한국산림과학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science)

  • 제104권3호
  • /
  • Pages.443-453
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2586-6613(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2586-6621(eISSN)
한국산림과학회 (Korean Society of Forest Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

이용객 모니터링을 통한 홍릉숲 관리방안 연구

A Study on the Management Plan of Hongneung Forest Based on Visitor Monitoring

  • 최가영 (국립산림과학원 산림복지연구과) ;
  • 김통일 (국립산림과학원 산림복지연구과)
  • Choi, Ga Young (Division of Forest Welfare, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Tongil (Division of Forest Welfare, Korea Forest Research Institute)
  • 투고 : 2015.03.04
  • 심사 : 2015.07.20
  • 발행 : 2015.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

1922년 임업시험장으로 조성된 홍릉숲은 한국 임업연구의 요람이면서 도시민에게 휴식의 장소를 제공하는 도시숲으로서의 역할도 수행하고 있다. 본 연구는 홍릉숲을 대상으로 이용객 모니터링을 통해 효율적인 홍릉숲 관리방안을 도출하였으며, 이를 위해 주말 홍릉숲을 방문한 750명을 대상으로 설문조사를 수행하였다. 설문조사 결과 이용객 연령대는 고르게 분포하고 있었으며 홍릉숲 인근지역에 거주하는 비율이 높았다. 또한 휴양목적으로 방문하는 비중이 높았으며, 홍릉숲을 시험림보다는 쉼터로 인식하는 경향이 나타났다. 마지막으로 이용객들은 전반적으로 높은 만족도를 보였으며 향후 홍릉숲 보전을 위한 적극 홍보와 교육의 필요성을 제기하였다. 이와 같은 결과는 홍릉숲의 관리 향상을 위해 다음과 같은 시사점을 제공한다. 첫째, 홍릉숲이 시험림과 도시숲 기능을 동시에 수행하기 위해서는 숲 해설 프로그램의 확대와 홍보를 통해 홍릉숲의 가치와 중요성을 더욱 적극적으로 알려 이용객들의 인식을 제고하여야 한다. 둘째, 주말 이용객을 대상으로 모니터링 수행을 통해 수요를 추정하고, 이를 바탕으로 이용객 관리 프로그램을 적용해야 한다. 결론적으로 홍릉숲의 엄격한 자원보전과 만족스러운 휴양기회 제공이라는 사회적 수요를 조화롭게 달성할 수 있도록 이용객 관리시스템을 구축하고 이를 자원과 서비스 관리에 반영하는 것이 필요할 것이다.

