douglas WH. Factors influencing optical 3D scanning of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. J Prosthodont 2001;10:78-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2001.00078.x
  29. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 3rd ed. St. Louis, USA, Elsevier, 2001. p. 354-79.