In 1922, Hongneung forest was established to support the study of Korean forestry. Nowadays the forest also plays a role as urban forest which provides a green space for local people. This paper proposes the better management plan of Hongneung forest based on visitor monitoring. On-site surveys with a structured questionnaire were carried out from August to November in 2014 and total 750 data were analyzed. The survey results are as follows: 1) Visitors were inclusive of all age groups and most of them lived nearby Hongneung forest, 2) Visitors used the forest mainly for recreational purposes and recognized the forest as 'Green space' rather than 'experimental forest', 3) Visitors had great satisfaction from the forest visit and raised the necessity of more environment education and promotion of the program. Based on the results, the following solutions have been suggested: 1) Environment education will help visitors to raise awareness on the importance of Hongneung forest which plays a role as both experimental and urban forest, 2) Systematic visitor monitoring can contribute to efficient visitor management and administration of the areas. In conclusion, it is necessary to establish a visitor management system that enable to achieve a harmonization between nature conservation and recreational demands as well as to improve management of natural resource and service.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Atauri, Jose Antonio, Miguel Angel Bravo, and Asuncion Ruiz. 2000. Visitors' landscape preferences as a tool for management of recreational use in natural areas: A case study in Sierra de Guadarrama (Madrid, Spain). Landscape Research 25(1): 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/014263900113163
  2. Chhetri, Prem, Colin Arrowsmith, and Mervyn Jackson. 2004. Determining hiking experiences in nature-based tourist destinations. Tourism Management 25(1): 31-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(03)00057-8
  3. Glyptis, S. 1991. Countryside Recreation. Longman in association with the Institute of Leisure and Amenity Management, Harlow, Essex.
  4. Gomez-Limon, F. Javier and JoseV de Lucio. 1995. Recreational activities and loss of diversity in grasslands in Alta Manzanares Natural Park, Spain. Biological Conservation 74(2): 99-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(95)00018-Y
  5. Han, S.Y., Lee, S.H., and Kim, Y.P., 2010. A study on management activation of private recreational forest. The Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 14(2): 25-31.
  6. Hammitt, William E., David N. Cole, and Christopher A. Monz. 2015. Wildland recreation: ecology and management. John Wiley & Sons.
  7. Hammitt, William E., and Michael E. Patterson. 1993. Use Patterns and Solitude Preferences of Shelter Campers in Great Smoky Mountains National, USA. Journal of Environmental Management 38(1): 43-53. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1993.1028
  8. Hur, G.T. and Kim, D.H. 2004. A study on the visiting satisfaction and improvable measure of winter season's visitors in the recreation forest under the Northern National Forest Office. Korean Journal of Forest Economics 12(2): 48-57.
  9. Jeon, M. and Sim, K.W. 2010. The effects of recreation forest visitors' satisfaction on loyalty: A case of 33 national natural recreation forests. Journal of the Environmental Sciences 19(8): 961-969. https://doi.org/10.5322/JES.2010.19.8.961
  10. Jubenville, A. and Twight, B.W. 1993. Hazard management. Outdoor recreation management. State College. pp. 277-288.
  11. Kang, K.R. 2012. A study on efficient operation of recreation forests in Chungbuk basrd on level of user's satisfaction. The Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 16(1): 1-11.
  12. Kang, M.H. and Kim, S.I. 1997. Park managers' perceptions of national parks users' visit motivation and attitudes toward management policies. Journal of Korean Forest Society (0): 88-89.
  13. Kim, B.S. 2011. IPA analysis on the users' attitude of national recreation forest service program: Forest environmental education and culture program. Journal of Environmental Sciences 20(6): 721-728. https://doi.org/10.5322/JES.2011.20.6.721
  14. Kim, C.W., Yoon, H.J., and Lee, T.S. 2007. A study on the activation of national recreation forest: Using Importance-Performance Analysis. Korean Journal of Tourism Research 21(4): 101-119.
  15. Kim, I.J. 2008. A study on the selection attributes of natural recreation forest. Unpublished Master's thesis, Jeju National University, Korea.
  16. Kim, K.D., Han, S.Y., and Choi, K. 2004. The analysis of visitors' revisit factors in recreational forest. The Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 8(2): 47-53.
  17. KFRI (Korea Forest Research Institute). 2012. Carbon sink, Urban Forest. pp.220.
  18. KFRI (Korea Forest Research Institute). 2013. Valuation of non-market forest resources. pp.96.
  19. KFRI (Korea Forest Research Institute). 2014. Long-term plan for development of Hongneung forest. pp.91.
  20. KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2011. Plan for urban forest 2013-2017. pp.74.
  21. KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2013a. Plan for forest welfare. pp. 78.
  22. KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2013b. Plan for urban forest(modified). pp.74.
  23. KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2014. Statistical yearbook of forestry. pp.496.
  24. Lee, C.M. and Kwon, T.S. 2012. Characterization of the butterfly community of a fragmented urban forest, Hongneung Forest. Korean Journal of Applied Entomology 51(4): 317-323. https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2012.07.0.040
  25. Lee, Y.H. and Kim, K.W. 2011. Visitors' behavior and needs of national recreational forests in Korea. Journal of Korean society of People Plants Environment 14(4): 245-252.
  26. Marion, Jeffrey L. and Scott E. Reid. Minimising visitor impacts to protected areas: The efficacy of low impact education programmes. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 15(1): 5-27. https://doi.org/10.2167/jost593.0
  27. Noh, J.H. and Han, E.J. 2012. Market segmentation of recreation forest visitors by choice attributes. Journal of Tourism & Leisure 24(4): 421-440.
  28. Park, W.K., Byun, W.H., Kim, G.W., and Yoon, Y.C. 2008. A comparative study of representative interviews and on-site interviews for visiting patterns in urban forests. Korean Forest Society 2008(0): 23-25.
  29. Petrosillo, I., Zurlini G, Corliano M.E., Zaccarelli N., and Dadamo, M. 2007. Tourist perception of recreational environment and management in a marine protected area. Landscape and Urban Planning 79(1): 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.02.017
  30. Pierskalla, Chad, D., Dorothy H. Anderson, and David W. Lime. 2000. Examining leisure event opportunities of Isle Royale National Park: Bridging the gap between social process and spatial form. Wilderness science in a time of change conference. Vol. 5.
  31. Pouta, Eija, Tuija Sievanen, and Marjo Neuvonen. 2004. Profiling recreational users of national parks, national hiking areas and wilderness areas in Finland. Policies, methods and tools for visitor management. Proceedings of the second international conference on monitoring and management of visitor flows in recreational and protected areas.
  32. Rauhala, Jere, Joel Erkkonen, and Heikki Iisalo. 2002. Standardisation of visitor counting-Experiences from Finland. Monitoring and management of visitor flows in recreational and protected areas. Conference proceedings. Institute for Landscape Architecture and Landscape Management. Vienna.
  33. Schmitz, Maria F., Itziar De Aranzabal, and Francisco D. Pineda. 2007. Spatial analysis of visitor preferences in the outdoor recreational niche of Mediterranean cultural landscapes. Environmental Conservation 34(4): 300-312. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892907004249
  34. UNEP(United Nations Environment Programme). 1995. Environmental Codes of Conduct for Tourism. UNEP/IE, Technical Report No. 29.
  35. Virden, Randy J., and Richard Schreyer. 1988. Recreation specialization as an indicator of environmental preference. Environment and Behavior 20(6): 721-739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916588206004
  36. Yeon, P.S. and Shin, W.S. 2001. Measuring outdoor recreational motivations of national park and recreational forest users. Korean Journal for Forest Recreation 5(3): 59-66.
  37. Yoon, J.H. and Kim, S.J. 2003. Behavior of the forest recreation users. Journal of Tourism Sciences 27(3): 61-77.

피인용 문헌

  1. Developing User Persona Based on the Factors of Visitor Recreation Activities in Hongneung Experimental Forest vol.22, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe.2019.22.5.525
  2. The Characteristics of Urban Forests as Restorative Environments with the use of the Perceived Restorativeness Scale: focusing on the Hongneung Experimental Forest, Seoul, South Korea vol.8, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.8.1_107
  3. Landscaping Trees under the Impacts of Climate Changes: Construction Professionals’ Perceptions in the Field of Landscape Architecture in South Korea vol.8, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.8.1_94